Hows that fake KH38MT cope you got going? Russian mains are the biggest crybabies and get all the fake stuff 😂😂😂
if they get KH38 MT i want my panther 2 75mm
and flak 341
Since certain Russian mains find it funny to post bs in every US main post I make, I’ll bring up some bias.
Autoloader tanks still able to load and fire when the autoloader is destroyed
Explosion chance of ammunition in t-series tanks below the average explosion rates of ammunition of other MBTS
Nato counterparts with manual loaders and blowout panels have their ammo unloaded from an already loaded cannon when the ammo rack is shot.
Seems like an unfair advantage to me.
1 Like
we gonna skip over the fact the russians get the best MG 151 ingame ?
SU30/34 carrying russian winrate
You aren’t being able to load a shell if your autoloader is destroyed.
Source ?
1 Like
Me when I see some one nation wonder crying about Russian bias while driving around in a Leopard 2:
3 Likes
You seem to have trouble comprehending my argument. I’m not arguing with you on what DIRCM can do, I’m arguing with you on it’s effectiveness in GRB while spaa is present. Something you think it’s not effective when looking at your prior post.
Like I said before, you stating “facts” doesn’t mean anything when you can’t support your opinions.
Look at the Z-10ME, it has only 8 agms. Agms that require direct LOS, is SALH, and takes significantly longer to hit targets (comparing that too a vikhr). Why does it have the highest KD among all helicopters in the game? You ever thought about that? Now what is the biggest difference between the Z-10ME and the Z-10? Why does Z-10ME have nearly double the KD compared to the Z-10?
Take a good minute to think about that Alvis
Only if it’s SACLOS SAMs, which many people are swapping it for the new spaa. the new spaa IR or radar have a high chance of missing their targets when it’s stationary and DIRCM.
ever heard of sample size? I suggest you look it up.
PS. for the ones that flagged my previous post, a moderator has deemed nothing wrong with it and have unhiddened the post. Community Flags is not a tool for censorship but rather an easy measure to stop people from harming the discussion which my post is not doing.
Lmao, Russian players are usually the least of the crybabies. Its always the US players crying about T-80s, T-72s, T-90s, Pantsir, and CAS non-stop. Do you see Swedish, French, Italian, Israeli, Chinese players complaining? Very, very rarely.
4 Likes
I’ve seen this happen often when playing the HSTVL/RDFLT.
Destroyed autoloader, explosion, doesn’t die, I get one shot. Maybe he wasn’t reloading. Well if it was balanced, then it should unload the ammo in the gun when the autoloader is destroyed like it does when racking a nato tank.
@HondaCivici
Because most SPAA is not IR missiles.
Most top SPAA is at least 12km radar, which defeats helicopters in War Thunder.
Crotale [2 systems], Roland VT-1, ADATS [2 systems], 2S6 [if you’re brave], Pantsir, HQ-17, Tor-M1, OSA [if you’re brave], and either currently or in the future SPYDER, Type 81, and SLAMRAAM.
Vs… SLM, Type 81?, and CS/SA5.
I do not care that SPAA and helicopters can hypothetically stalemate each other because that’s part of my argument.
A stalemate between Ka-52/Apache and ADATS/ITO is still a win for the SPAA team.
Fragging the helicopters are obviously ideal, but in situations where you can’t, keeping them from hitting tanks is the primary goal anyway.
That is why I don’t take skill based arguments as anything other than proving my point.
“Players are switching.” is another skill based argument. What you choose to bring is battlefield awareness.
Me? I still bring nothing, though if enough players switch to the three IR SPAA I might stock grind my SPAA against helicopters which would be a nice change of pace.
Mass data on vehicles is a skill based argument. Cool, Z-10ME players are on-average of higher skill.
If you want to look for vehicle disparity among the statistical record you have to look at single profiles and build a factor using their data. Then build factors using other peoples’ data.
I looked up a player I trust to be consistent with his helicopter skills [Hunter_i86]. And to my unsurprise, his performance in Z-10ME, Ka-52, and Mi-28NM are not notable. They are entirely within expectations.
Said factor could be in my case, I have a KDR factor of less than 2:1 among SPGs, but my KDR factor of JPZ4 is closer to 4:1 because it’s OP at 4.3.
And we lose a crew member for it, which is essentially your HP bar, and pretty much all russian autoloaders have some of the slowest reloads in game.
We can’t hide our ammo entirely in blowout panel racks like other tanks
1 Like
Mathematics say this isn’t probable, and evidence say these had no positive impact on win rates.
The highest claimed win rates for the Soviet tech tree were prior to their additions, which makes sense since mathematically an all-tank rollout is a superior use of spawn points than CAS.
It doesn’t…
HEI round:
APHE round:
No they don’t. Loaded cannons don’t lose ammo unless you shoot the cannon except on Sturmtiger.
There’s a notable bump between his Z-10 and Z-10ME stats for K/D 1.65 (51/31) vs 2.24 (47/21) in almost half the total games.
And further discrepancy in the Death / flyout ratio of; 0.44(31/70) vs, 0.74(20/27) so it should be obvious which is more survivable.
In RB battles you have to count aircraft as well. Those aren’t AI, those are potential threats to your team mates.
As for “flyouts”, are you going to double down on arguing the Z-10ME is less survivable?
Not really, no most people don’t go after Aircraft in helicopters neither are the vast majority well equipt to do so, so taking advantage of one of the few that can isn’t fair and somewhat leans on abusing game mechanics due to the fixed spawns and being able to camp with little risk behind spawns, and avoids needing to care about the impact of the Heli-PvP on stat lines.
Where did I state this? also you may be reading the numbers backwards, It’s , Z-10 then Z-10ME for both, you can tell due to the fact that the Z-10ME hasn’t been spawned 70 times.
Neither can the M1, there is a first order rack in the base of the turret that holds a few rounds.
Radar missiles are not reliable at all against helis, SARH or ARH
Being high altitude (like most russian players) can cause near misses, which can cause the missile to proxy. It’s not surprising handheld folks would get confused
Being reliable is different than being immune.
Do you have any sources to this claim. Climbing in a heli is a death sentence since you can easily be killed by any plane or SPAA.
Saying Russian vehicles are handheld doesn’t make it true.
1 Like