Well ig ur playstyle is camping and sniping so for u its maybe be better but for the average player t72 is more forgiving with its amazing armor especially in hull down
I also thinks t72a is better for flanking and kill sreaks
Even for brawling I would pick the Gal Batesh any day of the week.
Agree to disagree
How you gonna hull down with no gun depression
2 Likes
First of all -6 is ok depression
Now more so on low profile tank
And u add this thing that called “position”
Even gaijin themselfs said it in a recent video about the t72
Find a spot when u dond need much derpression its not that hard
Maybe because I literally work in the industry, and know how things are done, unlike the vast majority of the nutcases on here and reddit.
It’s all business, Gaijin, the studio, doesn’t give a shit about any specific nation, they just want money. I’m not talking about specific people within the company, I’m talking the company as a whole, this sort of thread sounds like a Twitter Gamergate space where they pick a tweet by a lowly employee from a big studio and extrapolate their trash takes to the whole studio/industry.
The playstyle that’s bad for NATO tanks…
Depends on ur armor
If ur leo or abrams then its good playstyle
Low risk but low reward too
RU tank having shit gun depression actually save me quite a few times
also kills me a few times too
2 Likes
When Brimstone was introduced into the game, its main advantage — F&F — was removed. Gaijins, both in the dev blog and here on the forum, tried to convince everyone that it couldn’t be done any other way, because otherwise the missile would be too overpowered, etc. That you can’t add a weapon into the game that would allow players to kill from long distances with no way to defend against it.
And in the following patches they gave Russia two supersonic carriers of the Kh-38, six of them each.
Spoiler
If that’s not Russian bias, then I don’t know what Russian bias is.
4 Likes
I remember from history lessons how once, in 1939, these same Western countries declared Germany the bad guy. What do they even think they’re doing?
1 Like
Yeah. That’s why he was fired when the scandal blew up on Reddit. But before that, he worked at the company and did whatever he wanted.
Do you have evidence Kh-38, AGM-65, and Hammer are radar guided missiles?
Do you have evidence Hammer and AGM-65 are Russian?
Once again, there is zero evidence of Russian bias and you just admitted to it by implying IR AGMs are both radar guided, and all Russian.
Not only that, but IR AGMs are not safe weapons at top BR to use anymore due to CLAWS, Spyder, and SLM.
It was removed because it was MMW would be stupidly broken and would have to be severely handicapped to be balanced. Not to mention that the EFT has 18 of them.
So yeah MMW brimstones on the EFT would put the Su-30 to shame in terms of how broken it would be.
Best they could have done is add the brimstone with a placeholder IR seeker like on the maverick and limit the F&F variant to 6 max on the EFT.
3 Likes
Exactly this. They went completely fantasy with the brimstones anyway so theres no reason to make them straight up the worst top tier A2G weapon. If russia gets a weapon with a made up seeker then why not give the brimstones the same treatment
1 Like
But they didn’t do that. Instead, when it comes to a Russian missile, nobody seems to worry about how overpowered it is. That’s an example of Russian bias for you.
2 Likes
Kh-38 has not been OP since the major update dropped.
And Kh-38 was OP alongside Hammer and AGM-65 until the new SPAA was added.
Thanks for proving no Russian bias.
And of course Kh-38 is superior in a vacuum.
3 OP missiles at top BR until new SPAA was introduced.
agm 65 was nowhere near as busted as kh-38 lmao
brimstone should be un-nerfed (at top BR specifically)
2 Likes