Then maybe form an argument tha actually proves it.
Because people dont buy them anymore…
Then it is not bias, it is just easier for them to add those, thus they do it. Would you rather do:
spend somebody to archives trying to find details about a one off prototype with the possibility to not find enough info (thus "wasting time and money), OR
add another Object XYZ they can find in Kubinka or another Sherman or any vehicle they can copy-paste to several trees.
Just like germany or USA, as well as the bit bigger size of the USSR tree can easily be explained by what i above mentioned.
Just like others?!
Then you should be able to prove it with either concrete evidence or a logical argument that rules out other explanations.
So far you havent done any of those.
???
Do you relize that you can pretty much put any 2 similar vehicles against each other and in most cases one will be better?
Nono, it can only be bias with russia…
Which is actually funny since being biased towards russia would be harmful for them, since it is the western audiences that can pay, not the russians… To whom would appeal the russian bias? Certainly not to the westerns.
A few members of the mods is not the same as the company. IIRC mods arent even employees, and certainly are not paid.
This is like arguing that WG was against their playerbase when a single employee that was fired but still had access hid a really high polygon object on a map that caused even the strongest PCs to run with single digit FPS…
Do you now say that you know that there is no bias, but it just seems like it and you just deluded yourself?
Also funny that even most CASvocates here have stopped with the AA “argument” because even they realized that it is stupid.
To be fair it can as well as other ERAs when it gets volumetric’d.
You’ve been shown repeatedly to be incapable of accepting any argument that doesn’t align with your rather odd worldview.
You could certainly do with learning basic comprehension of how sources work. Feel free to flag this post like all the others.
PS- If you choose to follow up on your fellow forumite’s gracious offer of English lessons, I’m sure the forum will be happy to do a whip round for you.
you are missrepresenting his point, he made it clear serveral times that just pointing at 10 or 20 bug reports out of thousnads dosent proof anything
becasue how do you know that there arent any russian reports tho which happened the same
he was also asking for you to give a proper argument how those sources/ bug reports mean that russian bias is real without any other possible explenation
Clearly you’re just a Russian main for criticizing the Soviet tech tree in this regard.
Don’t you know that defending Russian equipment is what you’re supposed to do?
You’re supposed to say that the average T-80BVM is OP despite it never changing since release and no one’s claiming it’s OP anymore. Powercreep didn’t even happen.
You’re supposed to say Vikhirs are wunderwaffen better than all F&F missiles ever made.
You’re supposed to say that the 2S38 is a wunderwaffen that can beat HSTVL, CV90120, and VT-5 despite its major flaws for anything higher than its BR.
In that context yes. Even if you prove that all those claims you made are true (those 20) you have not formed any argument about WHY DO THOSE MEAN BIAS.
You literally just listed 20 things without any argument for your conclusion. That just means that those do not prove your conclusion.
I always enjoy seeing 2S38 hate posts that want it at 12.0 or something while they themselves struggling to perform to their account average in it, which is absurd.
yeah i dont understand what is so hard to get here as well
and doing mental gymnastics to prove russian bias is stupid
becasue in almost all cases the simplest awnser is the correct one and you shouldnt acuse somebody of malice and ruling out every other explenation just because it dosent fit your world view
like you could show them 1000 examples of something benefiting any other nation besides russia and they would still say that russian bias is real becasue of that one time when i droped a bomb the russian tank didnt die (or something like that)
imo russian bias is a boogyman and a meme made up by bad players so they dont have to accept that they have a skill issue
(i personally know that i suck at grb, but yet iam not crying about russian bias even tho i dont have a single match in any russian tank)
and i dont know how there is russian bias when russia literally was pretty much always worse than america for the past year or so until they got the Su-30
and even then the Su-30 still struggles against the EF and rafale
weird that the nation that apperently gets pampered by the devs isnt doing that great in either air or ground
USSR could’ve gotten the Mig-35 with corrected thrust curves and it would’ve been a perfect equivalent to the current top stuff, but there’s a stubbornness with their beliefs about RD-33s let alone RD-33MKs.
It’s a perfect storm actually.
People like to blame something else for their shortcomings.
RU was an easy target because it’s generally hated in the west.
It’s like adding 2 and 2 together.
Oh if about heli case I’m definitely know what i’m talking about i have both Apache and MI-28 and play them hundreds of times i know how they both performed compared to each other
I do think that in most other cases he would understand it, it’s just that he deluded and self indoctrinated himself so much that at this point it is next to impossible to reaso with him in this topic.
If you ever argue (or watch videos like that) of people debating falt earthers (or any other conspiracy) you will see the exact same behaviour. They most often are not dumb people, it’s just being in a cult.
I know somebody who is an otherwise smart guy but think that the moon landing was faked. in any other topic you can reason with him except this. No matter how many times and how detailed you disprove his claims, at the end “it was faked because it was”.
Exactly.
It is a meme for some (or rather a bunch) of people, but there is also a cult (who are very loud) that think it is real.
In most cases it is actually just cope for them being bad, or doing something stupid. Of course there are also just weird things that happen from time to time, of course they are bias when it is a russian tank but it is not when it’s not a russian tank.
One of the most clear example was on Dollarplays i think.
In one of his vids either he was playing with a Maus or an IS-2, but what happened was that the IS-2 shot the Maus’ turret front, it bounced into the hull and killed the tank.
Guy in the comments call that russian bias.
Then the same youtuber in one of the next vids plays the Ho-Ri and uses the same trick against the Maus, and interestingly the same guy comments on how funny it was when he killed the Maus that way. That of course was not japanese bias…
There are also those that are average/good players that normally dont believe in this bias, but hear it enough times so that they just pay attention to weird things happening with/to russian tanks and discard it when the same happens to other nations.
Effectively the same thing as wehn people say they get a bad match when they activate a 300/500% booster.
Something something because their players are sooooo bad that even with that much bias they cant play well.
Funny isnt it?
To be fair tho, the whole “you never played it so you cant talk about it” (i know you dont do it, but others do here) is just silly.