always has been
2 Likes
Russian weapons have always been a dominant presence.
Just skill issues
The last time any Soviet thing was OP was Mig-23MLD and then the F-4J was added.
Not since Storm Warning, although they are still freaking strong
F-15s say hi.
EFT and Rafs are still better Alvis, you can’t deny it
In dogfights, not in general air battles with team mates.
You realize that top tier is not the game? USA still dominates air overall
Don’t like my posts Alvis
2 Likes
Pfft only top tier matters, what are you on about
P51H5NA, airspawn F-84s, F-100D, F-15A, F-16A, list any others.
You know how it goes. US dominates 90%+ of air but because they are not the best in 10% of the brs, it means gaijin never gives the US anything good :(
4 Likes
F8u and a10 my beloved
It’s pretty obvious that many users have some real life reasons to hate, so it’s really easy for them to latch onto the funniest reasons/things just to claim bias.
This thread is one of those, as it’s filled with misinformation and cherry picking just to “prove” bias is real.
2 Likes
Although i agree with the point of Nations having an imbalance in the amount of vehicles, all you’re advocatiing for here is inderectly or directly buffing NATO tanks for no good reason, M1 and 2A4 are fine at 10.7 and TURMS is fine at 10.0 (or 10.3 irrc).
Or it’s the noobs that are crying because you cannot do funny loop-dee-loops in P-51s like you can in Spitfires. I would know, I used to hate the American tech tree because I couldn’t turn fight.
And only 2 of them are half worth your time, but you could just play Germany for them and have a better time overall 😿
If only that was the case. Everyone likes to moan about the reverse speed and gun depression which are indeed cons but matter little when the majority of the maps you don’t need gun depression for and are designed so the Russians can essentially just hold W, point and click and win.
Setting aside the fact their armor layouts overperform and other things, the fact remains that often throughout the BR range, Russians have the most tanks to work with in layouts compared to just about everyone else, especially in BR ranges where it really counts. 9.7-10.3 and even the 9.3-10.3BR range being one of those zones.
But sure, the IvanBoos can keep pounding their head in the sand and act like it isn’t an issue. Completely unsurprising behavior from their lot.
I voted for APHE to be reworked to be more realistic, personally. It was crazy how so many have complained about APHE over the years being a nuke shell and then when we finally have a chance to change it they completely fumble the ball.
1 Like
Let’s see… Overperforming Kontact. Overperforming frontal slope armor values. Gen2 Gunner and Commander thermals. 10.3-10.7 performing APFSDS round. Cupola HMG capable of knocking out light vehicles and helicopters.
No, it’s 10.7 worthy just like the Leo 2 and Abrams. If you can’t handle the Turms being at 10.7 then folks just have skill issue and rely too much on the Bias code from Gaijin to do the work for them and those folks need to actually learn how to play.
To be fair, NATO tanks have several modeling issues that have been way overdue for correcting completely aside from any BR pains. it’s not a buff for them if Ivan vehicles that genuinely deserve it get their BR raised.
And no, the Turms should be at 10.7 along with the T-80UD.