Bruh, you deliberately chose May stat, because it was the best fit for your argument.
4 Likes
My brother in christ the original statement was this -
The stats are the same in April, March and February as well with the clickbaits and AIMs dragging down WRs or being almost the same.
I can laundry list them here if you want, but the fact is that for many months both vehicles have been dragging down WRs, the clickbait has not had the quote on quote “consistently best WR of all US 11.7 MBTs”, and the AIM is very visibly been sitting at a 40 to 44% WR for a long while.
Even now in August the AIM in particular is sitting at a 48% WR while the Clickbait and the other M1A1s are sitting at 50%.
Do you have any proofs of the worse accuracy?
And this is just a useless thing as the in game Mv is NOT the suggested higher MV, so it’s pointless.
Great. Even in naval EC you wont shoot 150 shells per barrel most of the time, let alone in random AB/RB matches. And since damage is repaired after each match, this should not pose an issue.
But hey, let’s see:
Pen now:
Pen with 4.5% lower MV
Not a lot of difference.
Which is irrelevant since everything is taken as in it’s best quality.
Again, for the 8786787687667767th time, these are all irrelevant for reasons i exlained.
I do. The reason is that you try to use these as “evidence” for russian bias yet you dont cry about germany bias. This is double standards. And also you only mentioned these others AFTER i pointed this out.
Again, which is a bad argument for bias because it would be applicable to every nation in game, thus making the idea of “bias” even stupider than it is now.
The difference is that i dont care how bad or good was something IRL. They should be represented in their best states in the game. No matter if it is german, italian, russian or from a galaxy far far away.
You would bring them up in a different thread that is talking about inaccuracies and not the imaginary russian bias.
I never said that.
Against softer targets. Good luck shooting SAP at enemy battleships at usual battleship ranges. The only time they can do some damage is if they get a lucky hit under the water where the enemy battleship has no/weak armor, at which point even APHE will do a lot of damage especially it it hits ammo.
I was talking about HE not SAP.
Because i followed what you said. Remember “Shells with the most filler”? That’s HE, not SAP or base fuse HE.
You literally compared a 380mm shell to a lower BR, older 14 inch (356mm) APHE and an even older 12 inch (305mm) SAP. Great, you might as well compare a horse to a racing car.
You was not talking about those, you was talking about HE.
BEcause then it is obvious that there is a bear. With the russian bias it’s more like you thinking that this thing on Mars is an artificially built object:
When in reality it’s this:
As i have said before, if there is any kind of bias you can find it in code. You could literally close this debate once and for all and you could proudly be the guy who finally proved that there is russian bias.
but now you just act like an average flerf who is going “my see no curv earf am flett.” (this is not an insult btw)
Dude both Germany and Russia have that issue and its annoying 😑 especially considering they are 100% on the same team when i play
Every nation has it.
Not like Relikt.
WOW an ERA designed to be effective against darts is… effective against darts? OMG!!!
So next time when i aim badly and hit the upper plate of a Tiger II with a Pershing i can just call it germany bias!
Who even mentioned Darts? I spoke about eating air-to-ground missiles.
You quote reply my source quote later on lmao.
Da yis, barrel life is a binary value and only causes issues when it ticks over and only MV is effected.
Yes, I know, as I’ve already said, it should have a effect.
And you aren’t picking up anything I’m putting down are you.
Says that the APHEDS round the maus has no place in game and if it is in game should shatter.
Yeah you aren’t reading anything of what I wrote.
As I already said, such should be the case, I want the naval guns in game to preform realistically, not in a vacuum, and I have reiterated such multiple times now.
Cool and I don’t, case closed, problem solved.
I am frankly amazed at this point.
You seem to think that the shells for all ships, with the most filler in game are exclusively nose fused HE, I regret to inform you that this is not the case.
SAP / BFHE is, for a number of ships, the largest filler shell available to them, I never once referenced nose fused HE you seem to want to tangent to that and thats your own prerogative, I have no interest in following suit.
All targets.
Except that many SAP and BFHE rounds have no issue penning everything but the belt armor of a BB, as already exemplified by the 380 BFHE I showed that has equivalent performance to a purpose built APCBC round.
Aka anything but the belt armor, imagine that.
All rounds will deal good damage if they impact ammo, reminder that functionally all SAP and AP sport nearly the same arming distance within their respective nations, varing per nation, EG the US has a .035 second delay, Germany 0.025, and Italy 0.03 seconds and so on for their BB rounds with a few outliers here and there. So as long as you have SAP or BFHE (Which sometimes does sport a slightly shorter fuse at 0.015 seconds) you can still hit ammo with no issue.
And I’ve never been talking about HE.
And I thought we were talking about battleship where a good majority of BBs sport SAP as either their default round or their largest, by filler volume round. Only the USN sports a majority nose fused HE as their largest and stock HE rounds for a majority of their BBs.
Cool then lets line up the Soyuz vs Bismark then as they fight eachother in game.
Huh, thats weird, Soyuz’s stock SAP is only a few MM worse pen wise at 60 than the purpose built APCBC rounds on Bismarck at your “engagement ranges” of 10 and 15km.
Ok how about Amagi and her 410s?
Nope, only around 15mm of difference or less. (note her number 3 rounds are actually worse lmao)
How about Richelieu
Oh hey, 22mm now thats … totally a massive difference (1936 APCBC is just a tiny bit better)
And the same is the case for Colorado, the 15 inch armed British ships and others, with only Roma, Iowa, Yamato and Soyuz herself having a actual tangible pen improvement over Soyuz’s SAP when compared to their APCBC.
That will be a negative from me hoss.
Nah just the bias ones Germany and Russia
Yeah man seeing my 2022 SPAAs missiles constantly miss apaches and MIs while my team is being bartered by dozens of missiles really makes me feel the bias
Your filthy 105 is not good enough to pen glorious Leopard 2.
japan bais. track ricochet a 457mm pen apfsds
I have not such knowledge about codes to do it but even if i could do it im not sure that i would make you see something that you obviously dont want to see …
Cope KH38MTs are bias as fuck and take 0 skill
Yes, it’s pretty much the reason I play this game.
1 Like
do the usa have a counter to this ? if its not why bother all this bais bullshit
And what exactly does the KH38M(adeup)T have to do with DIRCM being bs?
Do tell me how B3A is more armored and has better survivability than BVM ?
It’s basically nerfed BVM that has semi-useful APS strapped on it.
If people actually know and can hit weakspots of all tanks then the biggest advantage of RU tanks just disappears, poof.
Oh no, neglected minor ones that also get things like Rafale that have special seekers implemented just for their ARHs with AGMs brutally overperforming as well.