T80UE1 cant see 13.0 where russia has the biggest advantage over other nations though.
Unless statshark isn’t able to separate 12.0+ brackets?
I mean it took them ~6 years to finally give the ADATS the ability to third person lock with it’s radar, so I wouldn’t be so sure about that.
Ya i guess im just shitposting a bit
Hasnt even played it, but knows its better then everything…
1 Like
Gaijin employees consistently play their game.
Soviet vehicles require the same strict documentations and things have not been changed without said documentation.
No weapon has been artificially buffed, and R-27ER’s speed is based on documentation.
Next you’ll claim Fakour 90’s speed is artificial.
Soyuz is not unrealistic in the slightest, even if it’s OP. The documents are all available.
Pantsir was bad and still is because top BR doesn’t use LGBUs as main munition.
Soviets never ruled the skies. F-15, Gripen, etc.
1 Like
the natural cycle
2 Likes
Pantsir would be fine if the radar just worked, and its not even a balance or power thing as much as it is extremely frustrating to play.
A helis spamming agms/rockets at you renders your radar useless, a plane spamming rockets, having launches ruined because the plane you shot at fired a missile/rocket, having chaff pull the lock, etc. etc.
Of all the SPAA I’ve played I feel like it has the highest potential for skill expression via manual leading of the missile which is absolutely necessary to hit targets out past 8km that aren’t just flying straight like morons, you need to know where to start the missile relative to the plane in non headon aspects (if you start the launch on the plane and its side aspect 12km away its just not going to hit), you need to know where it is in flight relative to the plane and when to lead in etc. It would be a ton of fun to play if the radar just worked correctly, there is nothing more frustrating then having your launches cooked because when it gets pulled off target it bleeds a ton of energy and basically wastes that launch or close range cooks it completely.
This also means its extremely suboptimal to use the radar screen on the pantsir because the auto lead is terrible compared to good manual lead from the player. Not to mention the auto missile track function on the new radar screen suffers from the same bug where you start a launch on a plane, and it just switches target to any fired missile, rocket etc. and unlike manual control you have no chance to correct at all its just a failed launch. It also doesn’t let you do things like curve shots over a hill/mountain a heli is peeking, or give you the option to just free aim without radar lock at things spamming crap at you so you actually have a chance in hell of hitting them.
2 Likes
I lack the advanced vocabulary required to describe the level of ineptitude and mental insufficiency possessed by the ‘average player’. Let’s not use them as a metric; it brings us non-amoebalikes no good to do so.
Brave stance. Last I checked, every gun in the game is accurate far beyond IRL equivalencies. Laserlike, in fact.
But I doubt its overload rate is. Call me skeptical; I don’t think that Russia could make a missile going Mach 6 pull 35Gs in 1984.
Napkinwaffe is unrealistic.
MiG-23MLD patch.
All guns in War Thunder are at “worst” less accurate than real life.
R-27ER wasn’t made in 1984, it was made in 1990.
And “35G” at mach 5.8 is less maneuverability than R-27R.
Russian planes rule the sky: 😠😠😠
Rafales rule the sky: 😴😴😴
My favorite “Russian bias”:
KH-38MT has better thermal imager then top line Russian attack helicopter… considering how advanced thermal imager production in Russia is it is clearly NOT a marketing lie…
Meanwhile AGM-65D spent over 3 years with incorrect FOV (zoom) and nobody from Gaijin bothered…
It took several years to tone down Vikh missiles to somewhat realistic performance (remember how Vikhr helicopters could take on SAM ?)…
Meanwhile Hellfire, PARS, Spike etc are missing their top attack capabilities from the beginning…
Why Gainin did not develop regenerative/differential steering…?
PUMA MUSS was implemented visible in night vision because manufacturer clearly lied in in their marketing material …
Examples are endless 😂
3 Likes
its getting worse day by day!!! Its beyond a joke! T-34s now bouncing everything, everywhere so on so forth.!!!
155mm pen shells on a plate 60mm thick… hmmmm let me thinks.!! Dead… nope!! Bounce…!!! 3 times. and im dead.!!! YAY
Turn them into laser weapons and all your wishes can come true.
Yeah I don’t know how one would even begin to justify that. The Vikhr was actually the most diabolical example of favoritism at the time. You could launch 12 of them at once, they could pull nearly 18Gs, they could proxy trigger SAMs, smoke didn’t matter for beam riders and they stayed like that for nearly 3 years. Then when everyone started getting some competent CAS counterparts they conveniently added the Pantsir, which until very recently, was the most difficult SPAA to deal with.
yea vikhr was wayy to op and was added wayy too early , but tbh SAMs are still ineffective against CAS. CAS is still op atm.
Damn I missed that, would have made the su39/35t a lot more fun than it is now lol. Vikhrs would be the perfect meme missile in arb if they pulled more than they do now. Kh25ml and kh38 are king right now for that stuff.
same goes for any other laser guided missile
there is nothing stopping you from launching 16 hellfires in your apache
1 Like
I don’t know why people who have little to no experience with helicopters in GRB spout the lie that helicopters are useless because of spaa.
Unequivocally false. Even after the “nerfs” (making flight model, vikhrs more realistic. doesn’t mean they are accurate), they are one of the strongest helicopters in the game. It’s for that reason why it’s the most played helicopter while also maintaining one of the best winrates.
Only until now, a lot of helicopters has become near useless because of the new spaa except for two. The Z-10ME and the Mi-28NM.
I think this needs to be said:
“You can own a library, but that doesn’t make you a scholar.”