the majority of Russian vehicles range from mid to terrible. (literally every T-series MBT is either mid or bad)
Only a handful are bullshit, some more than others. (the reasons for some being bs isn’t even unique to Russia)
Just like with every nation
You said Russian Bias ffs
How the hell can you not care about special treatment for Russia when you care about Russian Bias?
Yes but you conveniently forget to talk about the 2S6 and Pantsirs in that mater
They too have that kind of op autocannons, it’s not exclusive to NATO. It cannot be a bias, as every nations have those
Russia vehicles at top tier grb, on the other hand, are exclusive to Russia. They’re the only vehicles performing that much at those BRs.
“Stop twisting facts, concepts to your advantage” I should say
those autocannons do not shoot API-T
API-T is APHE
AP-T isn’t.
AP-T is nowhere near as good as API-T
Because I take what I can from dishonest people having allergic reactions as soon as we’re mentionning “russian bias”.
What I think deep inside me, and that large majority of players see everyday : there is a russian bias, it is blatant.
you’re calling us dishonest now?
This is a statement from you.
Who cares it’s same result, it’s the armor modeling which is broken
You can even shoot he all over the place, and still pen microscopic holes in the armor
Russia does not have any 8.X APIT autocannon spammers, and it is exclusive to NATO only. USA also has a very powerful 9.0 SPAA and I don’t see anyone bringing it up. They also have by far the best 6.7 lineup, and CAS below 9.3 at least, excluding the Yak-9K.
There is a whole lot of bias going on bro
British bias - no turret basket yet
Israel bias - no turret basket yet
USA bias - 5 Abrams at 12.0, each one of them are easily 12.3 material
USA bias 9.0 - M247 the giga chad SPAA while every other nations has dogwater SPAAs except China
Germany bias and Sweden bias - Leo 2A7 and 122A should be 13.0 but due to nation favoritsm they sit 12.7 to bully
it isn’t.
One acts solid shot, the other acts like APHE.
They are two very different shells
Shoot the cupola of M48 with API-T - he dies
Shoot the cupola of M48 with AP-T - only commander dies
You’re copying/pasting the same answer as before while I clearly stated it didn’t mater if you used IRST alongwith whatever kind of he T-90M has, because the result would be the same… all that because you lost your nerves in the previous argument, and want to win it… whatever man…
sadge
Thank you so goddamn much for your enlightenment /s
I cannot get it why you backstab everyone when others can be your allies if you talk softly.
Strange, what I see every day was American asks silly buff EXCLUSIVLY in the name of Russian Bias
“Gib AIM-120 to F/A-18C because Su-30MK” and such.
They’re fundamentally different.
It’s like saying AIM-9M and AAM-3 are the same thing (they’re not).
Funny thing, China has IRST with proxy shell but that doesn’t matter since it’s not Russia right?
Israel also has time fuze HE and IRST but whatever
No one cares, if you spam ap-t, you will kill everyone eventually
Or M61 APCBC-HE from Shermans and Shot M61 APCBC-solid from Crommy are the same thing
/j
Give every NATO nations more than they currently have, especially because of the russian bias
Balance things
The T-90M is definitely the best mbt in the universe. The biggest advantage the T-90M has is the reverse speed, they don’t have to calculate as much if they have to shoot on the move going backwards, this is another example of russian bias in action. It’s getting absurd at this point bro.
Your explanations don’t mater man
You’re copying/pasting the same answer again and again
I already explained both shells would have the exact same result against low flying cas and helicopters as soon as you use IRST with them, which the t-90m has
You’re acting like you’re not considering that argument, but people know. IRST lock a low flying cas or a heli, with both shells, the result will be the same : hit
You’re not gonna win that argument. You lost your temper the last day, you will do as well today, because you’re wrong
At this point, I am geniuely believes you are a Russian mole who sent for psyops. :/
You are not helpful for discussing balance or something but just crack out about russian bias.
If you keep acting like this, we will get nothing, thanks to you.
No, the only mobility bias in that mater is that they basically have +/- the same mobility than NATO MBTs going forward, if we only consider the first 30 seconds of acceleration (the acceleration you need midfight. Not talking about max speed there).
Which is indeed, a bias. Because russian MBTs shouldn’t be able to do that compared to NATO MBTs
