Winrate of 1 particular individual is bad so i should play 100 games and show you my personal winrate of 1 particular individual?
1 Like
Hey, any of you devil advocates wanna drop a couple of words about a fresh new pantsir, huh?
1 Like
The more dogwater you are the more likely your team lost, I’ve met players with 0.3 KD and guess what, their vehicles winning rate are average lower than depth of hell, like hundred of match with 20-30% winning because they are mostly dead weight for the team, their influence only draining their own tickets more than the enemies, so everyone is different, there are also players here with 70% - 80% on their NATO’s vehicles which is also inline with their ru stats so what are you going to do with those numbers? Lol
Man, just stop coping and show me 100 games as NATO force against 10.7 Russia. You’ll get 0-30% winrate.
And if 100 games is not enough, show me 300, 500, 1000 more. The trend will stay the same.
I don’t trust those make up numbers, I can see the trend with my own eyes through the games.
Weight of 1 player performance = 1/16 of the overhaul team performance. The perf of 1 single player within the team is residual
“It just makes the grind longer man…”
Reality => they’ll now get 4 pantsir respawns, for x2 more missiles launched with multitarget system, and no more NATO CAS in the air.
T-72B (1989) - fixed, monstrously awkward 8x sight
T-72B3 Arena - convenient 4-12 sight
T-72B (1989) - no duplication of control for the commander (10.3 lol)
T-72B3 Arena - the commander has a duplication of control
T-72B (1989) - no thermal imager
T-72B3 Arena - 2nd generation thermal imager
T-72B (1989) - 24/3.5 aiming drives
T-72B3 Arena - 40/40 aiming drives
Try comparing the vehicles carefully.
2 Likes
Are you slow or something bro? Every players has different skill level, their numbers are not going to be the same as yours.
Player A, 1000 matches on Leopard 2, 70% winning rate, thinks that bussian rias is a joke
Player B (you), 1000 matches on Leopard 2, 33% winning rate, thinks that bussian rias exist
Do you still not see why he is 70% and you are 33% with similar match counts? Sure it got nothing to do with your play style lol
The thing is, you showed battles and timestamps of those battles screamed most of games, you just left soon as you hit 1 death.
Now, you talk a lot of ussr bias especially in 12.7/13.0 , and yet you cry 10.7 games.
And if you want to talk about 10.7 USSR has worst cas on that BR.
Oh well…
1 Like
I must acknowledge, you have a very fair point. I wouldnt say that sights matter, but the rest is quite fair. Thy the reason its not 10.3, but 11.0
If it won’t get a new missile, then mostly useless and it’s fine. If it will get a new missile, then better to test it on dev first, but in general they don’t need it now. The main victims will be helis, especially without FnF. Probably nothing will change for planes.
I don’t want to play on 10.7. I play only 13.0 when i solo. And I can’t understand why you can’t bring some statshark stat when it should be super easy if your statment is true. It is reliable source and easy to check. Or why I can’t use 100+ games of some random USSR player which should show the same thing as my 100+ games.
1 Like
So true!
Arena completely OP! No justification for that!
12.7 french Leclerc doesn’t even have IR vision in commander sight, please balance!
Play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia and show me the wins VS looses, no need for further argument.
Thank you.
There’s nothing out of the OP about it. The T-90A or T-90S are no worse, but they’re only average in terms of effectiveness.
No other Soviet/Russian tank, except the T-90M, has this feature, so what? It’s hardly a particularly necessary feature.
Russia has the bias at 13.0 AND 10.7 (possibly every BRs between those 2 as well).
My performance = 1/16th of the overhaul NATO team performance, I could literraly leave without spawning and waiting for the result, it wouldn’t change anything.
Play 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia, and show me the wins VS looses. No more talking.
Okay. This are my 100 games against russia with M1:
it shows 65% winrate, that differs at least for 30% against your USSR OP winrate
On the contrary, there is my 10.3 USSR winrate, and to make it more fair i`ll use the tech tree winrates as i got them much later than premiums
which shows basically twice worse stars than you provide
On the contrary, some of the “nato-side” winrates:
p.s. premiums tend to have more winrate, so P2W bias
3 Likes
It’s not useless, Russia will now have 4 pantsir respawns per player = 64 Pantsirs overhaul, literally unplayable
You just don’t want to show me the results, because you know I’m right. I challenge anyone to show me 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia with an overhaul winrate > 40%.
You can give a player a trash tank, but they can outplay bad players in good tanks.
So you want him to tell us how skilled the teams are… Okay.
I have a sub-40% win rate on balanced vehicles and OP vehicles.
I have a post-60% win rate on balanced vehicles and over-BR’d vehicles.
Win rate says nothing about how powerful a vehicle is.
Win rate is 32 players in an unknown amount of variety going at it.
That is hundreds of variables.
No commander IR vision at 12.7 for a MBT = poo. T-90M is 12.7. Leclerc is 12.7. Leclerc unbalanced.
winrate basically shows how lucky you are, thats straight fact