But its the biggest of this century
Would be if its addition was to skew japanes performance to a point where it shouldnt be
Are you deliberately misunderstanding the entire thing or are you just genuinely stupid?
Omission is neither denial nor acceptance. Double standards means applying opposing solutions to the same issue in different places (or occasions) on purpose. Not talking about the second circumstance isn’t automatically taking a stance on it in either direction. They have to actively apply opposing views for it to be double standards and/or hypocrisy.
1 Like
That’s pretty debatable as US was at war with AFG for 20 years in this century.
So let’s quickly fix all gaping holes in the game with complete and utter fiction.
I don’t see why does Japan have to receive preferential treatment, must be bias.
thats what you are doing
you started with “but what about TVC for the EF”
it is a clear cut
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “but what about X?”) is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
thank you for showing your true colors and unwillingness of having a good faith argument
Of course it would be difficult to reach the level of the USA or Great Britain, but it is quite possible to reach the level of Germany and France
Ive been trying to have one the entire time but you dont make the slightest amount of effort to understand and instead cry whataboutism like you understand what that mean.
They are both potential additions for the game, one has an existing prototype, both are advertised in brochures, none have reports of ever being actually tested. Its one example, there are more that are similar. I cant find evidence that the MT was never tested, because you cant prove a negative so i found an example with similar parameters to show how ridiculous that discussion is
Comparing AFG with the current war is truly something…
Thats the point, the AJ isnt, its based on an existing platform without sigificant changes
Might I recommend not getting him started on semantics - the thread has been derailed by his English Comprehension skills already.
For further details I defer to my learned forumite @An_Pigeon - with whom I probably disagree on the issues of Bias. Wonky English use however - we’re on the same page.
you havent you have been defelcting the whole time with you bringing up TVC for the EF and stuff like “you cant proof nonexistence” as a counter for the picture of the kh38mt being mounted to a jet
you were intentonaly distacting from the point at hand so that people will stop asking you for something that proofs your claim
you said yourself what at means and it is exactly what you are doing here
you mean a gif of an engine being mounted in a test stand
so let me ask you a question what was is the original assumption of the kh38mt not being real based on
the TVC for the EF was a venture by a company that struggled to secure funding for the project
Osterhuber says that some pilots have described their experiences in the simulator as “eye watering”, adding: “We are nearly at the end of a feasibility study. We are now ready to take our concepts and show potential performance improvements.”
Funding to support a flight-test effort would need to come from one or more of the core nations or export customers, and/or industry.
meanwhile the Kh-38 is a modular missile system in which the seekers can be switched for one another and suprise suprise there is performance data for the seeker of the Kh-38MT
1 Like
guys
There is not a single bit of proof that a functioning KH38MT was ever mounted or tested on an actual plane. No test report, no production numbers, nothing. Just Brochures and a low res picture.
Yes the “evidence” for the EF TVC is terrible but its equally terrible and both dont fulfill the standards Gaijin has for the game.
GUYS!?!?!
I don’t think any of the above crosses 2.11.
We’re not using the forum for political purposes - just having a back and forth over military history. Y’know, the entire premise the game is marketing itself on…
That one guy absolutely was tho
any talks about what is happening currently, geopolitically falls under that rule afaik
no matter what context
More like 3.1.6 perhaps, still, not something that should be on the forum either way in my opinion.
I would also avoid publicly discussing moderation, best to just flag and let the Forum Moderators handle it.
1 Like
Fine then - fair enough - I’ll keep my counsel and leave it there.
I mean technical moderator said there’s enough proof behind 38MT, so any more discussions about that particular issue won’t lead anywhere.
1 Like
the original assumption, why it dosent exist, was because it wasnt in any new brochures after ~2014
but well it is in a brochure from 2024