No, the only mobility bias in that mater is that they basically have +/- the same mobility than NATO MBTs going forward, if we only consider the first 30 seconds of acceleration (the acceleration you need midfight. Not talking about max speed there).
Which is indeed, a bias. Because russian MBTs shouldn’t be able to do that compared to NATO MBTs
If you keep acting like this, we will get nothing, thanks to you.
Plot twist : we will get nothing with or without me. It’s the whole point of a bias.
Just complain to devs about all the green winrate colors in the russian top tier grb brackets instead of attacking me lol. I’m not the one who conveniently put all these things together to give Russia the absolute dominance at top tier
Russia got their BMPT, where is the lav-25 ? And I mean a GOOD lav-25, with a GOOD autocannon, not a poop bushmaster, as NATO always get
EDIT : where are the spike/mmp missiles doing correct damages, as they’re supposed to ?
EDIT 2 : Abrams front glacis not shattering apfsds-t and turret ring inaccuracies - #59 by office_chair
Even this office chair finds interesting the fact Abrams remain with their poop armor for years
Interesting…
This guy also thinks NATO bushmasters are overtiered af, and thus are poop
Only NATO gets poop
Uhm ackshually, t72b3a is top 1 yes
Wdym, if YOU get LAV-25 in US
YOU will get bushmaster M242 because that is what LAV-25 using.
If we consider we get Good LAV-25 with Good autocannon, which can be tie with BMPT just for arguings sake
What does that helpful for BALANCING NATO
when you americans will get that LAV-25 exculsively?
Tell us the truth. You want to replace russia with america and want to see America bias instead of Russian one
And you don’t give a damn about NATO.
You nationalist americans always bring NATO when asking for YOUR buff and don’t care when others such as brits or Italians get awful vehicles.
Wdym, if YOU get LAV-25 in US
- YOU will get bushmaster M242 because that is what LAV-25 using.
So we already know lav-25 will be poop. What a surprise, I’m shocked
What does that helpful for BALANCING NATO
It would atleast balance NATO at the lav-25’s br, because it would bring nato a better ifv
when you americans will get that LAV-25 exculsively?
I hope not. But it wouldn’t be a problem, if other NATO IFVs got non-poop IFVs as well (all the spike/mmps which don’t work, all the poopmasters autocannons, …)
Tell us the truth. You want to replace russia with america and want to see America bias instead of Russian one
And you don’t give a damn about NATO.
Man I’m french (and a France main). Why on earth would I want to see America dominate more than France ? lmao
Plus, America is often teamed up with Russia at top tier grb, so it’d mean France would fight x2 bias at the same time. It would be hell
I really want to see all NATO vehicles being buffed lol (because they’re often teamed up all together at top tier grb). Preferably France first, but that ship has sailed
Im wondering if something is going to be done about ghibli which somehow sits at higher br than tram in grb. Devs returned both at same time but ghibli feels like obvious scam.
Do you have proof for this statement?
There are no sources for his statements.
Various examples of non-poop NATO things.
There’s more but I’m sure you don’t believe me
How in the world giving LAV-25 to US giving balance on NATO-wise?
Especially when I probably going to have chance to fight against Bradley or LAV-25 while playing Warrior?
Same goddamn logics
when F-14A stormed
“MiG-23M also meta so we need to keep F-14A meta too”
when both F-15A and Su-27 storms 3rd gen
“R-27ER is worse than AIM-7M so shut up”
You are backstabbing nato
Do you have proof for this statement?
It’s a balance problem
Russian vehicles should be fat and well armored, NATO vehicles should be light and less armored.
But it’s not even the case with the t-90m and bvm anymore. They’re both fast
There are no sources for his statements.
And what is that man ? Those are literally the 2 top posts of the thread lol
If you want to blindly defend Russia, at least make the efforts man
True as well, bro complains about Russian bias but can only talk about america besides Russia.
typical american
try holding S
Other NATO nations are sometimes (often) teamed up with the US lol
But I’m not saying other NATO nations shouldn’t be buffed as well. Of course they should
1 - I’m a France main, I’m not american
2 - When did I only defend the US ? I defend all NATO nations
3 - I might defend the US more than any other NATO nations, only because :
This really sounds like Pax Americana or American bias ngl.
If you are really French, you sound more American than my American friend.
I’m really french though
I cannot lie about the plain truth. Money is power. They have the biggest military in the world, what can I say. Let’s be honest, the only military which can eventually dominate the world someday would be the US, Russia or China. Forget about europe or other nations lol
You can’t compare their army to the italian army for example. And I’m saying that while also having italian origins
from last month or so
It changes depending the BRs
France fights Russia more, more often at top tier grb than at 9.7 for example
Your numbers might be a gross average throughout the BRs
EDIT : for example : USA with USSR… 25% only at top tier grb… is not true
first post has no sources cited, Lolman’s reports include one bug report which was fixed and one who’s sources are just images from news sites. I don’t have the mathematical knowhow to confirm the accuracy of the bug reporter’s statement (the bug reporter stated themselves that they don’t either)
The bug report may also be outdated thanks to the new internal modules.
The other two are stuck in “accepted” limbo just like so many other bug reports. Nothing special unfortunately. So many bug reports just end up like that regardless of which vehicle they’re for (besides rafale)
This is for top tier, I’ll post the source in a sec