I’ll add you to the “biased and unintelligent, skill issue list”
It is just 3 helis but it is essentially god mode, so it is still very significant and would/should never be allowed to happen with a NATO heli. Let alone for 3 months
You must be speaking in sarcasm, nobody is that insane.
Don’t bring china into these bias discussions, they get screwed over so hard when it comes to everything else. Also, 3 helis that few people play is nothing compared to American CAS/american planes being so much more dominant in air battles.
China benefits strongly from russian bias both directly and indirectly
These helis are common and the Z10ME in particular has been in nearly every game now that CN players have discovered that it’s invulnerable to IR SAM (same with how they discovered the micro recon exploit)
Air battles are utterly irrelevant to this convo.
Smartest bias riders right there.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
China has some of the worst top tier tanks because Gaijin keeps them nerfed by not adding their spall liners. Their CAS is a single helicopter, or a Flanker with 6 KH-29s, and their top SPAA isn’t too good from what I’ve heard. If anything there’s an anti-China bias.
I’m bringing up air battles because it relates to the topic of this thread, and them alone can completely disprove any thoughts of Russian bias, or Russian domination.
They benefit from overperforming ERA, autoloaders eating rounds that would otherwise be lethal, they have excellent optics, insane IFVs, the HQ17 is good, the CS5 has LOAL missiles with fictional burn times, time fuzed rounds, the heli is invulnerable, the TY90 is also pure fantasy… They’re the 2nd most handheld nation, and this latest “bug” with LDIRCM proves it.
Air battles are still irrelevant because the teams are mixed. I wouldn’t have a problem with russian bias if both teams in ground had Kh38, Pantsirs, pinpoint accuracy Vikhrs and scifi ERA. Please tell me you can understand that at least…
Your honesty is lies with lousy escuses
You know what nonsense is ? It’s when you claim that Soviet tanks have bias but your own performance on T-80UM2 is relativley lesser than your own average even worse than on Ariete PSO.
I think you’re just making things up to prove your own biases against the real life nations of China and Russia at this point. Where’s that handholding when it comes to implementing literally everything accurately? What about the whole mess with the new SQV that was implemented so terribly they had to make a separate post about fixing it? Or how about the 2+ year old bug reports regarding spall liners in their MBTs.
Not really.
As does everything else that has volumetric BS.
Do they?
I think I’d hear more about them if they were.
Do you have any evidence to back up your claims.
Do you have any proof?
You can’t just say something is irrelevant if it negates your opinions. Still doesn’t change the fact that US CAS is by far the most oppressive and OP in the whole game.
If i had such a bias, russia would not have been my first completed air tree
Cope
Cope
Yes
Cope
Laws of physics and common sense
I gave a detailed explanation and you ignored it, no wonder you changed your name
Excellent optics?
WZ1001 | 11.0x
VT4 | 10.0x
ZTZ99A | 11.0x
M1A2 SEP | 13.0x
M1A2 SEP V2 |13.0x
All Leopard 2s having 12.0x and RU also 12.0x, worst you meant? More zoom is always better. And don’t even mention about the thermal quality its the second lowest, only tiny bit better than Leo 2A5/6 lol
To add on a bit
While Russia isn’t necessarily hand held, They definitely have a history of getting broken toys that does kinda solidify that thought of Russian favoritism. (Not being outright bias)
The most notable examples being the ka50, 2s38, and BI (Still ongoing) when they first came to the game. Ka50 being basically a first spawn cas that no aa could defend against. And the 2s38 surviving basically perfect shots to its front while being able to basically disable every tank it came across. (Back when barrels weren’t 900mm in armor apparently)
Along with getting the best atg weapon with the best spaa in the game at the time (Buggy radar or not)
For basically 2 years while other nations cant even get fire/forget weapons because “It’d be to op”
Then tie in that they’ve never really been left behind for an update like other nations have been and having bugs that benefit them greatly. (Ex: Bad ERA coding, First Full premium lineup, Most recent LDRICM that nullifies every IR missile.)
Its very easy to start seeing a pattern that might not be the whole truth.
Though i kinda agree there’s no bias, there’s definitely some favoritism and a lack of general across the board balance / equipment for many nations.
The 2S38 is also a massive problem for NATO teams. The fact that most players can spawn a better Otomatic at any second negates NATO helis across many BRs. Any other game dev would have restricted its proxy ammo count (like they did with the Bagel for a long time), but not gaijin of course
Any ground-spike vehicle is like 5 times worse encounter for helicopter than 2s38.
Most broken as in most bugs or as in the best?
Also is this based on ground only, air only or both air and ground?
The revised autoloader arbitrarily not also jamming the turret drive(s), where the Turret basket being damaged does. The fact that it doesn’t is odd considering the explanation of why the basket was modeled the way it was in the excerpt from Gaijin’s article explaining their reasoning.
Especially considering that the autoloader and ammo are two different modules it is an inconstant stance, its not as if neither the Abrams or Leopards had Ammo stowage in the fighting compartment, central at that (from certain angles).
So? were loaders not also implemented part of the crew modules, why doesn’t damage to the autoloader also prevent slewing of the Turret, the same way the turret basket now does?
It’s not as if they aren’t attached to the turret, the same way the Basket is, so is it not fair to assume that they should be treated similarly?
There are far more 2S38 players than there are Spike players especially at the criminally low 2s38 BR (with freccia being the rare exception)
Spike vehicles also don’t carry many, so they are more likely to be out of ammo when a heli shows up
Finally Russian helis can stay much further away than Nato helis and remain effective (detection less likely - surviving a spike more likely)
inb4 “but muh FnF missiles” → useless after about mid-game once there are wrecks everywhere, especially when looking at the AO from the low altitude you are required to be at (unlike russian and chinese helis which almost always fly straight up)
Best and overall for ground.
You need to rewrite this, your English is so broken I cannot understand it.