Russian Bias in 2025?

More funny that this kind of data loses it’s validity the moment it starts to conflicting with your views

2 Likes

Then what does it show then it show that RU is worse nation to play in the game? Because it had worse win rate?

Ah as always building a strawman no one said that soviet tech tree is the worst the stat was shown as proof that it isn’t most hand held nation but as classical demagogue you replaced it as of proof worst nation.

Using it as proof of Russian bias was legitimate so why it can’t be used as proof that Russian bias is hoax ?

1 Like

depend on how you look
if you look only stats then it might not
what it can do is different story
if i had to guess why Russia have sub win rate it probably because they can’t sling KH-38 for free multi kill anymore it typical for RU when something shifts their win rate goes down to hell this is not first time it happens.

So it has validity in prooving that Soviet tech tree is not most hand held nation in the game and devs adding more AA system and will add more in future proves it more.

Global Statshark data puts 12.0 RU winrate pretty much in line with German one.

For now, or short future maybe but for what they did the past they might pull some BS like KH-38 free multi kill or Pantsir or might not do it again
only time will tell.

before this we had us cas flying at 7km alt and guiding 6 agm´s at you without any counterplay.
we still have this playstyle at hightier, but noone really talks about it.

the winrates for the last month show that russia has a winrate that is almost 10% lower than the german one at 12.0
image

1 Like

well actually they do in the past but seem now about CAS top tier kinda seem peaceful for me i only see few CAS for somedays I don’t have to jump to Gripen fast as possible at start of the match to spawn kill KH-38 slinger every match like i had to before update

with hightier is meant the range from 9.0-11.0 and there is just a simple rule… stay at distance and guide your bombs from 6km or more and the radar spaa cant do shit.

1 Like

It would be so funny, since IS.7 is from around 1946-47… Same year as the ARL-44…
Also IS-4 from 1944…

Historical MM would kill the game in a day. For an even sure, it could be added, but it would be the same as the WWI event where at certain BRs (or years i guess) a nation would have like 95% win rate.

Good luck with Pz IIs and 38t VS B1 Bis and Matilda too.

It is not…

Because UK and China are comparably smaller and thus are played by better players.

image
So let’s see what he actually said:

image
image
image

I wonder why you left that part out from your quote…

let’s see the actual GLOBAL data:

Look at that! Only 0.1% difference!

you dont use all time data if you want to discuss new trends

1 Like

Irrelevant, as my point was to expose the guy being dishonest.

no these are global statistics for august 2025


grafik

1 Like

I do not want to see historical matchmaking since the whole point of this is to be as assymetic as possible, but using the newest statistic is not false

image
While it not being turned on…

Unless Motorola meant last month (which is unlikely, since his argument states that they are “pretty much in line with german one”) the most likely explanation is that he meant all time by global.

I never said it is false. What i mean is that if you think that using all time stats is bad, then you quote the WHOLE thing and explain why that thinking is bad for this current argument, and NOT quote it in a way that is obviously dishonest.

Maybe the quote thing would have been good,

It probably would have been better formulated with: all time data is irrelevant when looking at the actual performance(so its my bad).

2 Likes

I dont think it is always bad, i think there can be (a few) cases where all time data is better.
or for example a time graph, something like this:

Obviously the hard part of this representation is that you need multiple graphs for each nation and BR, since all on one graph would be unreadable.

True, sometimes you need more than just a month to detect an outlier. Personally I would take the previous months as data to see the pattern since this graphic does require more than one br range bracket to read the winrate of crertain stuff.

1 Like