So it appears majority of russian vehicles are “bullshit” at top tier grb.
Special treatment or not I don’t care, all I care are the results. The results are : majority of their top tier vehicles are bullshit, which leads them to majority of wins
Call that whatever you want, it still serves my argument
Russia does not have any 8.X APIT autocannon spammers, and it is exclusive to NATO only. USA also has a very powerful 9.0 SPAA and I don’t see anyone bringing it up. They also have by far the best 6.7 lineup, and CAS below 9.3 at least, excluding the Yak-9K.
British bias - no turret basket yet
Israel bias - no turret basket yet
USA bias - 5 Abrams at 12.0, each one of them are easily 12.3 material
USA bias 9.0 - M247 the giga chad SPAA while every other nations has dogwater SPAAs except China
Germany bias and Sweden bias - Leo 2A7 and 122A should be 13.0 but due to nation favoritsm they sit 12.7 to bully
You’re copying/pasting the same answer as before while I clearly stated it didn’t mater if you used IRST alongwith whatever kind of he T-90M has, because the result would be the same… all that because you lost your nerves in the previous argument, and want to win it… whatever man…
The T-90M is definitely the best mbt in the universe. The biggest advantage the T-90M has is the reverse speed, they don’t have to calculate as much if they have to shoot on the move going backwards, this is another example of russian bias in action. It’s getting absurd at this point bro.
You’re copying/pasting the same answer again and again
I already explained both shells would have the exact same result against low flying cas and helicopters as soon as you use IRST with them, which the t-90m has
You’re acting like you’re not considering that argument, but people know. IRST lock a low flying cas or a heli, with both shells, the result will be the same : hit
You’re not gonna win that argument. You lost your temper the last day, you will do as well today, because you’re wrong