Russian Bias in 2025?

JAJAJAAJA DONT SAY sh-
The “Rusian bias” its death since 2017

Patriot isn’t ready. That’s all.
Blow out panels weren’t nerfed, they now act as they’ve acted on the release of blowout panels again.
T-80B having thermals is why it’s 10.7 instead of 10.3.
2S6M has thermals IRL.
Same with BMP3 which is correctly BR’d.

Your entire post is proving there’s no Russian bias.

I’ve also had M829A2 bounce off the 2A4 mantlet twice, so German bias now too?

Now this is a split between either super unlucky or skill issue.

Why is it that I have a great time playing almost all nations at top tier, except maybe Israel (which just keeps getting fucked over by Gaijin on the ground)?

Same goes for the Z-10ME and AH-64E that have LDIRCM?

3 Likes

Oh, and by the way all three relevant reports are still awaiting implementation.

It’s been more than a year since they were “Accepted”, at this point.

And we can’t get later Stingers for the ATAL, because…

AH-64E V6 Radar

4 Likes

Z10me doesnt have fnf and ah64e have crap fnf
And most important this nation lacks in other areas when russia doesn not

Yep. I for one cannot wait until we get Meteor (or the borked version Gaijin will give us - cough - Brimstone).

‘We looked at R-3R and Meteor. They both have pointy end and are painted white - so it IS nOt REaLiStIC for Meteor to be substantially better.’

Translation: Russian technology can do X. Western technology superficially looks like Russian technology. Ergo it must only be capable of X also…

(Leaving out the bit where Russian technology is about 2 decades behind that of the West in many respects).

1 Like

The CM502s were added last update.

Like they are absolutely garbage, but they are still FnF.

Right forgot about that tbh but they arent strong as the lamur as u said so like ah64e
and again chaina lacks in other areas which create the balance
Russia is strong at everything
Great mbts
Best op spaa
Best cas
Best helis
Idk if best but also great light tanks

2 Likes

2 Likes

Almost everything. I agree with the CAS and helis, but they only have 1 MBT that can be considered great. Everything else hovers between solid and mediocre.

1 Like

I disagree
While 2a7 and strvs are better t90m is also great
And even if t80bvm is the only good one its like other nations
Germany has only one 2a7 and so does italy
Sweden has few strvs but that have thir tradeoff like thermals and shells

Yea i said i frogot about ths bit they are bad anyway

most of FnF that not Russian one has crap damages output being PARS Spike or whatever
feel like Gaijin did it on purpose
how many times you one shot MBT with nato FnF ATGM compare to Russian?

True
Its part of the bias
Pars arent that bad compare to spikes but yea its some bs stuff

T-90M is mid as hell. It’s probably the most overhyped vehicle at top tier.

EDIT: 2S38 is also a contender for most overhyped vehicle at high/top tier though.

1 Like

Yea i also heard from russia higgers that t54 is3 and t55a arent good
I dont buy this
T90 is great and better then most other mbts

IS-3 is free SL for my T34

It’s overhyped because bad players struggle against it.

I would rather play every other top tier MBT, besides the T-72B3A, over the T-90M.

1 Like

Lucky u cuz my is3 beat the sh*t out of t34 and tigers 2(

Sorry for the delayed reply looks like your replies got buried.

Good then you admit that you aren’t reading what I’m putting donw.

And thats not the only thing that changes when barrel life expires.

Thats like, your opinon.

Oh dont play dumb when you make this comment next

Wow, its almost like thats something I said and I’m mocking you for not picking up on that … AGAIN.

You literally just proved to me that you do not.

Thats once again your opinion.

Yes, such issues should be the case, I’m glad you understand why gaijin’s selective realism is bad.

Wow, its almost like I’ve said exactly that for a long while and you’ve kept harping on nose fused HE because it suits your argument. Also important note US BBs could get SAP in the form of bombardment rounds but gaijin wont give them such, I wonder why.

Skill issue, I barbette penned the same test range ship as you.

I have not at any point in my arguments, you are outright lying here for your own failing argument’s sake.

Incorrect as well lmao.

This is seriously just sad, you are so high and mighty but have said nothing coherent this entire time.

Wow, look at that you highlighted the nation I said had no large caliber SAP, funny how that works.

And I could quote reply everything else but thats irrelevant as I already said that the US is the outlier and not relevant to the situation.

Now lets remove the US and wow would you look at that, just like I said more ships sport more SAP/BFHE with HE fused ships sitting at 29 vs 33.

Your own count disproves this lol. Maybe you should go back and recount.

image

Thats gotta be one of the most obvious strawman attempts I’ve seen on this site so far.

You went totally off the rails are are speaking gibberish.

Cites the same 3 months that he’s been trying to buttress his argument with, try again m8.