Or not at all well never know since they didnt finish it and nothing like it.
Bayern (and Derfflinger) are the closest existing Designs thats what you can base Yorcks model on
So you saying that the were unable to build them is false, since we cant know it for sure.
Stop shifting goalposts.
Well of course not, players are going to have their areas of interest and aren’t going to discuss a similar issue found in every other area where they aren’t as interested. It’s going to be true the other way around as well, those that are interested in and are complaining about L23 likely aren’t going to be complaining about KH-38MT. That’s just a normal thing that happens. Bring it up also doesn’t help as it’s more of an “whataboutism” thing.
So is you saying that they could.
Im not. Bayern and Derfflinger existed so you can reasonably work out Yorcks theoretical performance in most regards. You cannot do the same with Soyuz since there is nothing real thats close to it
That picture is from Zhuhai brochure under 38MTE.
No. These are just all about double standards. They cry russian bias for even the slightest inaccuracies (even if those arent even inaccuracies) yet they are completely silent about any other nation’s actually incorrect/fake stuff.
It is not. It is exposing their double standards.
Funny.
I don’t see the connection, it is a whataboutism argument. “They are complaining about x thing, but what about y thing?”
Acting like this thread has an actual topic lol
1 Like
Exactly, so it can get closed.
Potentially yes. Would have they been good or useful? Not really, all they would do is be target practice for the Luftwaffe, but potentially they could have been finished, or at least i do not see any argument why they could not.
Do i say they would have been 100% finished? No. However saying the could not have been finished is also silly.
Yes you are absolutely doing it.
Your original argument:
Now your argument is that the Bayern is the closest to them that was built. You literally changed your goalpost instead of admitting that you just mixed up 2 ships.
Because if you cry about one, you should do the same about all the rest.
am i blind or is that mt
look at the seeker and wing
It has the same warranty as saying that it could have been finished.
The ingame model and performance is based on Bayern not on mackensen. You brought real life basis into the argument
Also none of that changes my initial argument that Yorck has historical reference while Soyuz doesnt
Trying to prove the picture with the possibly faulty ingame model is peak brain
Looks like MT more than anything else.
The image has been so utterly “debunked” that this was the end result.
2 Likes
No. Saying it could have been finished also suggest that it is not guaranteed, therefore it is more inclusive than saying it could not have been finished.
Source?
Because that is more rational…
Do you actually think that people will take evidence when they still say the Yak APHE is fake despite there being evidence provided that it did exist?
Oh also, where is the evidence for the QF RAM having a 800HP engine?
That’s the point, it’s not.
But only one side gets the hate for being bad.
So all I can see is Japanese bias, right ?
1 Like
That is not how that works. It isn’t how that works in life in general actually. You constantly see people protesting specific issues for specific places when what they are protesting against is happening in more than one place. I’m not going to entertain that argument any further, it’s going to lead nowhere.