Other tanks eat AGMs too, it was posted here before.
You pretty much have 1 viable MBT option at top tier and thats the BVM. All other 12.0 MBT’s are garbage.
You said the quite part outloud “when penned” i love when i shoot a BVM or T90M completely flat angle and the round magical doesnt do any damage lol
1 Like
I love it when i shoot the Leo 2 completely flat angle and the round magical doesnt do any damage lol
Flawless tactic guys! Your confirmation bias got exposed? Let’s false flag!
talking about bais, no one understand that we are going in a wave where gaijin cannot balence the game anymore, the nation are starting to show their weakness, russia in weak in tank mobility/apfsd mm of pen (550mm ru to 630mm to usa) and strong in cas, for the usa its strong in tanks fast firing gun with fire forget atgm but weak in spaa, for cas its mid, strong in heli and weak in planes. its the same for germany/israel/britain/sweeden. but there also the nation that cant even have the same level like italy who is weak in ground and air. we need to accept it and start adding more sub-tree.
what did i say wrong
What you said was actually okay, but the structuring was horrible xd.
Yeah srry just trying my best
Dont worry you are fine, it was just a joke.
what
Yes, i know. Likely the same thing happens when you non pen the side of a T series tank. Calling it bias or using it as evidence for bias is dumb.
1 Like
It depends if i can see a similar explanation that its possible to happen …
This is the other way around. Since an explanation like this exists, it is much more likely to be the correc one in the other cases, and not bias. Unless you can prove that it is bias.
Something you can easily do by finding the code that simulates shots.
If i cant get a similar explanation why my shot or bomb did nothing its just an abnormal incident but when i have many abnormal incidents most of them with a particular nation its up to me to call it as i like (bias, favoritism etc) and no one is forced to embrace my opinion , every body has his own to name it…
Motorola did Sweden, USA, Germany, and Britain.
I just got WZ1001 for China. China has been a far easier grind than Soviets.
While I do agree with most of your takes, and respect all of your takes, I haven’t ever thought of you on my own time.
Partly because Chinese lineups are a lower BR than Soviet lineups until they meet at 12.0.
@MotorolaCRO
You gunning for all ten tech trees?
@I_MiikaL_I
Addressing vehicles is not what handwaving is.
However, waving off SLM, SAMP/T, Sky Sabre, etc is the definition of handwaving.
USA has a larger lineup of more capable vehicles. 6 tech tree vehicles vs Soviet’s 4. 2 of their 4 are mobility limited too.
Overlapped plate was hit:
Hitting left or right would’ve penned.
Even @TROOPER7 is starting to see how people bounce off of the side of T-90s and T-80s by hitting overlapping plates.
Yes it is likely bias. Not russian bias, but confirmation bias.
I mean i can call myself a billionaire but that does not make me one. Wether russian bias exists or not is something we can find out, and it’s not like trying to decide which food tastes the best. That is something that everybody can decide for themselves. The (non)existance of a nation bias is not like that.
Yes i know. The reason for me posting that was not because i did not know why it did not pen, i knew that. The reason was to point out that such things happens to every tech tree and thus it is not bias.
No, I’m talking about reduced general accuracy values as that is the primary cost of having a lower barrel life and higher MV.
Yes, and the gun was tested at that MV and still had issues - “from “Encyclopedia of Russian Artillery.” Russian trials with an initial muzzle velocity of 2,723 fps (830 mps) revealed that the velocity drop after 150 rounds was 4.5% and after 300 rounds 10%. During trials it was also noted that the gun had dispersion problems, which were due to the low quality of the propellant and shells.”
Which was prevalent due to the low quality of the early shells and propellant much akin to the initial makes of the B-37.
And Roma’s guns are also known for having terrible dispersion and barrel life at only 110 to 130 rounds per barrel, - " “The Model 1934 was extremely accurate and was able to deliver very consistent and predictable patterns with devastating hitting power - with the ammunition used for trials. Unfortunately, the materials and supply process in Italy works differently than it does in most other countries. In the U.S., for example, if one wished to test a sample of 16” shells, they might pull an example from stock, and inspect it directly. In Italy, the firm producing the equipment would have the advantage of providing the item for test, thereby possibly delivering an example which would be of atypically good quality with respect to serialized units. This was the problem with the Model 1934 - the firms producing the ammunition did not all produce projectiles of proper quality. [Admiral Angelo] Iachino complained about this in post-war books. Some actions showed a run of good projectiles, where others were plagued by terribly bad examples. Possibly the greatest contrast was seen between the shooting of Littorio in the first battle of Sirte Gulf and that of Vittorio Veneto in the 28 March Guado encounter. Despite the fact that Littorio was shooting at targets 32,000 yards away while Veneto was attacking at first Orion and afterwards Gloucester at only 24,000 yards, the Littorio 's shot groups were significantly more consistent, despite the greater range, doubtlessly owing to a batch of properly fabricated 381-mm projectiles." - Comments by Maurizio Di Sciullo"
Like the B-37 having a high MV and short barrel life coupled with the available quality of the rounds rounds heavily degraded their performance.
I just said I don’t think those rounds should be in game and they should shatter, are you not reading what I’m saying?
No I responded to your comment on said guns to point out the comical state of them.
The B-37 and B-50 guns are indeed the greatest recipients of gaijin’s choice to had wave away compounding issues, if you want to tack on Roma’s 381s we can do that too.
I am talking about such broadly, why else am I bringing up stuff like germany’s 380mm BFHE?
- High capacity, high pen SAP - bad shells
Lmao
And thats why many players use said high end SAP as they reliably deal the most damage.
I don’t know what SAP you are firing but you can deal far more than that per salvo if you aim properly.
You can do the same with the aforementioned SAP, to that same end APCBC nominally works if you are hitting components, SAP does not require such impacts.
Curious that you continue to talk about nose fused HE when I’ve been exclusively talking about BFHE and SAP.
Cool then lets push it out to 15km … oh thats nice the 380 BFHE puts out 138mm of pen at 60 and the Mark 8 APCBC is outputting 130mm and the Patt SAP is putting out 71mm, aka, none are penetrating actual BBs, cruiser wise, bar the kron, all of the above pen without issue bar the citadels on a select few ships, at 10km, the Mark 8 and BFHE happen to be identical, still not penning kron or the heavy CAs and the SAP is doing the same, curious then that only at 7.5km does the APCBC actually pull away, if only slightly.
When Wyoming gets SAP or BFHE, the two rounds I’ve been talking about, sure I’ll take you up on that offer.
You can so easily look this up yourself lol, only the AIM was worse and thats still a vehicle you can buy into.
Lol
And?
Dude is able to maintain 90% WRs with a grand majority of the MBTs in game, even other US MBTs having almost the same perfect WRs. And he says he plays primarily solo, so the only place teams seem to be effecting him would be where the premium vehicles reside.
And I disagree with said statement.
Took long enough for the personal attacks to come out
Was going to respond to this but browser nuked the draft so I’m just going to shug at all of this as I’m not rewriting it.
Like i ve said before , if i see a bear infront of me i will not try to search for bear foot tracks to be convinced, some others maybe would do that everybody is free to think as he likes
everybody can simulate a shot …the critical point is to have an answer why this strange shot result occured