Russian Bias in 2025?

making copy paste premiums to make more money

Which will change soon of course. I think BUK and SAMP will be shared best AA.

Building rapport and by doing so exposing a bunch of data that took time and effort to find. That would be a perfect pool of information for any competing company to get everything done for them basically.

Haven’t you seen what CMs do in the section of the forum dedicated to news ?

the BUK is a joke of a SAM

Give me tests, at least some. Or at the very least even fake procurement or exploitation documents on it. Training data? Maybe real usecases? Maybe some tests/evaluations?

If a liar tells me something - the first thing I do is doubt. The second he’s failing to show any compelling evidence he’s not beating a liar allegations. However much mental gymnastics you’re willing to exert it’s not taking you anywhere for around a year at this point.

The “It’S rEaL” guys like yourself prior to apearance of this image (mind you’ it’s the only one on the internet) were jumping through the hoops so unfathomably tight - a hydrogen atom wouldn’t go through them, now you have your sacred set of pixels that change exactly nothing, but hoops are still being jumped through.

A simple 2 AMRAAMS are being refused for Typhoon only because they “aren’t sure about pylon’s electronic compatibility”. UHT has 4 less PARS-LR missiles even though literal images and documents about additional launchers exist. And have you noticed? They’re being refused even though none of those changes would be gamebraking whatsoever. What about 38mt? How balanced is it? So balanced that it just had to be added to the game despite there being perfectly suitable substitutes that are in the game now? Mmw capability of Brimmstone is historical, why it was taken away? Why instead of limiting them they killed it’s only feature at it’s core with no substitution provided? I’m not educated enough about same cases for other nations, but there are some - that’s for sure. Double standarts on documentation procurement/impelentation requirements/balance weight points - that’s what is so annoying about this situation. No one, I’ll repeat, literally nobody would mention 38mt even once - would it be a reasonable addition for the game.

It’s one of the 2 AAs that can survive with only the launchers. That is a pretty big advantage.

Also besides the SLM the BUK is already better than all of the “new” AA systems added last update.

that adavatege is absolutly useless if your missiles cant hit anything

ontop of that the radars on the launchers didnt had IFF on the dev server from what i heard

Gaijin rely on publicly available information anyhow - it isn’t particularly super-secret stuff that another company couldn’t find out themselves.

The issue is basically that Gaijin will accept some sources with little secondary authentication (the Kh-38 brochure) but demand far more information for other reports/suggestions. In fact, the bar to get a non-Russian vehicle or weapon added seems to be far higher (it’s possible, but good luck getting past Mr Not A Bug) - as evidenced by @tripod2008 above.

1 Like

Still better than not having it and still having missiles that can’t hit anything.

so the BUK will be the best SAM becasue it has multiple radars and missiles that cant hit anything

and the IRIS-T is bad becasue it has a single radar and missiles that can hit

that is what iam getting from you

so please enlighten me how the BUK is supposed to pose any threat with missiles that arent hitting

Forgetting that there are nations besides Germany and Russia, typical.

Oh, they’ll make sure they’re hitting before a patch drop, that’s for sure.

the same applies to the SAMP/T and the CAMM

both only have a single radar and missiles that will hit

but yeah lets just distract from the actual claim which was:

so how will the BUK be the best AA (with the SAMP/T) if it poses less of a threat than the IRIS-T, CAMM-ER and SAMP/T

Scraping all of that from the internet/books takes time. We’re talking about hundreds of vehicles here.

Competing company could just make a burner account and go: Gaijin do gib all data, you’re building rapport, remember that.

The bar is so high that they added literal fiction to non-RU nations.

Nations like Israel, Japan, Sweden and China wish they had a SAM even half as good as the BUK lol.

Poor Russia getting a top 4 (5) AA, they suffer so much.

whataboutism

so you admit that you made a false claim while also putting words into my mouth

China is being ignored so much.
Shit tanks, CAS and AAs so I don’t know why they haven’t received something really good already.

1 Like

Seeing the influence that the Chinese playerbase has on Gaijin (Thai VT-4), it absolutely baffles me that they never banded together to get their tanks buffed/fixed.

1 Like

Gaijin not releasing publicly availabe info, because some non-existing competitor could steal it is truly one of the takes of all time

I dunno, seems like it’s hitting to me…