Russian Bias in 2025?

2A7 at 11.0 wouldn’t just be undertiered, it would be broken but still would pass your logic check.

It’s all performance based in this game, so if your vehicle fits into the BR you’re fine. I doubt those three 38MT carriers are anything special at their BR.

1 Like

do they say it can carry 16 JAGAM-MRs?
you didnt provide any proof yet

i smell blatant double standarts

1 Like

Like i said thats the problem Gaijin has with being incosistent regarding rail compatibility vs Weapon compatibility
Its actually contrary to a double standard. As long as the SU30 gets to fly around with all its current R77s and KH38s its more than fair that the Apache gets 16 JAGAMs based on rail compatibility. Suffering from a double standard i that regard is the Eurofighter with its 6 Fox3s

1 Like

where are the pictures of 16 JAGAMs?

you are dodging the question

1 Like

They arent but the MT is absolutely a standout in that BR. And the biased part about the MT is not that its strong its that its implementation does not meet Gaijin usual standards regarding sources.

1 Like

I literally just answered your question. Gaijin adds 16 based on rail compatibility

1 Like

so now let me ask you why the inner pylons on the Mi-28 wouldnt be compatible?

1 Like

Does anything else use those rails?

Vhikers were mounted on them before
and they usally mount the DL pod for the MITL for the LMUR there as well
and then stuff like Iglas

No fucking idea? Im not the guy questioning that but for the JAGM there is an actual consistent and proven way that you can follow to arrive at 16. No idea if that exists for the MI 28 as well
Its literally just: can it carry Hellfires? → yes → it can carry JAGM

Show us proof of the wiring diagrams that show they can be fired from the other pylons.

It is a fuel tank, it would not be put on the outside pylon simply by virtue of not carrying a bloody big can of avgas and having it right on the outermost point any round, shell or drone can fly into it.

Use some critical thinking man.

1 Like

I’m talking specifically about the mounting rail, not the inner-wing station in question.

There’s many standouts at different BRs regarding some of their tech.

Just like 16AJ’s.

so you are asking for classified documents

great man

1 Like

Just using the SAME request that Gaijin used for saying the Typhoon couldn’t possibly carry extra AMRAAMs. See the issue?

But they are usually real

True 16AJ should go

That’s a brochure.

1 Like

there are two launchers one carring a single LMUR and the other one carrying 2 of them
due to the design of the launcher i would say that it is highly unlikly that anything else (that isnt specifically desgned for it) can use it

image
image

Then it should be fine (looks at everyone’s favourite KH AGM) then. Unless you want a different set of standards for a non-Russian addition?