I guess all those uparmored Leopards aren’t in the game with us.
Or you actually might be wrong.
I know that’s a weird concept to you.
Data taken straight out of your ass, like always to be honest.
I guess all those uparmored Leopards aren’t in the game with us.
Or you actually might be wrong.
I know that’s a weird concept to you.
Data taken straight out of your ass, like always to be honest.
im not reading all that
happy for you
or sorry that it happened
Reading 3 sentences is “all that” for you ?
That explains a lot.
Puts fingers in his ears and goes la-la-la the moment counter points have been brought up.
Never underestimate the power of tinfoil theorist’s minds. They are too busy imagining things that they can barely function as normal humans.
Japanese and French tank are also blessed with fuel explosions.
Navy also; never built or imaginary ships with ridiculously low BR’s abound in ALL ranks. Then if you post anything remotely resembling criticism of anything Russian, devs take it down because a complaint was made flagging it as ADVERTISING SPAM. Just goes to show…devs don’t check or do anything regarding false complaints. That’s better, nothing like a good rant to lower the blood pressure.
“that bias is real is”
Meanwhile Russian tanks:
• Have the worst reload at top tier
• The worst reverse gear
• Some tanks have worse gun elevation drives than rank I tanks
• Can be easily killed as any other tank except Leo’s.
• Has the 2nd worst top tier dart.
• worse mobility (T-72s, T-80s are decent)
Tbh I think I’ve seen it the most on Ussr and China, both occurring to me, and to people I shoot.
There’s the rare USA, Jap, Italy, and Brit fuel explosions I’ve seen.
I’ve never seen it happen on a German, Israel, or French tank though.
Every nation has fake ships…? Even the US tech tree does lol. Japan does, Germany does, Ussr does, I think Italy may be the one exception here.
the T-90 is basically a modernisation of the T-72 so it has pretty similar mobility compared to it
The T-90 is still a T-72 at heart that’s why I didn’t mention T-90s
Nah, they have smaller weakspots (because the tanks are smaller) and they have armor on the UFP and the sides of the first quarter of the tank. Everything besides a 2A7 has paper all over the hull
That’s what I said…
No? You said theyre as easy to kill as any non Leo tank which is not true due to the vastly better hull armor and smaller weakspots
If you play on smaller maps, T-series tanks weakspots are the same size.
T-80BVM also has no turret armor; not as bad as Ariete, not as good as Leopard 2A4’s.
I still remember when I tested T-80BVM and who would shoot my UFP vs turret, and only Abrams shot my UFP while everyone else correctly shot the turret or side armor.
I even showed Abrams players my side armor and some still chose to shoot the UFP instead.
Thing is it’s hard to not hit a fuel tank on a T-XX pattern tank so you’re rolling the dice more often. Whenever I run games in the Type 10 or Leclerc I’ll get a fair few fuel explosions but it’s more bad luck since you’re not guaranteed to get a fuel tank hit.
That’s where it’s really annoying, the tanks that are most affected by it are already some of the least likely to tank a hit.
There’s also the matter that unlike with the turret basket, Gaijin never came forward wether fuel explosions were a deliberate mechanic intended to nerf survivability or a bug.