I mean the Kh38 caused them to add the new AAs almost single handedly.
Now only 1 or 2 of the new AAs are truely good (SLM is stupidly strong and CLAWS is decent) and all the others are mid or even sad, but at least some nations got good new AAs.
I mean the Kh38 caused them to add the new AAs almost single handedly.
Now only 1 or 2 of the new AAs are truely good (SLM is stupidly strong and CLAWS is decent) and all the others are mid or even sad, but at least some nations got good new AAs.
I was launching outside of SPAA range with AGM-65s from 2022 to October 2024, and again recently in early 2025.
I stopped spawning CAS cause it was boring being unkillable.
Brimstone can be un-nerfed when those jets are put to 13.3 or higher in ground.
agm65 usually takes 2 hits to kill (on an MBT) where as kh38 is able to kill people who are grouped together and as far as brimstone is concerned i mean only the top BR planes should be fire and forget and the others should stick to SAL
Brimstone with the initial UFO flightmodel of the EF was more than capable, people just didn’t know how to use it.
Thats why you dive down on tanks to hit the roof.
Acting like the Hammers and the AGM-65s are somehow on the same level as the KH38MT is laughable. The KH is much better in literally every regard and the other 2 do actually exist
@H_ngma
You replied to the wrong post cause you literally repeated my take.
Post has been updated with more details.
anti air cover makes this risky at best (not that there shouldn’t be some risk involved)
No? Alongside would imply that theyre on a similar level which is just not true at all. Comparing the 3 weapons shows a bias since the one thats already a lot better than the others is also the only one that doesnt exist irl
@H_ngma
You inferred that.
So are you arguing against my claim that Kh-38 is superior?
Or are you agreeing with me that Kh-38 is superior in direct comparison?
bait used to believable
The difference betwen the Kh38 and Hammers is the speed and the explosive filler. The last (in the Hammers) is more then enough. And tbf the hammers had GNSS long before it was addet to the KH.
Btw Kh38L do exist, and it is used in the recent conflict that shall not be named.
Thats true, you can only do it when it’s clear.
Again no. Youre purposefully misunderstanding my comment. Your claim that the KH38 is op “alongside” the hammers and mavs implies that theyre on a similar level which is just wrong. Me arguing against your comment does not mean that i think that the Kh is not op i just disagree with you putting all 3 on a similar level.
@H_ngma
Missiles being OP does not make them equal.
My posts say Kh-38 is superior in direct comparison.
Zero of my posts say they are equal.
Your posts are the only posts in this entire topic that have the word “equal” with those three missiles.
" the only difference between them are the only 2 things that matter in the game" (since seekers are pretty much the same in game). No one is complaining against KH38s in general but the MT version is the dubious one
this right here lmao
Yeah ofc your argument changes when you edit your comment so it fits my critique lol
@Columbia6448 defending Kh-38s with his life by omitting details.
My arguments never changed.
@H_ngma
Kh-38 is currently the superior kinematic missile, you cannot gaslight me into thinking I made any other argument when I never did.
never what?
Maybe your argument didnt change in your head but your initial comment that i answered to is now double the lenght it was before. If it was like that initially i would have nothing to complaing about but it wasnt.