To be honest arguing for “russian bias” with win rates is one of the dumbest thing. Not like most (if not all) other arguments are much better, but this is exceptionally bad.
it can say something but it doesnt have to since its not the vehicle´s who make the winrates.
1 Like
Yeah it can say “something” but that “something” is so small (if it even exists) that it is essentially “nothing”.
This bias cope was going on since the game was published, yet NOBODY could ever bring any evidence or a logical argument that would prove it, or at least show it’s existance even remotely likely.
All it is about is showing things like bugs, one off scenarios (while ignoring all the others when it happens to non russian vehciles) or just straight up not understanding mechanics of the game.
Devs are russian so they have to promote russian propaganda reeeeeee.
Admit that they are just bad at the game? No, they got killed because of russian bias! Oh what you say? He got killed by a japanese tank? Still russian bias!
Funniest one I´ve seen was someone complained he cound pen a t-34 with an m18. he uploaded a video calling it bias. This guy had HE loaded in his gun and complained he couldnt kill a t-34 with m18, he even tried to profe it with the penetration anylysis in the hangar.
Dishonest ? I think latest data which is for last month will give better representation of current meta, all-time statistics will give only confusing result’s
There are TONS of players like that. Another one (even funnier/more sad, depending on how you view it) was a guy with 50% APCR, 50% HE in his Tiger E calling it bias when he could not pen the IS-3’s upper plate with HE.
Yes, the way the guy quoted was dishonest.
Him using latest 1 month data IS NOT dishonest. What IS dishonest is quoting only the second part of the original comment in a way that completely distorts it’s meaning.
1 Like
Tbh I’m not sure what is going on with Germany, and it could be the better players are in sub nations.
But in game it really comes down to reload rate. At top tier Russia & Germany have the slowest reloads.
Germany & USA players are known for being the worst in game.
USA has the highest wr of USA, Germany, and Russia.
It’s about reload and maneuverability. Which nation has the best? USA
Yet Russia’s T-80Us all are incorrect in reload speed. They should be 6.0 sec reload speed. If you want to see the document I can send it.
Now, given the game doesn’t model a bunch of reloading factors, the T-80Us should load as quick as 4.5 secs, but that’s unbalanced.
Instead, they should make all nato 5.0 sec ace load times, 5.75 secs, fix the Russian MZ loader
1 Like
I meant global all time stats.
It’s clear the last few months haven’t been the best for RU, as one of their main selling points got neutered.
@O_HOgameplay
Nah I meant all time stats to prove RU isn’t winning more than GER is for example.
If reload is everything Type 10 would be rate as best tank in the game even above Leopard 2a7 and Strv 122 but it not, right?
RU isn’t much better than them
Type 10 from Japan
It is more like that players at top tier USA/USSR/Germany are bad. And since RB is nation VS nation, this will result in a team full of bad/worse players versus another team with better.
If we look at the same but in AB, where both team has players from all nations, the win rate is more even, while these nations still have less win rates, since their players are not that good on average.
I would like to see it if you can send it to me.
Well logically that one was more likely, so yeah.
Yes the best reload rate is the Type 10, but by 1.0 sec. It also has considerable armor gaps & its top speed might be slightly higher yes, but overall the abrams is a very good tank with a better dart.
There is a reason during the tournaments it’s often chosen.
The full load cycle for loading in an MZ loader, using every other for APFSDS.
It can be faster depending on certain factors:
- How the ammo is loaded
- If the loader has been set to auto or manual.
2 Likes
Thanks.
Also:
I dont think that the Leo 2s should have a better reload. 6s for them is fine. What SHOULD be fixed is that for some reason the empty ready rack reload on them and the Arietes is 30s, a 5-6x increase instead of the usual ~1.5x.
I was talking more like the challys, abrams, etc.
NATO load times should be higher even with ace crews because irl they vary wildly and usually it’s on the higher end, not the lower, unless they are wearing no armor, and sitting still, and have a lap load & keep the blast door open.
They also still benefit from highly unrealistic reloading + aiming at the same time with only two crew members. In this situation their reloads could realistically get up to like 20s, as the gunner needs to switch seats, load the round and then switch the seat again.
But they still somehow moan about autoloaders not being perfectly realistic and modelled correctly, blaming bias and demanding immediate change for “balancing”.
4 Likes
6 seconds is pretty average. Also listing Germany in this sentence about top tier instead of China is criminal.
Also Germany is doing well winrate because 2A7V and SLM. No matter how mid the players are, the 2A7V can carry a lot.
3 Likes
China really has their top tier MBTs neglected.
It’s one of those nations that everyone forgets to talk about.
2 Likes
still arguing over muh red muh yellow winrate from some 3rd party website
this is completely moot when there is zero transparency about how the matchmaker works
might as well be a bunch of cavemen arguing about the meaning of cloud shapes
seems to me like the russians are biased against me