or early jets like the me262
1 Like
Technically the H-39 (you know, the french reserve tier tank) should be around ~8.3 BR because it was in service in israel until the mid 1950s xd. A tank that is horrible even at reserve tier…
if there was fully historical matchmaking then ppl would cry even more about russian bias
because you would have the T-72 with 3BM22 only fighting against stuff that is currently around 8.0 in br
including the 8.0 AMX-30
in that cenerio the T-72 would basically be uncontested
1 Like
Full historical MM is only allowed at tiers where RU wouldn’t dominate.
so WW2 where germany would be absolutly OP
then a bit of the early cold war, until the T-64 and T-72 ver put into service
and then historical MM continues with the Leo2A5
Which is what my comment was supposed to refer to. I apologize profusely that didn’t add an essay about the funny temporal mismatch between some vehicles like in air rb the Me-163 (8.0, 1944) vs the F-117(8.7, 1981) for example.
There is even worse.
ARL-44 ACL-1 vs IS-7… Both from 1946. In fact, any non soviet nation from that era would suffer against IS-7s
Or Pz II vs KV-1/2, Matilda, B1…
Ha-Go vs Pershing.
Like in most cases the axis powers would have less than 5% win rate. It would be like the WWI event where one side withs almost always…
1 Like
i think they need more,
Do you have that on standby or did you really go through the effort of making that as an answer to a tounge-in-cheek comment to a (probably) tongue-in-cheek comment?
1 Like
no
No you don’t have that on standby or no you didn’t go through the effort? You’re sending mixed signals here pal
1 Like
at least tell the truth. only in the last 3 mouths (many btw), 3 of 7 mouths with best wr, not even 50% of the mouths (and this ONLY in statshark lol). but this may be hard to you comprehend
1 Like
Nice job picking the last 3 months of data which I’ve already explained is not when the US bracket was having issues to begin with.
Imagine my shock that the M1A1 clickbait and AIM and all other M1s are now doing good when the entire WR spread flipped in under a month from the US 11.7 having a 44% WR and 12.0 having a 43% to 50% and 47%.
Man I cant fathom how this trend suddenly inverted and is now different with Russia dropping in WRs.
Oh wait thats right, the T-80U-E1 zerg began and to this day is still feeding every other nation.
1 Like
This guy has been creaming the cccp nation on the forums for years he is coping hard and wont admit anything :)
Look at your profile and there is all you need to know about the so called Russian Bias.
This is to the SAP guy:
Salvo 3, APHE, 34% crew damage, fire in 2 barbettes (only 1 visible on screenshot), engine damage and engine fire. (dies to barbette fire)
Next test:
Next test:
In almost all cases APHE was much more reliable, did a LOT more damage, and mind you, this is a 7.0 battlecruiser (but using battleship guns) vs a 6.3 battleship, and SAP was often struggling.
SAP was relying on lucky shots to set barbette fires while APHE could reliably pen them.
And mind you this is as much of an idela scenario as it gets. In a real match SAP would struggle more.
My dude you are using Mackensen, a ship with some of the lowest preforming SAP of it’s caliber in the game.
Imagine my shock when any ship with even normal rounds preforms better.
How about we show a salvo from a ship with actual not garbage SAP/BFHE.
For instance, Gneisenau.
Wow, one salvo and a ammo rack, its just that easy.
Get good.
Oh and so you can’t say “You emptied your ammo rack trying to kill him”, here was the ammo load.
Terminator is a bag of crap, bigger slower BMP 2M with one extra gun.
Unless it’s BR is ridiculously low it will be pretty weak
Did i heard it right Strela-10M2 is hard counter to AH-64E ? Can anyone imagine that ?