You keep using the word literally to emphasise what you mean, when it is you who quite clearly doesn’t understand how your statement argues against itself.
It is quite relevant as I am stating your level of English isn’t as high as you think it is.
Over using the word literally is a sign of this.
Definition of literally as per cambridge dictionary.
- adverb
- using the real or original meaning of a word or phrase.
Or the infromal use (which tends to be over used and incorrectly used)
That is completely irrelevant to what you stated.
You stated his sources didn’t justify his claim.
When they clearly did.
The logical connection is there quite clearly.
Your outright refusal of them doesn’t mean they aren’t there.
Kamov was blatantly OP when added and it has taken years to toe it in line.
His conclusion is it is russian, therw for russian bias.
Oppose to say, premium bias, which is far more likely.
You can’t even spell finaly yet are trying to infrom me the one who has had to cite sources to gain my diploma how to cite them.
You as the debater have to cite your own sources to refute the oppositions.
That is how this works.
Not just saying Nuh hu.
He quite clearly has stated multiple times how they are connected.
I don’t ageee with him at all mind you.
However your flat out denial of information that has been presented numerous times in front of you is glaringly obvious.
You are in fact choosing to ignore the provided evidence, links and conclusion as it goes against what you believe.
As I stated I’m aware it is not bias for Russia, however his conclusion points him towards bias as I have stated.
You haven’t provided a source to diswade him or activity counter what he says at all.
Again over using literally. It doesn’t make you sound smarter to use it 4 or 5 times in the space of 2 replies.
They are cherry picked, however find me any study, or claims that do not use cherry picked sources.
Edit, now this has gone on long enough, you clearly have less of an understanding of the language you use than you would like to think.
Go back to debating or not if you think Gaijins incompetence or bias is at fault.