So someone criticizing your posts has you stop engaging?
Bless your heart.
There’s an outside world out there where people will be far less kind if your documentation has errors.
Ignored?
they scream enough to make Thai VT-4 disappear from Thai TT i don’t call that ignore
sht funny that their TT has US RU Japan and French vehicles but hey they’re fine with them.
And they receive awful tanks, CAS and AA in return.
That’s a great deal for CN, don’t you think ?
Yet their MBTs are still weak, their top tier CAS is non existent, their AA is just meh. Also support lineup, what is that even?
Like I said earlier. Seeing what they got done regarding th Thai VT-4, it suprises me that they never banded together before to get their vehicles buffed.
or they can get game ban in China because some silly reasons? not because they banded together.
No i just wont waste my time with a wall of text when the second paragraph already has a take this delusional
Also comparing war thunder forum contributions to real life is hilarious
@_Renzo
China has among the best MBTs and light tanks.
They have competitive SPAA.
China’s one of the best tech trees to play, especially when a some of their tanks are under-BR’d currently compared to the other tech trees.
CAS being non-existent is a net positive in my eyes. Means Chinese players will focus more on winning than getting frags in an aircraft.
I love my strong supporting lineups in China.
@AlvisWisla “Soyuz is not made up, your post comes off as indirect hate of Britain because they can get HMS Vanguard, an even stronger ship that was only laid down.”
You mean this HMS Vanguard? Yeah, only laid down… then sort of launched, fitted out, armed and put into service for a decade or so.
Like I say, he’s worth it for the laughs.
@Crazed_Otter
How is criticizing Russian equipment bad takes?
How is decompression a bad take?
Zero people on this forum have posted the takes of mine that are allegedly bad, zero.
People make claims without evidence.
Its different because there are numerous production representative hulls.
Not quite, the variants with a Digital Architecture (-65D and later) won’t have complete functionality without the use of the revised “-A/A” station adapters, and the SAP warhead variants shouldn’t be loaded on the Triple rails as they are not rated to aircraft limits or 9G’s whichever is lower.
So then what did Gaijin base their addition off? As evident above they have fairly draconian negative standards for proof of capability (reminder, as shown above I had a report denied and have to prove that the AH-64E can in fact use the ATAS, when it’s already implemented in game).
That’s kind the point, they could point to an archive or document, that doesn’t actually exist , or refuses to play ball; but haven’t.
It’s really not that hard Optical character recognition has come a long way, and there are many other methods to boost productivity worth investing in if you are doing repetitive tasks at a large scale.
Read the post above yours… about those bad takes?
@Crazed_Otter
My post had the incorrect ship in it, and was fixed:
So either prove that Lion class was produced or we’re in agreement.
I’m glad we’re in agreement that HMS Vanguard saw service though.
I don’t think you have the slightest idea what you’re on about… are you using ChatGPT again?
Kh-29TD is a 6km class TV guided missile, it’s a 10.0 BR missile at best.
Both were in production.
@Crazed_Otter
Why do you use AI?
Have original thought like the rest of us.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
You are thinking of the -29TE not the -TD.
Community flagged hah? touch the nerve, didn’t I?
ofc that what you guys to best.
1 Like
Yep - he does that a lot.
1 Like
It’s pathetic when they can’t come up with points or agreement, and flag posts without personal attacks.
It’s TV guided:
