your video isnt working
so i see nothing hitting anything
My bad, fixed
man does it really have to be Matawg
are there really no other videos about the buk
1 Like
Yea, just grabbed the first one in the search. I mean gameplay is gameplay anyway, you can mute the sound. (it’s either him or EC)
Looks like you’re one of those that underestimate the amount of time and research it takes to find valid info on hundreds or thousands of vehicles from 10 nations. WT forum being a single place that contains all of it is a perfect place to start for any competition.
They would only need to point in the direction of where it came from, with a name of a document and (preferably) the archive it came from. No need for dumping the entire contents of the report online. of which others could follow up on.
If that were actually a concern;
why are they ok with leaving the remotest possibility of actual datamined information tacitly approved for publication?
Or directly reference reports and documents in changelogs?
If it’s actually “supa sekrit” stuff would it be wise to use it in the first place?
They really don’t make it that hard to find what they base things off for the most part just a hand full of edge cases here and there where questionable implementation occurs.
What? Pre-write a bunch of articles, It’s not as if they don’t have access to at least the fairly immediate shorter range planning documents. That doesn’t take all of their time.
2 Likes
Dude acts like war thunder sources are the Coca Cola formula
No competitor will rise up just because they are transparent about their sources
I’m okay with you mentioning it once. But you did it twice in a span of 10 minutes. Stop using this vile hoop jumping language. It’s not thousands of vehicles from 10 nations all at once. It’s them in a batches of 4-5?ish at once - maximum. What are you talking about.
Damn being human is so hard, you have to drink 2700 liters of water…
In a year mate, in a year that is…
Well it could be worse a lot worse
atleast TEC puts timestamps in his videos
so it somewhat equals out
And searching that up is hard when you give all of the details ?
One report doesn’t necessarily hold all the info about the vehicle, it might rather be a specific report for something else, like a round’s velocity or something like that.
They don’t give out documents on their dev blogs either, so what about that ?
“Supa sekrit” indeed ?
That’s only what you can see on the outside.
Internally, we have no idea what’s going on.
Well he wasted a lot of missiles trying to shoot down one Su-30SM which is not the best one at dodging.
It would make their job much, much easier and save them who knows how much money.
You never know what would happen.
idk the video shows that they are easy to defeat
What are you talking about my dude.
Mat brought some one in Su-30 to try dodge the missile which i think bring big score for him.
It can be when it’s not freely available or buried in a private archive.
Every bit helps build a Mosaic of a vehicles capabilities and the documents often hold more than just that one relevant element.
Reframing well researched Wikipedia articles and omitting anything that isn’t being implemented must be so so hard.
You say that like they have never publicly posted Recruitment notices, oh wait;
We have a pretty good idea of what is expected of them in their day to day.
That isn’t filling a gap?
Show us one example, a singular example of a 20km range class IR AGM that Soviets have in-game that is not Kh-38MT.
It’s obviously filling a gap.
M10 Booker was cancelled after production started, it’s the same exact situation of laid down ships.
Soyuz is not made up, your post comes off as indirect hate of Britain because they can get Lion-class battleships, an even stronger ship that was only laid down.
You can in this case, project cancellations have paper evidence.
There are quite literally photographs of Kh-38 missiles being equipped to Su-30s and Su-34s; version does not necessarily matter as it’s a universal missile similar to later AGM-65s.
As for there being no test documents; business secrets that people can only get access to by signing NDAs and other means.
Ad populum fallacy.
Popularity never aligned with capability of a tech tree.
Your posts are defending the Soviet tech tree in the weirdest way…
Specifically it’s an MTE as stated on the same page. ML uses a different control surface pattern and doesn’t use an angled down seeker set.
Cool, your post indirectly states Russian bias doesn’t exist by using such a standard.
Kh-38MT when first implemented was an AGM-65D/G with a bigger warhead, it came in on Su-25SM3.
Sure, Kh-38s got corrected [buffed] many times since then, which made them better. People also learned techniques to use Kh-38s and Hammers differently to AGM-65s which made them slightly more effective.
I stopped reading there
Congratulations or I’m sorry that that happened to you
What makes you believe you’re going to have access to that private archive.
It helps, but creating a book out of individual pages is much harder than just getting a copy of the book as a whole.
There must be some documents they extracted the vehicle’s data from, so listing it outright wouldn’t be much of an issue if they’re so keen to share every bit of information they have.
It gets even worse with vehicles that also have new, never-seen-before mechanics/weapons attached to them, as public would like to see documents about their stated performances as well.
They’re withholding large chunks of information for someone that is supposedly perfectly fine with sharing.
So do list what should CMs do…