yea i know you want the bear foot tracks to be convienced…
So where is the code segment proving the bias? I am waiting!
1 Like
You will wait for very long since i dont have code knowledge as i said before and it will take long time to be educated about … but some things are rather obvious …
For example If i was asked what is this ?
My answer would be a nuclear explosion and i dont have nuclear physics knowledge either…
People will collapse xd. They will have the same meltdown when the Object 292 and 775 were added…
And then they get released and it turns out they are meh at best.
Like okay, you have the Terminator… Good old trash T-72 mobility, likely will be popped by the 30mm ammo explosion since its likely stored where the normal T-72 ammo is, but now you can just shoot at the paper turret and pop it (likely even with a .50 cal).
The Burlak turret is just a sidegrade. You would shoot at the exact same spots as on any other T series tanks.
Then ask somebody. There are likely tons of cult members that know how to code and can find that for you.
Duh. You just made an awful comparism.
One is a well known thing (nukes) and the other is just a delusional cope mechanis with zero proof or valid argument backing it up.
Russian bias is very well known too…there is a social media flooding for years and we are chating in a russian bias topic right now…
Talking about it is not the same as the thing being real. You know, even more people say that the Earth is flat or vaccines cause autism…
1 Like
there you are wrong, it is a phenomena caused by a high yield explosion and dosent inherently have to be a nuclear one
ontop of that the mushroom cloud isnt the explosion but an updraft of alot of hot air carring debries and dust, as the hot air rises it starts to cool down which makes it go down again, just to be sucked back into the updraft, creating the ‘mushroom’
this cloud right here isnt caused by a nuclear explosion, but rather a natural phenomenon:
that is a picture of the Redoubt Volcano errupting in 1990
so yeah your argument just fell short, with you not needing to be a nuclear physics
3 Likes
yeah but there is 3 different variants
i dont know which is based of t90 or t72 but you get the idea.
Kurganets-25 with 30mm or 2s38 57mm with atgms would make a nato main cry
1 Like
I know, but the ammo layout and armor is likely to be essentially the same.
Yeeee an even bigger and slower 2S38… But for sure it would make them cry xd.
I mean just shoot HEAT/HE/HESH to the crew cupola and overpressure xd. Or hit the ammo (tho it would not kill it, but would remove all the ammo)
aps would intercept it
I dont think the hard kill APS could cover the front. But in that case just pop the ammo and that’s it.
That depends. Do we also get equipment from the same timeframe?
Do you understand that the date a vehicle was made is utterly irrelevant?
Duh. What I was referring to is the outcry is very much dependent on if the other trees get similarly modern vehicles which would obviously correlate to its br.
Date usually correlates with BR but not always. Look up a few low tier swedish or south african vehicles…
1 Like
or early jets like the me262
1 Like
Technically the H-39 (you know, the french reserve tier tank) should be around ~8.3 BR because it was in service in israel until the mid 1950s xd. A tank that is horrible even at reserve tier…
if there was fully historical matchmaking then ppl would cry even more about russian bias
because you would have the T-72 with 3BM22 only fighting against stuff that is currently around 8.0 in br
including the 8.0 AMX-30
in that cenerio the T-72 would basically be uncontested
1 Like