Thats why winratesof a couple dozen games like Sadriper brings up doesnt say anything but millions of games averaged out over a month absolutely say something about the strenght of vehicles or lineups to be more precise
T-80BVM doesnt have commander IR. Who cares?
yes, as it has 35 xD
Me! I want proper top tier MBTs for USSR, im sick of playing garbage taks
?
Nope, it says nothing irrelevant of amount.
Not even KDR says anything notable, and that’s better than win rate.
Especially in realistic and simulator battles.
Yes, I want to see how often NATO forces win VS loose against 10.7 GRB Russia. Simple as that.
Your team looses => allies get demoralized and leave after 1 death / play in a bad way => Russia wins and have better performance than NATO. If your team winrate is bad every time => performances get bad.
You want to increase a nation’s perf, you increase its winrate. Hence, you balance Russia.
Yes it does. Claiming that stats from millions of games dont tell anything relevant is insane
You missed the context again. It was practical joke about counting the winrate over onself`s stats
I don’t want because some random man from internet ask me so spend 6+ hours on br that i consider super boring to play while i suggest 5 min solution that will bring absolutely the same result.
Well, I guess Statshark, college, and the science of statistics is insane to you then.
Statshark and Thunderskill both warn you not to use their data to argue about vehicles.
I literally have 10 13.0 french vehicles in the line up. Russia has 70-100% winrate at 13.0. I leave after all the vehicles have been used, what are you talking about.
Stop the cope, show the 100 10.7 GRB games against Russia and the wins/looses.
Players playing with that MBT should. Because it’s a precious asset.
But they just hold W and steamroll everyone because of the bias, so yes you’re right they don’t care.
As a matter of fact I don’t want them to get the IR vision on commander sight, because it will be a good excuse to move it down at 9.3.
So, BVM at 9.3 when?
Sure 35%, Russia is a very bad nation, I would even say 10% ngl.
The amount of coping in this post omg
No they are not, because they support what i say. Claiming that millions of games points offer no relevant data is complete insanity. That is literally how statistics works.
Citation needed. Also it doesnt matter what they say, if their data is sound then it can and should be used to compare vehicles.
well at least at 10.3-10.7 it is, having garbage tanks & basically single attacker
Look at NATO winrates, it’s all red it’s pathetic.
Britain seems fine. And it has not better tanks than germany and US xD
Your numbers are made up and fake, I don’t trust these 1 bit.
35% winrate for Russia at 10.7 GRB, nobody believes that.