you mean air spawn stuff? i can name more than just them before they removed.
what else can during that time? but pantsir still the best didn’t they? while everybody can barely intercept incoming air munition Pantsir already shoot down probably 3 rockets oh like i said Italy Japan Israel still don’t have it during that time to they just got it recently
So what? Chinese jet also doesn’t have them Eurofighter also don’t have them only IR slinger jet that German have is F4F which can only carry like what? two mav?
that being said the weapons that only counter is to air spawn camp them should be add? if yes then Brits should have LOAL brimstone same time as KH-38MT don’t you think?
now tell me the weapons that force people to air spawn camping with minimum time to stop them is 5sec after they spawn before they wipe out your whole team while dodge best SPAA is sound fair to you?
The A-7D causing air spawns to be removed for all rank 6 and higher vehicles in the game.
Pantsir was never good against TOP CAS, and only became good against LGBU CAS in 2024.
And by good, I am talking about when both vehicles are played perfectly they have a decent chance of going 1:1.
F-15E has a zero chance of dying to Pantsir when played good to perfectly.
it’s not about win or lose at that moment is about afford that use to stop multiple KH-38MT slinger after spawn before they wiped out my team while dodging pantsir at the same time
Heh is that so?
I remember I ask you to show me your video that how can you engage multiple KH-38 slinger total stop them from killing your teammate while dodging multi pantsir at the same time before new SAM has been added yet you still show me nothing
no video
no screenshot
no nothing
only thing that you show me is the words out of your mouth
1VS1 lol
real gameplay is not 1VS1 is about against all odds
if all you going to do is saying nonsense without actually prove it you better not reply to me.
I have said it before , its all about of what eveyone thinks ‘’ Russian bias’’ is .
For someone a ‘’ Russian bias’’ proof to believe is to see russian vehicles having a 90% win rate or Russian vehicles surviving a nuclear bomb and wining the battles , no there is not such ‘’ Russian bias’’ in the game.
To be honest it would be very stupid for gjn to have such a strong ‘’ Russian bias’’ attitude because she would probably lose all ‘’ NATO players’’ or everybody would play only Russia.
If you have noticed even in real life a succesful way for advantaging something against something else is by not doing it obviously but discreetly.
I don’t know what about you? have ever got tired of spit something that you actually aren’t capable of doing it?
I don’t need other players i need it from you to show me
Oh yeah haha you can drop nuke against soviet you know what I can do that too but that not I’m asking to see what I wanna see was you engaging multi-KH-38 slinger while stop them from wiping out your teammate while dodging multiple pantsir before update then comback and we’ll talk about it yeah that what i asking around five months ago you know what? neverminded i get it you aren’t capable of doing it that why i don’t see what i been asking for enjoy what you are doing and don’t bother me again in here or anywhere else unless you still have a beef with me then inbox me not this thread.
Then maybe form an argument tha actually proves it.
Because people dont buy them anymore…
Then it is not bias, it is just easier for them to add those, thus they do it. Would you rather do:
spend somebody to archives trying to find details about a one off prototype with the possibility to not find enough info (thus "wasting time and money), OR
add another Object XYZ they can find in Kubinka or another Sherman or any vehicle they can copy-paste to several trees.
Just like germany or USA, as well as the bit bigger size of the USSR tree can easily be explained by what i above mentioned.
Just like others?!
Then you should be able to prove it with either concrete evidence or a logical argument that rules out other explanations.
So far you havent done any of those.
???
Do you relize that you can pretty much put any 2 similar vehicles against each other and in most cases one will be better?
Nono, it can only be bias with russia…
Which is actually funny since being biased towards russia would be harmful for them, since it is the western audiences that can pay, not the russians… To whom would appeal the russian bias? Certainly not to the westerns.
A few members of the mods is not the same as the company. IIRC mods arent even employees, and certainly are not paid.
This is like arguing that WG was against their playerbase when a single employee that was fired but still had access hid a really high polygon object on a map that caused even the strongest PCs to run with single digit FPS…
Do you now say that you know that there is no bias, but it just seems like it and you just deluded yourself?
Also funny that even most CASvocates here have stopped with the AA “argument” because even they realized that it is stupid.
To be fair it can as well as other ERAs when it gets volumetric’d.
You’ve been shown repeatedly to be incapable of accepting any argument that doesn’t align with your rather odd worldview.
You could certainly do with learning basic comprehension of how sources work. Feel free to flag this post like all the others.
PS- If you choose to follow up on your fellow forumite’s gracious offer of English lessons, I’m sure the forum will be happy to do a whip round for you.
you are missrepresenting his point, he made it clear serveral times that just pointing at 10 or 20 bug reports out of thousnads dosent proof anything
becasue how do you know that there arent any russian reports tho which happened the same
he was also asking for you to give a proper argument how those sources/ bug reports mean that russian bias is real without any other possible explenation
Clearly you’re just a Russian main for criticizing the Soviet tech tree in this regard.
Don’t you know that defending Russian equipment is what you’re supposed to do?
You’re supposed to say that the average T-80BVM is OP despite it never changing since release and no one’s claiming it’s OP anymore. Powercreep didn’t even happen.
You’re supposed to say Vikhirs are wunderwaffen better than all F&F missiles ever made.
You’re supposed to say that the 2S38 is a wunderwaffen that can beat HSTVL, CV90120, and VT-5 despite its major flaws for anything higher than its BR.
In that context yes. Even if you prove that all those claims you made are true (those 20) you have not formed any argument about WHY DO THOSE MEAN BIAS.
You literally just listed 20 things without any argument for your conclusion. That just means that those do not prove your conclusion.
I always enjoy seeing 2S38 hate posts that want it at 12.0 or something while they themselves struggling to perform to their account average in it, which is absurd.
yeah i dont understand what is so hard to get here as well
and doing mental gymnastics to prove russian bias is stupid
becasue in almost all cases the simplest awnser is the correct one and you shouldnt acuse somebody of malice and ruling out every other explenation just because it dosent fit your world view
like you could show them 1000 examples of something benefiting any other nation besides russia and they would still say that russian bias is real becasue of that one time when i droped a bomb the russian tank didnt die (or something like that)
imo russian bias is a boogyman and a meme made up by bad players so they dont have to accept that they have a skill issue
(i personally know that i suck at grb, but yet iam not crying about russian bias even tho i dont have a single match in any russian tank)
and i dont know how there is russian bias when russia literally was pretty much always worse than america for the past year or so until they got the Su-30
and even then the Su-30 still struggles against the EF and rafale
weird that the nation that apperently gets pampered by the devs isnt doing that great in either air or ground
