Can you timestamp it
The live also did not begin at 3h30
I can’t, he’s live rn. The video redirects to a live
I didn’t say it began at 3h30, I said I posted the question 3h30 after the live started
If you listen closely, he didn’t say “tanks”, he meant BMPT.
He also never said there’s bias, he just said it’s bullshit.
While yes, it’s bullshit, it’s not bias.
Every nation has bullshit going for them
3 Likes
You don’t need ownership experience to have an opinion on a vehicle.
Otherwise all Russian bias claims could be defeated on that argument alone, since nearly all that make such claims have no experience in Soviet vehicles in-game.
I was telling people F-18A was OP weeks before I owned it, and when I got it I matched my Gripen KDR when the Gripen was OP.
Yes. But if you have vehicle, your statements get more reliability.
About this part, it sounds true but you should’ve warned yourself about generalisation.
I don’t think you need to tell this unless you want to say “I am skilled well, and I am so proud of myself” just like Michael in early seasons does.
Lastly, it is quite frustrating that you ignored ‘that’ comment.
Now seems you act more like Col Nathan Jessup instead of Toby.
“I want the truth” /s
If people with x vehicle (that are good players) agree with my statements even if I don’t I have x vehicle (but similar aircraft) I’d say my statements should be valid
1 Like
I didn’t mean to stab ya.
Your opinion is also valid if the owners of vehicles approve.
But people usually believe your opinion more if you have that vehicle directly.
I mean, I can make a take about Tornado IDS(1995) without owning it and relying more on GR.1 experience, but if I own IDS(1995), probably lads will be convinced a little bit more.
1 Like
KDR in a vacuum doesn’t matter, nor does skill outside consistency.
It’s why I didn’t mention the KDR itself, but instead mentioned another vehicle’s history it matched to.
It does not matter what KDR a player has in any vehicle; if they are consistent, then an OP vehicle will go above and beyond any margin of error that could exist [I like to say 0.5 KDR usually is a solid margin of error].
Not as good as a cross analysis, but a cross analysis gives a good proof for OP vehicles, and that proof can be used to learn how to do well in said OP vehicles where their record is well above one’s average.
Dubious. Pl8b and pl12(was) better than the r-77 and r73.
And whilst yeah hmd was and still is king at 13.7 the j11 has a better radar. Not sure about rwr coverage and i dont remember if it gets maws
So, you evaded that selective realism comment. And want to stay with KDA.
Selective debate after selective realism, very clever.
I don’t think pushing your standard to everyone is a good idea.
Anyway.
Colonel Alvis R. Wisla, why are you evading the debate that Gaijin have a rubberband-ish standard about applying realism to their loadouts?
We need to know.
Why?
Because “You cannot handle the truth.”?
My top ten best tanks in the game
- T-90M
- T-90M
- BMPT
- T-80BVM
- BMPT-72
- Challenger 2E
- VT4A1
- Ariete
- Lecler
- TKX
The rest that not listed here are dogcraps that should be drop to 11.0
1 Like
PL-12 (old) was about equal with R-77 for quality.
I am not an expert on IR missile perf so I can’t say much there.
Your main weapon is radar missiles either way so I don’t think the IR missiles are too important.
The Su-27SM also has the option of carrying R-27Es and can carry more missiles.
Thanks to missile count + the options for what it carries the Su-27SM has the best missile kit at 13.7.
flight performance is close enough to be negligible.
Su-27SM does have worse awareness (no MAW, worse RWR coverage, worse radar) it’s still good enough for a solid player to make use of (especially now with NCTR).
The J-11B has the lower skill floor due to better awareness, but the Su-27SM just has the superior kit which makes it better.
“Selective loadouts” doesn’t matter because all ten tech trees have planes without weapons, which makes the claim disproved on that fact alone.
It’s a boring claim cause it’s easy to refute.
*“Selective Realism”
Lame statement, Colonel.
That claim cannot be disproved on fact alone, because, “Gaijin’s Standard is acting like a rubber band” cannot be disproved on fact.
Gaijin use fictional-ish standards when they want to bias something. Such as
-Ahistorical CM pods on F-5A/C(USAF) thanks to exported F-5A variant
-Weaponry which never integrated on Yak-141
-SRAAM on Harrier GR.1 when it was test-fired on Harrier T.2 instead of GR.1.
Or use technical compatibility when they want to make things ideal.
-Skyflash SuperTEMP on Italian Tornado ADV when our MoD didn’t let Italians have SuperTEMP
-Eastern Germany’s MiG-29 never had a stockpile of R-27ER but Gaijin gave them anyway because they were frightened about adding R-73 atm.
And when they want to nerf something they use strictly accurate historical options.
-F-4J(UK) cannot use American weaponry even though those are EX-USN F-4J.
-Taiwanese F-104G cannot get CM because some of those were EX-JASDF F-104J, when German F-104G were capable of installing CM.
Their standard are iffy and their definition of realism acts like a rubber band.
Gaijin has bias. That is the truth. It is quite debatable to call it russian bias because they do things like this around the globe, but they have bias. Maybe not for nations but more on vehicles.
Colonel.
I reckon you took this much time because this was interesting claim, and it was hard to refute for you. /j
2 Likes
Yeah, this is pretty much accurate. Gaijin is not consistent at all with anything (other than being inconsistent and having terrible game design). They’re also incredibly inconsistent with what rules they apply to every vehicle and how “realistic” they want to be as well as their balancing
2 Likes
He also never said there’s bias, he just said it’s bullshit.
Tomato tomato
He said bullshit, he ofc meant bias by that. It has no other meaning, except “a list of chaotic events led top tier Russia to become bullshit”, which at the end of the day, still means there is a (wanted or unwanted) bias
Anyway, Russia is largely privileged at top tier grb, let’ say it like that. More than any other nation
Did he say there was bias? no, just that it was bullshit.
Stop putting words into his mouth
1 Like
Top tier Russia being bullshit = there is a russian bias
You don’t have to be a native to understand that
No it does not.
He answered your question and never said there was bias.
Stop putting words into people’s mouths or changing the meaning of things to suit your argument.
1 Like