Buddy just play Top Tier, it happens on a daily basis or just watch a video.
So you cant prove it, thanks for admitting.
It comes mostly from people with bellow average skill set and no or barely any played Russian vehicles.
1 Like
Oh true i misread that one. You used the conspiracy one as a comparison which is almost dumber than what i thought you meant since…
…is just an unproven claim by you and has nothing to with conspiracy theories at all so that begs the question why you would even bring up conspiracy theories.
You quite literally do not, because thats not a gotcha thats just the expected normal distribution.
I can absolutely prove it, i just don’t wanna waste energy going into my replays.
And the counterargument stems mostly from a diverse, not russia playing, objective group of people?
No, from people playing multiple nations including Russia.
1 Like
yeah so pretty much as unobjective as the other group.
???
It is based on an observed thing.
And it is perfect to bring it up because the russian bias belief is a conspiracy theory.
Just like with the majority of the humans being average height, the most people in game are average…
Great, then prove it!
How is a group that played accused Nation as unobjective as all the cry babies that never did ? A lot of them even only play only one Nation.
1 Like
Ok so i was right in my initial assessment that your argument is: Russian bias = Conspiracy, Conspiracy theory believers = stupid ------> believers in russian bias = stupid?
Bruh…they are average compared to the playerbase, because they are the average of the playerbase. That does not mean that the average player is not objectively bad at the game.
@Ghost_of_TelAviv
Because they still profit from the theoretical bias just as much as the other group suffers from it. Which is why player opinions generally belong in the trash since no one is objective.
He doesn’t. He compares similar situations:
- Less educated people are quicker to believe in conspiracy theories
- Less skilled players are quicker to believe in Russian Bias.
Nowhere is it implied that people who believe in Russian Bias also believe in (other) conspiracy theories.
and whats that then? If hes not suggesting that russian bias believers are dumb then his comparison makes even less sense, because those 2 things have nothing to do with each other
Not at all, one actually played everything and has a good record that shows he understands the vehicle strengths and weaknesses, another one (mostly US mains) has a record that shows that he plays like dog💩 and makes a bunch of stupid claims, whose voice do you think holds more weight?
Click Bait has a higher win-rate than other M1A1s.
@MotorolaCRO was correct.
This is July 2025:
Not sure why you claim that US top tier has the worst teams…
@H_ngma
The Russian propaganda I see come from the same accounts claiming Russian bias exists.
Those that admit Russian bias doesn’t exist are typically those that also defend NATO equipment the most.
When all of the multi-tech tree players are admitting Russian bias doesn’t exist and defend NATO equipment, I tend to trust those posts over the ones saying that Soviet tanks have special magical powers that no other tech tree has.
I never once claimed that russian bias is vehicle strenght at all, the tanks are mid and always have been. My claim is that russian bias is favoritism when it comes to stuff like the KH38MT, Soyuz, Igla vs Stinger debate, the highly targeted additions of realistic modules and mechanics for tanks and generally the difference in acceptance of sources compared to other trees.
Dont put me in the “muh T80/T90 is the best tank in the game” mouthbreather group
Ok and?
Thats a you issue.
Once again.
Ok and?
You claimed that SAP and BFHE are bad against all well armored ships, its still a well armored ship and identical to the one you tested.
Nice strawman.
Fun fact these guns exist at 7.3 so they can face it unlike your strawman.
My post wasn’t targeting anyone, and especially not you.
It was me addressing narrative-based posts. If you never did those narratives, obviously I’m not critiquing your own posts.
Igla being the worst manpad, and Soyuz being yet another of over 20 laid down ships in War Thunder that won’t stop there [Lion class says hi].
Kh-38MT was the only missile that finally made Gaijin pay attention to how OP CAS was.
When F-16s and Harriers, and later Rafale and F-15E were dominating ground matches for years Gaijin did nothing.
Only when Su-34 was added did Gaijin finally admit CAS is OP and more powerful SPAA was needed.
So while there were [and potentially still are] issues with Kh-38MT, it is the reason Su-34, F-15E, and Rafale aren’t OP anymore.
What is the debate here ?
Igla is atrociously bad.
I’ve said it before, and i’ll say it again:
Awful players flock to what’s meta/popular (Russian top tier in this case, but previously stuff like the Rafale, Gripens, F-14, 2A7V, etc) and they’ll do that by crippling the matchmaker surrounding their chosen premium’s BR (J-7D, A-10/Su-25, Clickbait, T80UE1).
This is why I don’t believe in comparing nations VIA winrates (at top tier anyway) because it’s a fundamentally flawed metric given the sheer state of the matchmaker in the last 2ish years
2 Likes