So true!
Arena completely OP! No justification for that!
12.7 french Leclerc doesn’t even have IR vision in commander sight, please balance!
So true!
Arena completely OP! No justification for that!
12.7 french Leclerc doesn’t even have IR vision in commander sight, please balance!
Play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia and show me the wins VS looses, no need for further argument.
Thank you.
There’s nothing out of the OP about it. The T-90A or T-90S are no worse, but they’re only average in terms of effectiveness.
No other Soviet/Russian tank, except the T-90M, has this feature, so what? It’s hardly a particularly necessary feature.
Russia has the bias at 13.0 AND 10.7 (possibly every BRs between those 2 as well).
My performance = 1/16th of the overhaul NATO team performance, I could literraly leave without spawning and waiting for the result, it wouldn’t change anything.
Play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show me the wins VS looses. No more talking.
Okay. This are my 100 games against russia with M1:

it shows 65% winrate, that differs at least for 30% against your USSR OP winrate
On the contrary, there is my 10.3 USSR winrate, and to make it more fair i`ll use the tech tree winrates as i got them much later than premiums

which shows basically twice worse stars than you provide
On the contrary, some of the “nato-side” winrates:




p.s. premiums tend to have more winrate, so P2W bias
It’s not useless, Russia will now have 4 pantsir respawns per player = 64 Pantsirs overhaul, literally unplayable
You just don’t want to show me the results, because you know I’m right. I challenge anyone to show me 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia with an overhaul winrate > 40%.
You can give a player a trash tank, but they can outplay bad players in good tanks.
So you want him to tell us how skilled the teams are… Okay.
I have a sub-40% win rate on balanced vehicles and OP vehicles.
I have a post-60% win rate on balanced vehicles and over-BR’d vehicles.
Win rate says nothing about how powerful a vehicle is.
Win rate is 32 players in an unknown amount of variety going at it.
That is hundreds of variables.
No commander IR vision at 12.7 for a MBT = poo. T-90M is 12.7. Leclerc is 12.7. Leclerc unbalanced.
winrate basically shows how lucky you are, thats straight fact
If you cry and leave after 1 death your 100 games are just as a joke.
And USA 10.7 is something what I like to play, they got nice lineup in there.
Biggest issue is people like you who call it a russian bias , and leaves just after they get 1 hitted , or they just got 1 tank on lineup and begone.
And your “russian” bias in 13.0 is only cas, but let us pretend rafale, and ef doesnt exists, and having Germany on top tier means having best AA on team from top tier.
And yes that same LDIRCM helo cancer is on every nation nowdays, not just mi28.
I want to see how many pantsirs I will face in 10.7 lineup.
Plot twist = None.
And before that pantsir is on game or even devs , i wouldnt start calling it out just yet, and lets see will they raise basic pantsirs br also, so it wouldnt be free aa anymore
I don’t want to see your vehicle winrates which can be played along with Russia, I want to see 100 games in a row against Russia.
And the wins VS looses. No more coping.
You won’t make anyone believe Russia has 40% winrate at 10.7. Stop spreading misinfirmation
Thats why winratesof a couple dozen games like Sadriper brings up doesnt say anything but millions of games averaged out over a month absolutely say something about the strenght of vehicles or lineups to be more precise
T-80BVM doesnt have commander IR. Who cares?
yes, as it has 35 xD
Me! I want proper top tier MBTs for USSR, im sick of playing garbage taks

?
Nope, it says nothing irrelevant of amount.
Not even KDR says anything notable, and that’s better than win rate.
Especially in realistic and simulator battles.
Yes, I want to see how often NATO forces win VS loose against 10.7 GRB Russia. Simple as that.
Your team looses => allies get demoralized and leave after 1 death / play in a bad way => Russia wins and have better performance than NATO. If your team winrate is bad every time => performances get bad.
You want to increase a nation’s perf, you increase its winrate. Hence, you balance Russia.
Yes it does. Claiming that stats from millions of games dont tell anything relevant is insane
You missed the context again. It was practical joke about counting the winrate over onself`s stats