Standing out at it’s own BR is the important part here.
Where are the bias and moan threads about that one ?
All I can see is people trying to get back recently removed fiction from Japan lol.
i have seen some stuff that cant be posted here and it isnt that supportive of extra amraams for the typhoon
Nope, its two distinct conference presentations.
The -MR’s Brochure can be found.
“Compatible with all JAGM user platforms, as well as HF/Longbow platforms with software updates”
1 Like
You shedding rivers of tears because of that brochure while totally ignoring this one doesn’t look great.
If you accept this your crying days about 38MT are over.
1 Like
Because people dont care about fake stuff that only fills a gap and is mid at best. The problem is fake stuff thats unbalanced. If you add fake stuff thats broken then its only broken, because the developer wanted it that way since you cant add something fake in an accurate manner. Thats why people dont complain about the F16AJ and the Yorck but soyuz is hated.
1 Like
Presentation.
That’s actually even worse lol.
and how is that a better source than a brochure?
how do you know they dont lie in those presentations?
1 Like
the F-16AJ was litterally the best F-16 when it was added
1 Like
38MTs fill the gap and those planes are mid at best.
No, problem is all unbalanced stuff.
You can add broken stuff that are perfectly realistic.
Doesn’t change the fact it’s too strong.
1 Like
Why would they lie at an Industry event they have been invited to speak at? Especially representing your own corporation’s activities; Lying to your (prospective) customers isn’t a very good way of converting interest to sales.
Not at all - you either accept the same level or bar of entry for additions or you don’t.
The Kh-38 is almost a perfect example of one rule for one, one rule for others.
If don’t see the problem with that, then that’s your call. It seems clear that so long as your personal pet favourites get additions then you are fine with it, but everyone else can get knotted.
1 Like
funny, becasue have you seen us openly cry about the JAGAM?
have you seen us make US-bais cope threads?
1 Like
Yes, but Russian Arms manufacturers NEVER lie or provide over-estimations of their products capabilities. Only Western ones!
You should tell yourself that.
You mean like JAGMs ?
you are displaying double standarts
how do you know US maufactures dont lie?
2 Likes
You’ve made the accusation - you back it up.
Filling the gap is not the same as punching the powerlevel completely out of the roof.
True thats why broken stuff need to be nerfed or get peers to fight against. But you completely ignored the most important part of my comment. If a fake thing is broken its completely on the imperative of the developer since they can design fake stuff in a balanced way, because there are no (or not many) real values to go by. Thats why people rightfully scream bias when they see Soyuz, Gaijin had every possibility to release that thing in a balanced state but decided not to
Proving a negative is impossible, remember that argument ?
1 Like