do you have the whole report?
i would like to take a look at the whoel thing if you have it
Remember when the Roland was top for years, or the flakrakrad ?
Funnily enough, Italy is getting the best spaa finally
Do you want historical match making? Because you’ll make me laugh for a good while if you do.
Many Soviet designs came before west deigns.
Say you want to play the M60, well, your fighting T-62s
You want to play a Jumbo or a Pershing? Your seeing IS-2s
You want to use a T29? IS-3,4,6,7, & T-54s are what you would see.
M1 abrams? T-80B and T-72Bs.
These are the most similar year to year tanks. I could list a vastly bigger list
2 Likes
Roland? what? there are ADATS and 2S6 when Roland first came out and those are better than Roland
Funny then why Britain and China have better win-rate than Russia despite having stuff worse than Russia at top tier? Hell both even have better win rate than US/Ger so this didn’t prove Russia are worse nation ever existed in WT
Great strawman
Why does Russia not even have a 50% win rate if it is so hand held
Why does the US and Germany have way higher win rates even this the player skill should be more or less the player skill with them all being major nations
2 Likes
Still doesn’t charge what i said
if you think Ger are so handheld why it still have win rate worse than Brits and China? does because British tech tree is better than German or Russia?
I don’t think so.
It also depends on how often the nation gets teamed up with other nations with trash vehicles
3 Likes
That too isn’t T-80U premium just sales recently too?
More funny that this kind of data loses it’s validity the moment it starts to conflicting with your views
2 Likes
Then what does it show then it show that RU is worse nation to play in the game? Because it had worse win rate?
Ah as always building a strawman no one said that soviet tech tree is the worst the stat was shown as proof that it isn’t most hand held nation but as classical demagogue you replaced it as of proof worst nation.
Using it as proof of Russian bias was legitimate so why it can’t be used as proof that Russian bias is hoax ?
1 Like
depend on how you look
if you look only stats then it might not
what it can do is different story
if i had to guess why Russia have sub win rate it probably because they can’t sling KH-38 for free multi kill anymore it typical for RU when something shifts their win rate goes down to hell this is not first time it happens.
So it has validity in prooving that Soviet tech tree is not most hand held nation in the game and devs adding more AA system and will add more in future proves it more.
Global Statshark data puts 12.0 RU winrate pretty much in line with German one.
For now, or short future maybe but for what they did the past they might pull some BS like KH-38 free multi kill or Pantsir or might not do it again
only time will tell.
before this we had us cas flying at 7km alt and guiding 6 agm´s at you without any counterplay.
we still have this playstyle at hightier, but noone really talks about it.
the winrates for the last month show that russia has a winrate that is almost 10% lower than the german one at 12.0
1 Like
well actually they do in the past but seem now about CAS top tier kinda seem peaceful for me i only see few CAS for somedays I don’t have to jump to Gripen fast as possible at start of the match to spawn kill KH-38 slinger every match like i had to before update