come on where are your sources?
not showing sources
and then starting to insult ppl
that is how you win arguments, great job
2 Likes
seems like someone wants sources without having some of their own to this topic and is mad just for you naming the thread…
so show me your type 10 source for the reload
i have yet to see it
havent done any claims, and just looking at some videos you will find some with less than 4 seconds reload
I just said this is a mess of a bug report
(IIRC it was the armor, the acceleration and the suspension that got fixed) maybe I´ve forgotten something but this is the stuff rn that comes to my mind rn
Tired of this, I never asked into an argument over documents, at 1:44 AM, angry russian mains fuming that i criticise gaijin for generous balancing and modelling choices, and got mr ermm actually telling me to spend hours digging up sources for an offhand comment, one that is a pre-known fact anyway to anyone interested in MBTs in general,
Antways report my posts so I can leave this thread without future pestering 🫶
1 Like
look at this russian main
right here:
you made a claim and i want to see a source for that claim simple as
and if you think that is unreasonable then that shows how dishonest you are
Shrödinger’s russian mains
1 Like
probably for the better(too late for digging sources out of the depths of this forum)
1 Like
iam just gonna leave this link here
The angry russian mains in question
you are not agreeing with him
now you are one of the angry russian mains
1 Like
No no i’m one of the
gaijin staff says Buk M3 is the worst
buff it immediately and send his message as evidence
he is not gaijin staff
suggestion moderators are volunteers
1- Non-meta.
2- NATO manpads are superior despite inaccuracies, this disproves your point.
3- Soviet ERA is not and has never over-performed. Kontakt 1 is the worst ERA in the game, and Relikt protects ~54mm of kinetic flat. These are not notable.
4- Soviet MBTs are supposed to have poor survivability. The fact they’re poor in War Thunder as well is just obvious.
5- Yeah, every tank prior to modern MBTs over perform. T-64 is not special alongside M60, Centurion, Vickers Mk1, etc.
6- 2S38 disproves Soviet bias, it came in like EBR and others though better off since Gaijin had the Begleitpanzer to have some indication of where 2S38 should be, and it was too low. Welcome to new vehicles with little to no things to compare them to.
7- Pantsir is bad, just objectively bad against IR AGM CAS. Hate my criticism all you want, it’s valid criticism. All I had to do for over a year was fly high and stay beyond 13km and Pantsirs just couldn’t touch me.
8- 4 years? Soviet CAS has only been as OP as NATO CAS for 1 year, 3 months:
9- “Russian” armor is entirely declassified. It’s performing as the schematics show. Relikt is not as good as you claim.
10- Kh-38MT, which once again, was only OP for 1 year and 3 months. 1 missile.
11- Su-25 and A-10 BR issues disprove Soviet bias.
12- Su-25BM came to the game to test R-73s… and it did. Not sure what’s controversial about that.
13- You mean it not having R-77s? lol
14- Because USA and Japan had to have AIM-7Fs which were the only long range BVR missile in the game at the time. The power creep R-27ER caused was less than what AIM-7Fs caused.
15- It’s an IFV… they’re not special.
Your list shows nothing.
DM53 was designed to perforate through Kontakt 5 and T-72B UFP array. The designers of the round never mentioned Relikt because that ERA didn’t exist yet.
Ron has not defended Russian MBTs either.
1 Like
same thing - also clearly he’s given extra consideration so better take advantage of that and get that buff
so what are you even trying to achive here besides looking like an imature child?
don’t worry about what I want
ask yourself why you need bias and still remain mediocre