The Renault FT-17 however baaaam… Its like from space with no predessor. Just this … thing … which couldn’t have constructed like this irl.
I don’t see ship all i see is just unfinish hull that probably unable to complete
never finish never sail probably never even touch sea water at all.
Who say i don’t?
if it does not exist then remove it along with other fake stuff in the game too for all i care.
damn i guess you cant read
it was laid out by gaijin that the requirements for ships differ from the ones for tanks and planes
yeah we all see that you are coping
1 Like
and i see that you cant read
i explained that the requierments for ships to be added to the game are different from tanks and planes
and it is enough for them to have started construction on them
that was openly stated before
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
if you cant read the suggestion rules and what can be added that is not my issue
so you arent even trying to argue anymore
please just leave the internet for a few years until you have grown up to be an adult
3 Likes
So what? The devs’ criteria for ships is different.
Why?
Idk, maybe, juuuust maaaaaybe because you can’t just build a “prototype” battleship and see how it will work. You can do it with a tank or a plane, since they are just a few tons, and not 30.000 that takes 1000s of people’s work for years.
If the ship had at least some of it’s unique parts made, then it is fine for WT.
That’s why can they add later the H-39, A-150 (possibly even the 500.000 ton Zipang xd), and some French project battleship (they had their guns made, it is even visible on google maps).
Because you then would complain about ALL of them, not singling out a single nation.
It DID exist.
My that “logic” should we remove the Kpz-70 since it’s autoloader did not work? Or remove Panthers because their final drives were bad?
EVERY navy.
Hey, let’s do some counting, shall we?
Project ships:
USA: no project ships that i could find.
Germany:
Z15 Erich Steinbrinck
Z46
Ersatz Yorck
Sachsen
Mackensen
Gneisenau
Z47
USSR:
Izmail
Kronshtadt
Soyuz
Sevastopol
Shcherbakov
Britain: no project ships that i could find.
Japan:
Amagi
Italy:
Comandante Margottini
Etna
Francesco Caracciolo
Conte di Cavour
France:no project ships that i could find.
2 Likes
this hull looks pretty laid down to me:
1 Like
do you have the whole report?
i would like to take a look at the whoel thing if you have it
Remember when the Roland was top for years, or the flakrakrad ?
Funnily enough, Italy is getting the best spaa finally
Do you want historical match making? Because you’ll make me laugh for a good while if you do.
Many Soviet designs came before west deigns.
Say you want to play the M60, well, your fighting T-62s
You want to play a Jumbo or a Pershing? Your seeing IS-2s
You want to use a T29? IS-3,4,6,7, & T-54s are what you would see.
M1 abrams? T-80B and T-72Bs.
These are the most similar year to year tanks. I could list a vastly bigger list
1 Like
Roland? what? there are ADATS and 2S6 when Roland first came out and those are better than Roland
Funny then why Britain and China have better win-rate than Russia despite having stuff worse than Russia at top tier? Hell both even have better win rate than US/Ger so this didn’t prove Russia are worse nation ever existed in WT
Great strawman
Why does Russia not even have a 50% win rate if it is so hand held
Why does the US and Germany have way higher win rates even this the player skill should be more or less the player skill with them all being major nations
2 Likes
Still doesn’t charge what i said
if you think Ger are so handheld why it still have win rate worse than Brits and China? does because British tech tree is better than German or Russia?
I don’t think so.
It also depends on how often the nation gets teamed up with other nations with trash vehicles
3 Likes