Devs said that they won’t move to the Cold War era for big ships for near future or ever so your proposition is for maybe for half of the decade or forever is to delete one of the big three the naval top ship this is just not profitable decision.
Japan is a major issue when it comes to fake vehicles and double standard that creates.
Also, Sweden has one of the best ground lineups for years now, despite being a minor nation. I think this is expected as one of the devs publicly stated he enjoys Sweden.
Isn’t China handheld as well ?
2 Likes
Yeah but China propaganda makes russia’s look reasonable lmao, only way he will feel China is realistic in WT is if AFT09 can tank a GBU-24
So i’m letting him know he can get that experience playing russia like all his buddies do
How can this be the best tank setup with NATO equipment is Russian bias to the whole world is now Russian bias there is no escape just like Putin said borders of Russia never end @AlvisWisla was right he is russian propagandist.
@ShOt_MaCkEr
Ship rules aren’t even different in a positive way.
Ground vehicles, aircraft, and ship rules are identical in one regard: If it entered production, it’s possible to add.
M10 Booker is the same exact state as Sovetsky Soyuz. Was entering production then cancelled.
Ships just don’t have prototype rules.
Britain isn’t USSR, ShotMacker.
@Thodin
The rule was to allow ships form many nations, including France, Britain, and Italy.
All to compete against USA.
I can’t imagine opposing ships for France, Italy, and Britain just because one’s upset over one ship.
Yeah, but they’re not so unbalanced and op. They’re also more realistic, since they’re often just sidegrades with a bit more AA or just aren’t much stronger that existing ships.
Probably because other countries indeed built and finished capital ships. Those knew whats posssible to construct and what wasn’t.
Britain didn’t. One of its forum suggestions is the same state as M10 Booker [tank[ and Soyuz.
And I want to see it.
I want to see all production vessels that sadly had to be cancelled mid-production.
Britain’s cancelled BB would be one of the strongest too.
Germany’s ingame ones are just not special.
York battlecruiser just uses the same 38cm guns from Bayern class BBs, protections wise, speed etc. … nothing special.
Sachsen is just a Bayern class with ugly superstructure and additional 4 AA guns.
The event Mackensen also fits this sceme.
If Gajin ever introduces H41, 42 ets, it also would be just a slight improvement over Bismark. Bit more pen, almost identical protection. No outliers.
Soyuz however baaaam… Its like from space with no predessor. Just this … thing … which couldn’t have constructed like this irl.
Heh by your logic maybe Sweden should also get battleship too don’t you think?
To build the Project 23 battleships, only 4 R-5 missiles and control systems for them would be needed, and all this in 1941.
did sweden ever start building a battle ship?
if no then not
Chinese top tier MBTs are very underpowered compared to how they should be IRL. The main artificial nerfs they’re dealing with are a longer reload, and complete lack of spall liners.
Overall top tier China has one of the worst lineups. They have poor CAS, a mediocre SPAA from what I’ve heard, and bottom 3 MBTs. They are also missing a lot of light tanks, but that isn’t unique to China.
2 Likes
I don’t know but since Russia fantasy ship can be in the game why not Sweden since they both have one thing in common
It does not exist.
He probably confused it with project-23-3x3-456 or with project 24
Spall liners are a marginal feature.
And reloads of 7.1 seconds is still more than usable.
China’s top lineup is great.
Type 99A is a top 10 MBT.
@ARK_BOI
There are no fantasy ships in War Thunder. All ships in-game have proof of production.
If they were paper ships they wouldn’t have been added to begin with, and the War Thunder community has evidence for every ship in the game.
they made the hull for king tiger 105… so it’s not a paper tank
cope
They were all laid down.
Of course you have zero issues with the german Ersatz Yorck, of which there is no photos and was about 1% or less complete. That ship is not phantasy, but those that were 10-20% complete are phantasy ships.
Funny what delusions can do.
2 Likes