Then a counter is to check a section of players who complain about US or French or Swedish vehicles. I suspect you’ll find a similar rogues gallery of players you don’t want too many of on your team.
=)
1 Like
That is also true (except for the Leopard 2A7/122s, they are just too good for 12.0).
Single nation mains that aren’t very good generally have this “grass is always greener on the other side” and they act like if they had the tools of said other nation they would suddenly do well in the game. It’s so frustrating to deal with.
There is this saying in english I believe along the lines of “a good workman never blames their tools” which applies to those cases.
So you are just ignoring the whole post?
0 balanc is now in toptier vs russia for example i start with heli"tiger uht" and mi28 fire missile on me from enemy heli spone but u no have chance because is from 10 km good luck most unbalanced update ever…
I got you
3 Likes
As I said depends on BR.
It could be good but it’s big has that good old reverse speed issue
Fire power is decent but it has no turret armour negating the power of the hull.
SPAA needed to be powercrept.
CLAWS is the MINIMUM needed to deal with F-15E, Rafale, Su-34, etc.
Pantsir, CS/SA5, Spyder, Tan-SAM Kai, and Elde aren’t enough.
LMUR with 20kg TNT overpressuring better than Maverick with 50kg XD
4 Likes
Well it’s been programed to loft correctly and aim directly for turret weakspots (cupolas, hatches and ammo racks), while everyone else gets piss poor guidance
Not even
what u got?:D
Fnf missiles are coded to go for a random module of whatever it is fired at
You can see it the best when you spam some fnf missiles at the ships in the test drive and observe what they are targeting
They changed that around a year ago iirc, before that fnf missiles always went for center of mass
Well perhaps gaijin could make it so that my spikes don’t aim for the modules protected by the absolute thickest part of any given tank’s armour next time
1 Like
if you think that gaijin is that competent then you are overestimating them
“yeah so a T-72 hull with a twin 30mm, 4 ataka and Relikt era is a bag of crap”
You’re trolling, right? It would definitely be a high tier vehicle. 100%
I didn’t say it wouldn’t and yes it would be a bag of crap it’s whole turret is a weakness.
If they model it like other vehicles shooting the missile tubes should 1 hit kill it.
The BMP-2M is very well playable, so I don’t see why the Terminator wouldn’t be. It’s rare for me to die from the tubes being hit by ammunition.
Most of the times I ever get killed is from a direct hit in the hull with shells or heavy MG.
And on the contrary, its turret would be a good advantage as it isn’t crewed (2S38 has a relatively good survivability thanks to that).
Why wouldn’t you? It’s what Gaijin does, afterall.
For the record, I don’t believe that Russian Bias™ exists, but Gaijin going down the route of applying the most blithely optimistic assumptions about Sovetsky Soyuz’s non-verifiable stats and capabilities
plays into the hands of those people that do, notwithstanding the past and future introduction of never completed ships for other nations, and their assorted stats.
In her current state and with the current damage model in place, Soyuz simply is OP (as in, is the overwhelmingly clear favourite facing anything in her BR range when used in a 1v1 against an equally skilled opponent) to an unholy degree, even more so than Scharnhorst in her heyday.
I have mothballed mine after spading it, and that will remain the case until her stats get adjusted and/or a truly viable counterpart emerges for the other nations.
You know, if those shells would be fired by even remotely comparable guns from vehicles that aren’t 6 BRs and however many decades of technological advancement apart, your strawman wouldn’t appear quite so rotund.
1 Like
Sooo a russian tank taking m829A2 into the breach making it orange is ok(Full pen right side of the gun)?
while mine was disabled in one shot…
the same GAME 3x m829a2 got stopped fully by a ERA block while my abrams got mauled by a one shot to the front plate… like how is that russian tanks from the front have to be aimed at a weakspot while us and other tank get shreaded all around exept the turret cheeks?
Why it is when I play russians with some prem tanks for top tier experience I am able to ply and have fun while other nations I get pissed off because of me getting slapped left to right by cheeky shots?
LMUR… How to shoot it down using the new SPAA systems if it is immune?.. One shot kill to 4 shot kills with hellfires/spikes/chinease F&f …
Why is it that russkies have BUK while US has a damn claws? like hellow early patriot exists which is on par with buk ?
Aaaan nerfing the blowout panels while you hti the carousel or ammo and what happens? …
Gaijin is pushing hard with their selective realism, making ammo explosions ignore blowout pannels but allowing engine fire to set of the ammo in the protected ammorack
Giving the BMP3 the 2s6 and the T80B Thermals as a module to be researched and for everything else adding a completely new vehicle or even not adding them at all becouse only a few units were equiped with them? (The T80B Thermals never left prototype stage, the BMP3 w Themals are really fckn rare)