I’m not gonna spend many hours on boring and tiresome br (for me) for some random person on the internet when he’ll probably find 1,000 reasons why my results are fake/irrelevant/lucky if they seem “wrong” to him (I’ve had this happen more than once). Especially when I can take any random player’s stats for the last 2 weeks from statshark and they will be worth the same as my games.
1 Like
That’s why i said „more precise, lineups“
Also yeah ofc cherry picked stats in a vacuum don’t give proper information without proper interpretation. That’s nothing new and exactly what statistics is about
You ask what I am talking about of you 1 death leaving, just looking these timestamps of your fights , just screams how you leave after getting killed, nothing more.
But keep yapping about this “bias”
Its literally the K/D ratio for one tank per match to tell whether it’s OP or not
2 Likes
K/D for major nations being close to 1 or above 1 is pretty strong evidence that its OP. For them a balanced vehicle is going to sit anywhere from 0.6-0.8
If a minor nation has got a K/D of below 1 then something’s usually wrong and its overtiered.
If a vehicle is in both then average them out but have more emphasis on the minor nation
1 Like
So basically since Mi-28NM has global K/D of 2.27
and AH-64E has global K/D of 2.44
then, by your staitment… AH-64E is not bad and the JAGMs, even with incorrect flight path and being intercepted by the current Pantsir S1, are better at killing then the “muH oP” LMURs…
…ergo, all the bitching about Mi-28 and LMUR is just becous its russian… and all the bitching about the new Patsir is for the same reason.
And that, my friend…here we are now
1 Like
It might be even though your global stats are misleading since they include Mi28NM stats before the LMUR addition.
No the bitching is there, because it’s still selective realism to the benefit of a single tech tree
You keep asking that as if anybody here owed you an answer, like why don’t you do it yourself? Grab a t-72/t-80 and win games yourself to see if they are really that good as you claims lol maybe grab the bmpt?
Bro just go to stat shark select Jan 2026 and select heli and select 13.0
What did you do? lol?
1 Like
23 10.7 GRB games played in a row (as the U.S.).
10 victories, among them :
- 6 victories against Russia ;
- 4 victories along with Russia.
So Russia got 13 + 4 = 17 victories out of 23 games => 17/23 = 73.91% winrate.
I said I didn’t make the maths but knew NATO winrate would be between 0-30% lol.
Huh, what can I say except russian bias
Just did and show it (NATO side though).
Fair enough
Mi-28NM with 2.65 K/D
AH-64E with 2.26 K/D
Z-10ME with 2.78 K/D
Why is nobody calling the CM-502KG or the Blue arrow 11 OP? Why there aren’t threads like “The Z-10ME problem” ? Becouse it’s not russian… that is why.
CM502 have been bad after they have been released, they were good in the Dev server, but useless on live server, explains why they added BA11
main issue of the Mi28NM is that it can counter any heli, even the new ones without any problems
and the fact its LMURS have absurd loft compared to any other helicopter fired ATGM
Meanwhile, my M1A2 Abrams:
1 Like
Because the Z10 despite being better suffers from the same selective realism problems
Comrade, comrade you missing again… pls look at the spawn number between Z10ME and M28MN
it is better for air to air and air to ground due to the selection
but if you wanna fight off other helis mi28NM wins no doubt
I dont know… I dont have it. I just look at the stats, becous someone said that “stats mather”. I usually avoide commenting on vechicles that I personaly haven’t used… but cince people that havent a single USSR/Russian vechicle coment on them… well F it… I will do it to.
Comrade, ever heard of data analysis? Its a legit job. Comrade should learn it too
1 Like