Russian Bias in 2026?

For example
I don’t enjoy fighting against Zeros while I play my Spitty
The fight against them feels bullshit

But it doesn’t mean that Gaijin is biasing Japan
Because why I felt bullshit about that was, American players who dig ground or turnfight against Zero, not Zero itself

Yes. Currently, Russians are having some kinda of biased vehicles
But it doesn’t mean Russians are getting special treatment.

With your way of twisting facts
I can counterargue that Gaijin is heavily biasing US because
F-5C got ahistorical countermeasures, and those props such as F8F are generally undertiered, F-14A was first 4th gen when no other nations had any 4th gen, and Abrams have better ready rack than Chally do.

If you construct a better-built claim
I guess more guys would agree with you.

Just… you can use better things to prove russian bias instead of gaslighting someone.

2 Likes

Yes. Currently, Russians are having some kinda of biased vehicles
But it doesn’t mean Russians are getting special treatment.

I don’t care saying Gaijin is privileging Russia on purpose, for some reason. All I care is : are there russian vehicles out there which are biased. Whatever the reasons are behind that, I just care about the results

It appears you too think top tier grb russian vehicles are “kinda of biased vehicles”. That’s all I care about, that’s all that maters

NATO has 35mm spaa with API-T that can kill vehicles by shooting the floor
that’s bullshit
PUMA was 8.3 on release, that was bullshit.

P-51H is undertiered, that’s bullshit.
MiG-29 doesn’t get the weapons it’s supposed to have, that’s bullshit.
Rafale for an entire year…
abrams at 12.0 are better than many 12.3 and 12.7 tanks
A-6E TRAM with approx. 12km range rocket propelled bombs at 10.7…
F-15A/F-15J at 12.7

Every nation has bullshit. USA, Germany, Russia, Japan, Britain, France, Italy, even Israel.

Russia isn’t an exception to this, no nation gets more special treatment compared to other nations.

Gaijin just sucks at balancing and wt players suck

4 Likes

Then you should’ve put your damn word wisely.

Instead of manifulating words

So it appears majority of russian vehicles are “bullshit” at top tier grb.

Special treatment or not I don’t care, all I care are the results. The results are : majority of their top tier vehicles are bullshit, which leads them to majority of wins

Call that whatever you want, it still serves my argument

the majority of Russian vehicles range from mid to terrible. (literally every T-series MBT is either mid or bad)

Only a handful are bullshit, some more than others. (the reasons for some being bs isn’t even unique to Russia)

Just like with every nation

1 Like

You said Russian Bias ffs
How the hell can you not care about special treatment for Russia when you care about Russian Bias?

1 Like

Yes but you conveniently forget to talk about the 2S6 and Pantsirs in that mater

They too have that kind of op autocannons, it’s not exclusive to NATO. It cannot be a bias, as every nations have those

Russia vehicles at top tier grb, on the other hand, are exclusive to Russia. They’re the only vehicles performing that much at those BRs.

“Stop twisting facts, concepts to your advantage” I should say

those autocannons do not shoot API-T
image
API-T is APHE
AP-T isn’t.

AP-T is nowhere near as good as API-T

3 Likes

Because I take what I can from dishonest people having allergic reactions as soon as we’re mentionning “russian bias”.

What I think deep inside me, and that large majority of players see everyday : there is a russian bias, it is blatant.

you’re calling us dishonest now?
image
This is a statement from you.

3 Likes

Who cares it’s same result, it’s the armor modeling which is broken

You can even shoot he all over the place, and still pen microscopic holes in the armor

Russia does not have any 8.X APIT autocannon spammers, and it is exclusive to NATO only. USA also has a very powerful 9.0 SPAA and I don’t see anyone bringing it up. They also have by far the best 6.7 lineup, and CAS below 9.3 at least, excluding the Yak-9K.

2 Likes

There is a whole lot of bias going on bro

British bias - no turret basket yet
Israel bias - no turret basket yet
USA bias - 5 Abrams at 12.0, each one of them are easily 12.3 material
USA bias 9.0 - M247 the giga chad SPAA while every other nations has dogwater SPAAs except China
Germany bias and Sweden bias - Leo 2A7 and 122A should be 13.0 but due to nation favoritsm they sit 12.7 to bully

it isn’t.
One acts solid shot, the other acts like APHE.

They are two very different shells

Shoot the cupola of M48 with API-T - he dies
Shoot the cupola of M48 with AP-T - only commander dies

3 Likes

You’re copying/pasting the same answer as before while I clearly stated it didn’t mater if you used IRST alongwith whatever kind of he T-90M has, because the result would be the same… all that because you lost your nerves in the previous argument, and want to win it… whatever man…

sadge

Thank you so goddamn much for your enlightenment /s
I cannot get it why you backstab everyone when others can be your allies if you talk softly.

Strange, what I see every day was American asks silly buff EXCLUSIVLY in the name of Russian Bias
“Gib AIM-120 to F/A-18C because Su-30MK” and such.

1 Like

They’re fundamentally different.
It’s like saying AIM-9M and AAM-3 are the same thing (they’re not).

Funny thing, China has IRST with proxy shell but that doesn’t matter since it’s not Russia right?
Israel also has time fuze HE and IRST but whatever



No one cares, if you spam ap-t, you will kill everyone eventually