All you did was show 10-10 cherrypicked example.
How many such cases did happen over the years? 1000s. Let’s say there were a total of 1000 (very likely a huge underestimate, but for sake of easiness assume 1000).
You provided a total of 10+10=20 examples. That is literally 2% of all the cases. It is nothing more than a combination of cherrypicking and confirmation bias.
Your case would stand on a stronger leg (or rather, it would stand at all because at the moment it does not) if you would compile a list like that for every single bug, bug report and whatnot, and the results would show something favouring russia.
At that case you still have to provide a logical argument that rules out every other explanations to prove that there is russian bias.
Old forum still exist.
Tiger II not blowing up 3 times.
Here it happens this to multiple Chieftains, 3x to one in a row.
The report was accepted. It is having the correct explosive mass in game now.
It does not. Currently it pens 152mm at all angles.
Since they pen exact values of integer numbers in inches, i suspect that they just tested them for various inches and the 105mm couls spall the 5 inch plate but not the 6, while 106 and 120mm could.
Yeah totally not listed at all:
Okay, seems to be incorrect pen values in game. How does it exactly prove bias?
The M61 and M72 have also wrong values compared to irl, sooooo i guess USA bias proven, right?
And it is fixed.
Like?
This might be shocking to you, so please get ready:
It is possible to talk about an other mode in it’s context while you play a different mode.
Shocking, right?
You aim at the exact same spots in both modes.
Projection.
They appear to be as much AI writeen as your claims to appear to support the existance of russian bias: not at all.
I dont. None of my comments look like they were made by it, and exactly 0% of my comments were written or influenced by it.
Cant wait for:
You play the game in russian so your opinion is invalid!4!4!4!4!4
Wow, how dare he respond with “it does not prove anything” what my comment… does not prove anything???
What is your proof of that?
I literally havent flagged any of your posts as spam. Maybe instead of baselessly accusing others, provide evidence that they did.
Of course it is russia’s fault. When he wakes up in the morning and hits his toe in the leg of a chair - you guessed it, russia’s fault!
Where did i not provide sources?
Projection.
The difference is that he did not provide source for bias. He provided 20 cherrypicked examples from 1000s of other cases. That proves nothing!
Then you are bad at your job.
The claim is real. he provided evidence that shows that his claim is true.
But that does not mean that the conclusion is true.
Hey let’s do this: Jet fuel can’t melt steel.
Therefore 911 was an inside job.
Do you see how stupid this conclusion is? I provided sources that jet fuel cant melt steel, but that does not mean that my conclusion is correct.
What about another one:
UFOs are real thing.
Source
Therefore aliens exist.
Again, a stupid conclusion. UFOs do exist, but they do not mean that they are objects made by aliens, nor that they even exist.
If i make some weird shape and shoot it into the air or make it self propel itself, then it is a UFO.
There was basically 2 claims: 1 is that there is russia bias, and 2 is that what he listed prove it.
The things he listed are true, and he proved that they are. The conclusion however is NOT proven by those.
It got nerfed because it has incorrect amount of filler inside?!
This is just so funny. if there is even just a slight inaccuracy in a russian vehicle you guys have a meltdown about it and how it is bias, and demand to make it accurate, but when the same thing is done to your prcious NATO tanks you do a 180 and complain why it was nerfed to be accurate…
Coincidence? i think not! Margarine causes divorces in Maine!!!
