No. Saying it could have been finished also suggest that it is not guaranteed, therefore it is more inclusive than saying it could not have been finished.
Source?
Because that is more rational…
Do you actually think that people will take evidence when they still say the Yak APHE is fake despite there being evidence provided that it did exist?
Oh also, where is the evidence for the QF RAM having a 800HP engine?
That’s the point, it’s not.
But only one side gets the hate for being bad.
So all I can see is Japanese bias, right ?
That is not how that works. It isn’t how that works in life in general actually. You constantly see people protesting specific issues for specific places when what they are protesting against is happening in more than one place. I’m not going to entertain that argument any further, it’s going to lead nowhere.
And those are as well double standards.
My mistake, armor and machinery is from Derfflinger and armament is Bayern.
Not when you’re talking about a game where mackensen doesn’t exist (yet)
That’s just not true
If the F16 AJ was a significant improvement compared to all other Jets in that br then absolutely yes but it’s not
If you disagree with your own defenition of whataboutism then nobody can help you
Because in real life they were based on the Mackensens. It’s like saying that a KV-122 is based on a KV-1 L-11 when the KV-85 is not yet added…
That’s not a source.
You don’t understand all that advertisement is just to double-cross the customers it’s all pre sale fraud !
Not exactly the argument is Russia has this overpowered vehicle/weapon so it’s proves existance of bias bringing out other overpowered thing in other tech tree meant to show dishonesty of argument it doesn’t meant to change the context.
I haven’t seen many articles speaking about how France is destroying several African countries for years now, but mainstream media is filled with anti-RU propaganda. Imagine that.
It’s a significant improvement for things Japan have at that BR, which is nothing.
All kills made by that vehicle are unfair ones as they shouldn’t happen in the first place as vehicle in question is a complete fabrication.
Ffs yes but Bayern and derfflinger existed so gaijin can reasonably model Yorck based on the real life capabilities and the already existing in game performance, because it’s not a quantum leap over everything else. Soyuz doesn’t have any of those things.
You just literally don’t understand what whataboutism is
There is a discussion about the kh38
And you come in here with
“But what about tvc for the ef”
Clearly not whataboutism
Might call it a diversion as well, because you clearly diverted the discussion so that you don’t have to show any proof for your claims
The most advanced technologies were used to build the Project 23 ship: spies, purchase of foreign ships, the Russian Imperial fleet, Stalin’s order, Mariupol metallurgy (of course, building 15 battleships by 1945 is too ambitious a project, but building 2 is quite possible)
Yeah imagine that current news is filled with news about a current war, shocker that one.
Its a filler, not a broken top of the line addition. So bad implementation but no bias
Same game, same issue, just a different example that gets treated differently for some reason. Not whatabouttism.
This is far from the only war in the world and you know it.
Japan got something they shouldn’t.
Looks pretty bias to me.
in the context of soviet shipbuilding in the 30s and 40s lol
nope one of the systems is in the game the other one isnt
no it isnt one is a weapon system the other one is a jet engine
it gets treated differently becasue it is different
yes whatabouttism
But its the biggest of this century
Would be if its addition was to skew japanes performance to a point where it shouldnt be