rusia*
@OsirisD
I played these against the new 8.7s.
I also observed what was going on in the matches and noted the players’ skill.
And are worse than NATO counterparts.
Too many people bringing CAS and playing matches ineffectively.
They should worse than their NATO counterparts if Gaijin making everything according the document players sent. “Russian bias” is not defined by in game performance, it is caused by the devs and how they selectively buff Russian vehicle. Sometimes this buff don’t even need a paper to support it, while to other vehicle even you hand out tons of paper to support it, it still “not a bug”
well this update hase a couple of good examples for this thread, in the BUK and its effective range vs NATO AAs
also another major one is the LMUR missile and its lofting flight profile being added in the same update as JAGM which should have a similar flight profile but doesnt loft properly in game, and proves that it is a decision they are making to not fix the hellfire flight profile despite a bug report accepted well over 2 years ago Community Bug Reporting System
T-90M, Abrams, etc lost its “external” ammo protection based on nonsense.
Yet Reddit’s claiming Russian bias instead of the lack of knowledge that it is.
Correct me if im wrong here but the external ammo on the T90 is not always filled, right?
Also gonna add with this most recent update.
What the hell is with them saying that the new modules for ussr vehicles (That effect the turret traverse) won’'t be implemented until more vehicles have them!!!
TF is with this double standard? Like the abrams and leo can suffer with it but not ussr?
(Like i get that Nato vehicles are better generally (In survivability and adaptability), but the fact they pulled the “Rule for thee not for me” is a slap in the face)
I do not know the details at this time.
Also APFSDS explosions don’t over-pressure Abrams crew in-game.
@tensilaspider
Abrams and Leopards don’t have APUs modeled. There’s no double standard.
Its the exact same function as a turret basket (so you can just copy the code), That the ussr has modeled on at least 2 of their tanks as of now. So if they had the same treatment as the Abrams or Leo’s. They should have been added fully this update if only on a select few tanks. The fact that the snail wants to wait for more tanks to have this feature does make it a double standard.
The nato turret basket = to the ussr APU
you would be cring in here as well if the APU would be non functional in game because it would eat rounds through volumetric without doing anything
UNTIL is the keyword there
APU getting destroyed doesn’t mean your turret traverse will be broken ?
It’s funny how Leclercs missed getting their turret baskets.
It controls the horizontal turret traverse in game thought right? At least from what the notes i read said. (Might be miss remembering though)
Still want this, Lazy af snail
The APU doesn’t do turret traverse.
The APU powers things, it’s a 2nd engine.
It’s not the cause of the power traverse system.
USSR’s APU being damaged would not prevent turret rotation, it would just slow it down IF the engine was taken out at the same time, AND battery depleted.
I think on those tanks horizontal turret control lies on the turret ring itself.
From what I can see APU just supplies power when engine is not working.
Double standard for the Frenchies.
Just played a single game of top tier and the game is dead.
Russian Mi-28 spamming LMURS while IR based SAMs cannot kill them
Su-30s launching Kh-38s from even further away well out of range of SAMs
Gaijin fixing HE damage but not for Russian HE shells that destroy a tank by hitting an mg or a commander sight (In what world is that realistic?)
We have anecdotal evidence even in WW2 a HE shell from a 152 or 122 took out Carrius’s cupola on his Tiger tank…Did it then magically transfer through the whole tank? No of course not it damaged the cupola and would have killed the commander had he been in his seat.
It’s too much bias nothing gets to live, no SAMS, no tanks and no aircraft.
Gaijin are killing the game. And Russian mains are enabling by pretending they have nothing good
Say thanks to Gaijin for introducing magic field called LDIRCM.
Kh-38 — missile dynamics have been adjusted, maximum launch range at low altitudes and average speed during flight have reduced, the maximum flight range has been increased to 70 km.
They will actually have a harder time doing their GNSS shenanigans after the update lol.
So Su-30 didn’t face any of the new top SPAA somehow.
Russian mains haven’t been part of this discussion in weeks.
It’s been multi-nation players vs Russian bias claimants.
I haven’t touched Soviet ground in months, as the last time I did was to GNSS enemies with Su-34.
Grom-2 and FAB-3000 for those that are unaware of Su-34’s meta GNSS weapons.
I am going to play Russia again now just to piss you all off.
We had months of utter Russian domination with the Su30/34 spam until the IRIST and Spyder were added.
Before that we had utter Russian domination with Ka50/ ka52 salvoing off Vikhirs at anyone that dared to fire back at them and before that we had ka 52/ mi28s spamming S13 rockets that had 5x their current warhead mass for several months.
The reason why Russian mains arent part of the dicussion is because they know they dont have any ground to stand on, when it comes to disproving the fact that they are by far the most coddled nation in the game. And the people that do seriously try to argue against it get laughed out by other Russian mains let alone anyone who plays any other nation in the game.
Don’t forget to put some clips using LMUR or 38s on helpless 2A7 spammers.