Ok so what does “top tier grb Russia is bullshit. They have the best SPAAs best CAS best tanks” mean to you ?
Enlight us
Ok so what does “top tier grb Russia is bullshit. They have the best SPAAs best CAS best tanks” mean to you ?
Enlight us
simply that there are bullshit aspects, not that there’s bias.
Here’s the quote:
https://www.youtube.com/live/l2SKdxiUdic?si=c0ycm-VFVwdK7YAF&t=12719
He’s saying he stopped playing top tier grb because Russia is bullshit because they have the best spaas best cas bmpt, then repeated top tier Russia is so bullshit
What does that imply
Problem is
You want to manipulate his speech for your use.
By putting words into people’s mouths or changing the meaning of things to suit your argument.
You are turning others who can be your allies into your enemies. By those movements.
You don’t have to be a native to understand this.
literally just that he doesn’t enjoy fighting it.
Is that really hard to understand?
Stop twisting his words
What does the sentence explaining top tier grb Russia is bullshit mean
Explain it
Literally exactly what he said, “it’s bullshit”
He never mentioned bias, never. You are still trying to twist his words
No it doesn’t mean that
I don’t enjoy fighting fast targets like french 7.0 tanks, doesn’t mean I call them bullshit
It literally does.
Stop twisting information, statements and data to match your stupid argument.
You’re trying to gaslight people, just stop it


He either thinks top tier grb russian vehicles are “stupid”, “untrue”, represent a “nonsense” or expresses a strong “disagreement” towards them
Each one of them meaning top tier grb russian vehicles are stupidly modeled which advantages them, have a false modeling advantaging them, are modeled in a nonsense way which advantages them, or that Jon expresse a strong disagreement towards the modeling of russian vehicles at top tier
It doesn’t require a Masters degree to understand what it means
For example
I don’t enjoy fighting against Zeros while I play my Spitty
The fight against them feels bullshit
But it doesn’t mean that Gaijin is biasing Japan
Because why I felt bullshit about that was, American players who dig ground or turnfight against Zero, not Zero itself
Yes. Currently, Russians are having some kinda of biased vehicles
But it doesn’t mean Russians are getting special treatment.
With your way of twisting facts
I can counterargue that Gaijin is heavily biasing US because
F-5C got ahistorical countermeasures, and those props such as F8F are generally undertiered, F-14A was first 4th gen when no other nations had any 4th gen, and Abrams have better ready rack than Chally do.
If you construct a better-built claim
I guess more guys would agree with you.
Just… you can use better things to prove russian bias instead of gaslighting someone.
Yes. Currently, Russians are having some kinda of biased vehicles
But it doesn’t mean Russians are getting special treatment.
I don’t care saying Gaijin is privileging Russia on purpose, for some reason. All I care is : are there russian vehicles out there which are biased. Whatever the reasons are behind that, I just care about the results
It appears you too think top tier grb russian vehicles are “kinda of biased vehicles”. That’s all I care about, that’s all that maters
NATO has 35mm spaa with API-T that can kill vehicles by shooting the floor
that’s bullshit
PUMA was 8.3 on release, that was bullshit.
P-51H is undertiered, that’s bullshit.
MiG-29 doesn’t get the weapons it’s supposed to have, that’s bullshit.
Rafale for an entire year…
abrams at 12.0 are better than many 12.3 and 12.7 tanks
A-6E TRAM with approx. 12km range rocket propelled bombs at 10.7…
F-15A/F-15J at 12.7
Every nation has bullshit. USA, Germany, Russia, Japan, Britain, France, Italy, even Israel.
Russia isn’t an exception to this, no nation gets more special treatment compared to other nations.
Gaijin just sucks at balancing and wt players suck
Then you should’ve put your damn word wisely.
Instead of manifulating words
So it appears majority of russian vehicles are “bullshit” at top tier grb.
Special treatment or not I don’t care, all I care are the results. The results are : majority of their top tier vehicles are bullshit, which leads them to majority of wins
Call that whatever you want, it still serves my argument
the majority of Russian vehicles range from mid to terrible. (literally every T-series MBT is either mid or bad)
Only a handful are bullshit, some more than others. (the reasons for some being bs isn’t even unique to Russia)
Just like with every nation
You said Russian Bias ffs
How the hell can you not care about special treatment for Russia when you care about Russian Bias?
Yes but you conveniently forget to talk about the 2S6 and Pantsirs in that mater
They too have that kind of op autocannons, it’s not exclusive to NATO. It cannot be a bias, as every nations have those
Russia vehicles at top tier grb, on the other hand, are exclusive to Russia. They’re the only vehicles performing that much at those BRs.
“Stop twisting facts, concepts to your advantage” I should say
those autocannons do not shoot API-T

API-T is APHE
AP-T isn’t.
AP-T is nowhere near as good as API-T