Yea i also heard from russia higgers that t54 is3 and t55a arent good
I dont buy this
T90 is great and better then most other mbts
IS-3 is free SL for my T34
It’s overhyped because bad players struggle against it.
I would rather play every other top tier MBT, besides the T-72B3A, over the T-90M.
1 Like
Lucky u cuz my is3 beat the sh*t out of t34 and tigers 2(
Sorry for the delayed reply looks like your replies got buried.
Good then you admit that you aren’t reading what I’m putting donw.
And thats not the only thing that changes when barrel life expires.
Thats like, your opinon.
Oh dont play dumb when you make this comment next
Wow, its almost like thats something I said and I’m mocking you for not picking up on that … AGAIN.
You literally just proved to me that you do not.
Thats once again your opinion.
Yes, such issues should be the case, I’m glad you understand why gaijin’s selective realism is bad.
Wow, its almost like I’ve said exactly that for a long while and you’ve kept harping on nose fused HE because it suits your argument. Also important note US BBs could get SAP in the form of bombardment rounds but gaijin wont give them such, I wonder why.
Skill issue, I barbette penned the same test range ship as you.
I have not at any point in my arguments, you are outright lying here for your own failing argument’s sake.
Incorrect as well lmao.
This is seriously just sad, you are so high and mighty but have said nothing coherent this entire time.
Wow, look at that you highlighted the nation I said had no large caliber SAP, funny how that works.
And I could quote reply everything else but thats irrelevant as I already said that the US is the outlier and not relevant to the situation.
Now lets remove the US and wow would you look at that, just like I said more ships sport more SAP/BFHE with HE fused ships sitting at 29 vs 33.
Your own count disproves this lol. Maybe you should go back and recount.
Thats gotta be one of the most obvious strawman attempts I’ve seen on this site so far.
You went totally off the rails are are speaking gibberish.
Cites the same 3 months that he’s been trying to buttress his argument with, try again m8.
Russians get LMUR missiles with top-attack capability against tanks, while PARS missiles and others never received that feature they also have in real life:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0EfDA6sXcBok
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/fBEdo7Ib3Vum
Concept of selective realism:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0Ai2EO0lBjda
To top it off we have the Brimstone missiles which never received their FNF capability with the excuse that it could break the game. But we can clearly see how much they care about that since they added LMUR missiles that completely dominate the upper tier and are by far the best FNF missiles in the game, with 12 kg of explosive mass compared to just 3 kg on other nations FNF missiles. The effectiveness of 8 LMUR missiles equals that of 32 PARS 3 missiles. How ridiculous is this bias?
3 Likes
I totally agree, the pars are almost useless, wich makes the Eurocpter not worth the grind. the brimstone should also get a buff. maybe not all of the real life features but atleast top attack and FF.
I could be wrong but. If you shoot them too close its obviously that they wont do top down attack.
The video on the Report you posted. Its not even top down attack. Its just flying at Chopper altitud and hitting the target. Almost at the same as the Ingame video you posted. The only diff i can thing of its that the one on your ingame video has more distance to the target than the IRL video. The missile in the IRL video don’t even try to climb after launch.
From February to August, Click Bait had the best WR out of all US MBTs at 11.7 in every single month except May. So yeah, it’s 6 months, not 3.
1 Like
The 7.7 T-54 is good, IS-3 is mediocre, and the T-55A is decent.
All amazing
Is3 does have lower kill potential cuz the reload but exept that its great