Sure, and IRL it’s perfectly normal for a APFSDS round to be totally absorbed by a fuel tank.
Also, you can’t tell russian mains “aim somewhere else if you want to pen NATO MBTs bro”, because NATO MBTs can literally be pened from anywhere.
Russian MBTs = easy mode, NATO MBTs = hard mode.
“Russian bias doesn’t exist bro, skill issue, Leclercs perfectly balanced bro”
Yes actually, diesel fuel was used to cover ammo in T-XX tanks because it doesn’t explode and absorbs shrapnel.
Skill issue.
Skill issue.
The famous and magical russian fuel, covering the wet soviet ammo racks ? :clown:
Conveniently, you didn’t answer this part of my response : “Also, you can’t tell russian mains “aim somewhere else if you want to pen NATO MBTs bro”, because NATO MBTs can literally be pened from anywhere.”, because you know it’s the truth lmao
Abrams and Leopard 2s are the easiest tanks to use at top BR for me as they fire meta rounds while having mobility. The turret armor is a bonus as well.
I know, I know… the turret baskets.
Somehow people lose their turret baskets without losing their engines or crew.
The way I play if I lose my turret basket, I’m just in the respawn menu regardless cause they hit 3 crew members.
I’ve easily seen myself cause more turrets fly in-game than have flown in real life.
All fuel tanks in War Thunder is treated the same.
Another case of grass always greener on the other side, like my cousin went to australia then come back after three years (she said here is better bro) lol I saw your record, your soviet tech tree progress is currently at ww2 territory. I suggest bro start playing them more until the top tier so see if they are really as good as people claims, maybe grab the T-72AV or T-80UD to try it and see if you can do the same thing your Leclerc could do bro
Russian MBTs don’t need to fire meta rounds as NATO MBTs have cardboard armors which can literally be pened from anywhere even with the weakest APFSDS round.
12.7 Russian MBTs are barely less mobile than NATO MBTs.
In other words, for russian and NATO MBTs having more or less the same mobility, we have :
Sure, you can always flank russian MBTs, but as every single map is conveniently too small to do that, Russians always win, rushing you in corners, hugging you while spawncamping, etc.
I wonder if IRL, it is documented that NATO forces chose to build MBTs with cardboard armors, and that Russia has the best MBTs in the world in that mater.
30kph reverse speed vs -4kph/-10kph same? bro they ain’t the same lol and btw armor is only one of the metrics for survivability bro, why rely on armor when your NATO’s can choose not to get hit?
Now try 12.7, as that’s the BR everyone aims to play, because nobody wants to be stuck under that in endgame.
NATO MBTs are paper which can be pened from literally everywhere, russia MBTs are concrete walls.
Abrams and Leopard turrets are over 700mm in thickness.
Turret are statistically more likely to be targeted in a panicked situation than hulls.
All MBTs have the same CQC weakspots of idler wheels [side armor].
Getting penned with a round means failing to fulfill 3 layers of the survival onion to begin with.
Mobility prevents to don’t be hit part.
Don’t be seen, don’t be shot at, don’t be hit.
The only Soviet MBT with mobility close to NATO is the BVM, a tank that has the weakest turret of Soviet MBTs above 10.7.
Soviet MBTs work worse on small maps due to how their armor prefers medium and long range engagements.
You must love defending Soviet tanks.
I have. Many times. In the thousands. Russian MBTs are the worst at top tier.
I watch how russian MBTs are pened compared to NATO MBTs. I watch armor modelisations from different angles with different APFSDS all day long.
I’ve watched for 1500 hours how hard it is to progress as a NATO force compared to Russia forces, who can just rush you in your spawn in less than 3 minutes without being pened easily.
The tiny russian MBTs weakspots impossible to hit when T-90M rush your corner at 60km/h VS the NATO weakspots everywhere on the tank. Point, click, boom dead too bad.
The game is poorly balanced, that is a fact
You don’t need to reverse when you’re unkillable and just spawnkill every ennemy in their spawn.
Bro we did the stats on the other topic the other day. Russia wins every 12.7 game, they rush you at your spawn in less than 3 minutes. It’s well known and proven
I keep hearing NATO mains said something like this, then found out some of them actually own some t-series and then they have an embassaring kd as low as 0.5, like where is the vibranium walls they claims it has just to trade TWO vehicles for one kill on average?
Now that I remember this guy (infamous US main) creates a name for himself when he continues to BS his way to deceive people whenever people start calling him out for the nonsense lol
Chit is just too meme-able bro can’t help
Yes. This. Unless you’re preaiming at hulls or lfp’s, you’re gonna hit their turret
Russian MBTs don’t need to shoot at NATO turrets, as they know they have cardboard hulls able to be pened from anywhere at any angle.
They don’t need mobility, as they can’t be pened anyway. They don’t need to be invisible, as they can’t be pened anyway.
Russian MBTs rush you at 60km/h in small urban maps, you shoot and miss the tiny weakspot, they shoot anywhere on your hull, you die. Simple as that.
Stop lying man, nobody can trust you with such a claim.
Play 50 games against 12.7 GRB Russia as a NATO force, and tell me how many games your team wins.
It’s not a coincidence if Russia + China have 80% winrate in 12.7 sim, and that everybody complains about Russian bias. You never heard about french, italian or japanese bias. There is a reason.
No use bro, you can continue to only play NATO’s for another 10,000 hours and never touch other tech tree, your judgements on the vehicles you had never played will always be stink bro. The good thing is your experience of NATO’s vehicles is interchangeable when it comes to playing other vehicles with similar features, where ru have to be played a certain ways to do well because of their limited mobility and gun depression, to do well not just 1:1 kd to call it a day because any orange cat can get 1KD on any vehicles by holding w to the objective point bro
You can check my statcard for proof.
To be honest, my positive kd comes from the fact I destroyed 85% of russian MBTs from the side.
If I had to face every russian MBTs I ever encountered, I would have destroyed way, way less of them. And in comparaison, they would have destroyed be way easily.
They just have to point at the hull anywhere, while I would have to aim at specific areas (LFP, driver hatch, breech). Sometimes, the LFP angle makes the shot bounce. Sometimes, you can’t even see the whole hull itself. Sometimes, they have bushes everywhere and you can’t see the driver hatch (plus there is that weird bug with motion blur mixing the armor and the bushes in a blurry thing). Sometimes, they do the same with the breech.
Russians, they just have to aim at your hull and shoot. No bushes can hide it.
It’s just unfair.
