This is false, it’s one of the best.
Testing in custom environment is whole different story then real battle. Over the years I asked you several times to provide replay which would support your claim.
You never did, so I have no reason to believe any of your “S1 cannot defend against western CAS”…
I have plenty of experience with AGM65 platforms an it never was an easy fight facing all seeing and sneaky S1.
You asked during times when I stopped playing CAS or was busy with other things.
Custom matches give the SPAA more advantage than the aircraft, which would benefit your argument.
Random battles gives CAS far more advantage than custom matches ever will.
All SPAA is sneaky BTW.
I gave everyone 1v1 opportunities, and 3? people took me up on that offer and their Pantsirs got ruined by F-15E and F-16C, and I just stayed out of their missile range.
If you look at the whole line up with tanks, helis and cas, then yes.
But only the tanks, meh. T80BVM is the only real competitor here and even that one is worse than others.
On top of this, can we also get a lap loading?
1 Like
I propose to improve NATO tanks and bring their transmissions up to Soviet level
No, it’s not lol. It’s good in certain areas, worse in others.
The best all rounder is USA
I would say Russia is mid, but closer to Italy
Refer to my earlier post:
Sure, do we also get fatigue and slower reload while moving ?
2 Likes
On this topic, can we get it so loading can’t happen at 40 mph on manual loaded tanks, since the loader would go flying when the tank turns?
That guy also is not in full kit, and left the blast door open the whole time negating it’s effects
Also let’s simulate the blast door being opened when grabbing a shell
2 Likes
That doesn’t happen on leopards, nato crews are built different.
1 Like
Imagine the loader drops the shell while at speed and the turret gets jammed lolz
1 Like
Black Octopuses in NATO Tank Crews Are Bias
I had a guy in my apc in the back when i was driving full speed through the training ground. In the end he had to go to the hospital because a rocket launcher fell on his head.
And he was just sitting trying to hold on, not attempting to load a gun.
3 Likes
2 Likes
Oh Jesus XD
That’s exactly what I mean though! Like if nato crews want lap loads, they better be driving at 15 mph or less, and they always want the quick loads etc.
Yet they fail to consider:
The blast door would have to be open
The crew member would be wearing no protection
The tank cannot traverse too quickly otherwise the loader may trip and knock himself out or something lol.
You best be driving on even terrain, imagine jumping a hill at 25 mph.
There is potent enough rounds in every nation by now that they should really just fix the T-80Us MZ loader speed.
1 Like
Really? For example Ito90, FlaRadRak gives you nice RWR warning…
And you dont have any record of it… what a coincidence so no proof…
Have you tried using IRST ? And if you see S1 you can asume he launches at you, not that hard to do. In addition a lot of top tier planes have MAW.
2 Likes
Search radar giving a RWR ping doesn’t matter a whole lot when IRT doesn’t.
10 second T-72 and T-80 reload because moving. ;)
Absolutely, I would trade it for 1.5s lap loaded second shot.
And while we are at it, lets add regenerative steering, realistic stabilizers and FCS or realistic gear shifting.