Except in the past Russia top tier wasn’t strong because of lazy modeling.
They were strong because of additions being strong or having a bigger lineup.
This is my issue, they may be able to but we have no evidence to support it.
We have no images and no brochures/reports confirming it.
I worry like R-77 dual pylons Gaijin is justifying it for balance. Typhoon was not allowed 2 more 120s due to no proof the wiring was in place…
Just want some clarification
1 Like
No! Say it isn’t so!
Are you telling me that our snail overlords are potentially going to display double-standards and give a certain tech tree new toys on the most flimsy pretence? Again…
1 Like
for Su-27sm it was understandable, the Su-30 shouldn’t have got them tbh.
2 Likes
they dont want to add the su35 but give its weapons to su27sm/30sm.
1 Like
hypocritical as ever
show me some images of the AH-64E carrying the JAGAM-MR or even 16 of them
it isnt a drop tank it is a DL pod for MITL, if they really wanted to use it as a counter weight they would put it on the outer pylon
also the Mi-28 is pretty much always seen with the double pylon for the LMUR
lmur on the right side of the heli (in flight direction)
lmur on the left side of the heli (in flight direction)
so yeah it is possible that the Mi-28 can only carry 4, but it is also possible that it can carry them on all pylons just like it is possible that the Ah-64E can only carry 1 JAGAM-MR, the one that was apperently test fired (i assume it was fired from an Apache)
but sure lets remove the LMUR from the inner pylon and lets add Vhikers there
while searching for images i found this:
and i dont want to be the only one that has to see it
7 Likes
The netherlands, The uk and Poland have JAGAMs on order for their Apache fleets. Would be kinda weird it they purchased missiles their helis cant fire.
If you’re biased it’s your end goal to make nation you like really strong, doesn’t matter if the reason is stupid or not.
No one was forcing you to add that thing without it’s peers, but you did it anyways. Pretty convenient.
According to your logic, adding 2A7 at 11.0 wouldn’t be bias just because the vehicle itself is realistic. This is funny and sad at the same time.
Now post evidence it can carry 16 like it can in the game.
I asked for pictures of the JAGM-MR on an Apache
I didn’t ask if someone ordered it
1 Like
Don’t worry, I’m sure it’s just a “funni mishap” to give it 16 missiles without even checking it can carry all that beforehand.
If stuff of one Tech tree was consistently undertiered compared to others then yes that would be bias. One example like the Turm III rn is not bias since every tech tree boasts under BRed vehicles at certain points so its not like one gets favoured in that regard.
I mean technically not really its backwards compatible to the same M299 Launcher the Hellfires use so thats where Gaijin gets the 16 from. And the general compatibility comes from offical documents from the UK, Netherland and Poland that order the JAGM for their respective AH-64E which would be a weird move if it couldnt carry them
But youre right its the same can of worms that weapon systems compatibility vs rail compatibility is the entire time
JAGM is the same size as Hellfire it is designed to be carried in the same launchers
show me pictures of the AH-64E being able to carry 16 JAGAM-MRs
where are the pictures?
or do you guys have different standarts for western additions than for eastern ones regarding proof?
No? Export documents count as a source
2A7 at 11.0 wouldn’t just be undertiered, it would be broken but still would pass your logic check.
It’s all performance based in this game, so if your vehicle fits into the BR you’re fine. I doubt those three 38MT carriers are anything special at their BR.
do they say it can carry 16 JAGAM-MRs?
you didnt provide any proof yet
i smell blatant double standarts
Like i said thats the problem Gaijin has with being incosistent regarding rail compatibility vs Weapon compatibility
Its actually contrary to a double standard. As long as the SU30 gets to fly around with all its current R77s and KH38s its more than fair that the Apache gets 16 JAGAMs based on rail compatibility. Suffering from a double standard i that regard is the Eurofighter with its 6 Fox3s