Exactly, disabled camera verical angle puts the source of the shot just about in the area of the certain ricoched. Anly slight deviation from that angle and the dart goes through since it is not about effective thikness.
flarakrad was ass. now you get to feel the treatment we had when the spaa is not the best anymore.
glad i have my iris t slm now after a long pain.
The flak was just bad period, the Pantsir is being artificially nerfed by ignoring its prominent issues
1 Like
ok. have fun being simulated as germany now.
Or it’s because we would see your stats and your claims would be exposed as beeing nothing more than rumors and excuses of bad players.
4 Likes
That goes for any tank at top-tier.
- Slight downward angle and a T-80U’s UFP is suddenly vulnerable to M829A2.
- Slight downward angle and a M1’s UFP is suddenly vulnerable to DM53.
- Slight downward angle and a Strv 122’s upper glacis plate is suddenly vulnerable to 3BM-60.
- Etc.
But you’re not going to above your enemies at all times, so that’s not a realistic portrayal of engagements.
The most accurate way to measure frontal armour using the Armour Analysis Tool is to always zoom back as far as you can, and place the camera level with the centre of the hull.
1 Like
Pantsir still better than everything else lol cope harder
Its at 1.07 for this month while the IRIST is at 1.7
Its radar still hasn’t been fixed and makes it extremely unfun to play.
Anyone that thinks the pantsir is better let alone on the same level of the IRIST is literally smoking crack.
3 Likes
The Ariete AMV and Merkava Mk.4’s have great mobility. The other Arietes (1200HP) and other Merkavas have poor-mediocre mobility.
A whole YEAR before the BVM, btw. Russian bias surely.
2 Likes
Imo Russian Bias exists but more so through Gaijin’s consistently being inconsistent, and being ignorant by not playing their own game.
I mean just look at all the bs with bug fixes, sometimes documents are easily accepted for fixing a Russian vehicle with barely any validation of it, whereas a fix for a western vehicle requires a full 4k video and a document signed by the president.
Ingame too there can be a few issues for instance; fuel tanks not exploding, artificially buffed equipment such as the R-27ER’s speed, or the whole dilemma with Russian turret rings VS Leopard 2/Abram turret rings. One notable problem though was with the Soyuz being put into the game based on unrealistic paper stats. But who plays naval lmao
One bit of drama too was the claim of Russian bias in toptier ground, specifically with the Pantsir being added to the game with no other nation getting an equal counterpart letting Russia rule the skies. Until recently with the addition of new SPAA’s in the Leviathans update did that change, but you could attribute this to just Gaijin switching whose got the most bias for the season. I still say theres definitely
1 Like
Top tier just got raped by the rafale for months because they accepted hud footage from an airshow where the poster mislead everyone saying it was 50% fuel even though its clear what the fuel was at the in video and wasn’t fixed until recently. No russian plane has every had anything on this level happen.
Rafale was performing as if it was missing 30%+ fuel at all loads for months.
4 Likes
Internal fuel tanks can fail to explode on pretty much all vehicles that have them.
Suddenly people forgot about Leclercs not having turret ring in game.
French bias ?
Meanwhile 9.0 nations are still missing their HE-VT AAs but USA got it years ago with M247.
US bias ?
@Sternlos
Regardless of that being true or not, just imagine what would’ve happened if Rafale was in the USSR TT.
6 Likes
Any other nation getting op stuff: 😴😴😴
Russia getting something good: 😠😠😠
Russia top tier has garbage tanks compared to the one it may face: poor reverse speed, no depression, 6 second autoloaders that can’t be improved and no ammo safety. Planes that are either missile bus or can only fly straight and are easy picking for Rafales and Eurofighters.
Russia gets a few unicorns to even out the field and everyone calls it bias, the new SPAAs hard counter every advantage Russia had and the WR are down into the ground.
4 Likes
T-80s might not be the best, but are far from garbage.
Lol only 1 or 2 of the new AAs are acfually good, the others are either mid or straight up garbage.
1 Like
I still think if the pantsir was american it would have it radar fixed a year ago. No one was allowed to complain about the pantsir because it was OP+Russian. I could easily see the KD of it going up 50% if you didn’t have to deal with dropped locks constantly.
1 Like
I’m pretty certain that has more to do with the T-80U-E1 sales.
Russia is getting the Click-Bait treatment.
1 Like
T80UE1 cant see 13.0 where russia has the biggest advantage over other nations though.
Unless statshark isn’t able to separate 12.0+ brackets?
I mean it took them ~6 years to finally give the ADATS the ability to third person lock with it’s radar, so I wouldn’t be so sure about that.
Ya i guess im just shitposting a bit