Will you be happy if I promise you that I will officially complain once it hits live?
Highly depends on the situation, as getting close to the battlefield is always dangerous.
But you know the answer already? You clearly aren’t looking for a list.
I could just as easily ask how many Maverick Variants have an Active Radar Seeker, and a 70Km+ range then turn around and complain that it’s (The AGM-65 Longhorn, by the way. It’s just as real as the -38MT is, I’m “sure”) not implemented.
where are the US bais threads?
where are the complaints that it was only mentioned in news articles, not even in brochures?
where are the complaints that the AH-64E will be able to carry 16 of them while the Z-10ME will only be able to only carry 12 FnF AGMs?
hypocricy at its peak
@H_ngma
When my posts contain errors I edit the errors out. I’m doing better to tell you and others when I do and why, and I appreciate you noticing.
Sure, there are planes without AGM-65s, Hammers, and Kh-38MTs; and soon Hammers and Kh-38MTs won’t be those missiles either because they’re currently over-performing with a copy-paste AGM-65D seekers in-game.
IR AGMs are not meta anymore due to CLAWS and SLM, and soon to be others I forget the names of [you should know how easily I forget names from my post’s mistyping of a ship class].
Kh-38s on Su-30 someone posted on the other topic, and I’ve been lazy to find them again cause it’s a non-issue to me at this stage.
you clearly dont
you claimed that Kh-19T carriers could just use thermals to help with finding targets
so please tell me what planes that have the Kh-19T also have thermals through their optics
(small hint there are two and both are rank 8)
It’s hilarious. Motorola and tripod argue about pre-top/top tier cas and how to use it for better results.
Second one don't play pre-top/top tier at all.
I mean just by a quick glimpse at the Wikipedia article the thing seems to have orders of magnitude more sources and reports than the KH38MT
And im sure once it hits live and is even somewhat oppressive you’ll get your us bias threads
10€ that they won’t change the seekers ever. If they wanted to it would have happened already.
Partially agree however having an IR guided missile with GNSS combines the best of both worlds so kh38 and hammer won’t leave the meta any time soon
GNSS don’t work on IR missiles
LOAL has to be in the game for them to change the seekers, and specifically programmable LOAL.
LOAL is currently not in the game.
IR weapons also require direct line of sight to launch in War Thunder making GNSS’s primary use case pointless.
-Oh yeah totally forgot that you have to choose the guidance mode of the Kh and the hammer in the hangar before the game…???-
SORRY MB MIXED UP MT AND ML
Can they be launched in GNSS mode without a point/track lock?
In IRL, the X-38ML is better than the X-38MT
great joke there wont
so where were the US bias threads when the F-15C went rampant in air for almost 6 months
so where are all the france bias threats for the Rafale being the single best top tier in the game for 9 months now
so why is there an unequal ammount of complaints comparing the Z-10ME and Mi-28MN they both have DIRCM but one gets complained about alot more than the other
there wont be any big complaints unless it is russia bacause that is the nation the community uses as a boogyman so they dont have to accept that they are bad at the game
are you sure?
if you think this is more information than in the brochure then iam not sure
because in the brochure the is the following information:
- range
- average speed
- max launch speed
- max launch altitude
- probability of a target hit
- missile weight
- information about servicing the missile in storage
- shelf life
while for the JAGAM MR wikipedia only says it has increased range and a tri mode seeker
no they cant
only laser guided weapons with GPS/GNSS can make use of it
?
It’s just don’t work with IR missiles. You can’t launch them via gnss because they need lock. And gnss dont work after launch so kh38 or hammer will act absolutely the same vs smoke as agm65 for example.
1 Like
Yep mb fixed my comment
I can’t say anything about the F15 but there are multiple threads about how broken the Rafale is and again neither the Rafales nor the F15s existence is in question. The rest is simply that Russia is a lot more played than china so obviously Russian stuff will be more on peoples minds.
Yeah it actually has multiple reports about actual tests (granted not on an Apache) which the MT is lacking completely
so where are the french bias claims?
russian bias was a thing in the community long before the Kh-38 was even added to the game
it has nothing to do with it
so where are the specifics i listed but for the JAGAM-MR?
all of that information is avaiable for the Kh-38
1 Like