A bad player who is facing all nations enemies when playing should have "justification examples’’ for all these nations and not only for Russia and the same thing applies to server issues , bad codes etc so why this vast majority on media and forums about russian bias exists?
not really persuative …
Exactly. These are the most powerful shells at this BR, and they still can’t penetrate the T-72’s turret. Moreover, it’s not uncommon for a shot to the T-72’s hull to knock out the driver and the autoloader, allowing the T-72 itself to fire back.
After the newest spaa update, Yea the pantsir isnt the best anymore but That doesn’t discount that the pantsir was the best spaa for those 2 years with ito and then adats coming after that.
Lack of fuel is why its 6.3!?! What about the me163 or ki200 at 8.3 with the same exact issue?
Again, its got the fuel efficiency of an nuclear ion drive which basically nullifies that. (It should have worse fuel efficiency when its not at 100%) It can accelerate to above 500mph in less then 20 seconds starting from 100mph and turns better then most early jets when its slow. Only compression really limiting its bnz capability. its an 8.3 jet minimum at 6.7.
It still shouldn’t have thermals sense it was only fitted onto 1 t80b (Or its name should say its a prototype). Again, 5 abrams with du hull as an counter example sense “apparently” it not the same.
Equally wrong? Not sure what you mean here but please explain.
Because Russia (and Germany) generally have more heavily armored tanks or more volumetric BS tanks.
Besides that confirmation bias is one hell of a drug. When bad players read online about it they’ll subconsiously go looking for examples of it in their gameplay, even if those examples have nothing to do with Russian bias.
I have yet to see a single convincing argument that Russian bias is real.
If that happens to someone with rounds like DM63 and Type 1985 that is a massive shot placement issue.
You don’t need to pen turret to kill gun or gunner or enough crew to disable tank.
Well then they making mistake DM-63 can easily pen hull you can just shoot drivers optics or kill gunner trough hull.
@tensilaspider
The best of garbage is still garbage.
Pantsir was so bad I stopped playing CAS cause never dying to SPAA for over 2 years straight was not fun anymore. When there is nothing to learn, it is boring.
That fuel efficiency claim works on Me 163 as well which has 6x the fuel on <81% thrust.
Also the thermals were on dozens of service T-80Bs, not just one. They were used for command where T-80Us fitted with thermals weren’t available.
The prototypes Abrams are not in-game at this time.
I’m a bit unclear why the T-72 would just sit there and patiently wait while I take out its gunner or the driver’s optics. Wouldn’t it shoot back at me in the meantime, and all it needs to do is hit the silhouette?
Where
Now you just making excuses is that difficult to hit biggest part of the tank ? Just right side of the hull from you
Near an unremarkable tree in the east of a European country.
Lolwut? I’m not making excuses, I’m explaining why you have problems with logic.
So you don’t have any, shocker.
Logic of what ? You think T-72A doesn’t need to aim specifict part of the tank to disable it ? It’s not logic it’s personal bias, delusion and fallacy
Why, there are actually two videos. I can’t post them here, but you can search for them yourself with the query “Ka-52 Stugna”.
The T-72 will shoot at you too lol.
Oh wow so what’s your solution of this “problem” ? Delete T-72A gun cuz it will shoot at you too ? If playing competitive game is too much you can go for single player games in easiest difficulty with cheats
So…Your counterpoint for why the ussr had the best spaa in the game for 2 years, was because they all sucked in general?
I do agree that all spaa generally sucked to any competent cas pilot. I would have liked if this update happened at least 6 months after the pantsir came.
But still, Saying team A with a bow & arrow is the same as team B with a rock sense both are killed by the guy with a gun is not a good counter argument as to why the team A has the obvious better weapon to fight back against the guy with a gun for over 2 years.
So, the me163 should be around 7.0. - 7.3 then right? Specifically because of the fuel? Or lower actually sense it accelerates far slower then the Bi and turns worse then it? (I know i said turns slightly better then early jets, But after a quick test drive, It can hold 12G’s at 300mph. Slightly Better then the premium ariete.
This i would actually like to see. (For a lot more weapons in general as well)
Though right now with how they work, The kh38 is still the best atg missile in the game by far.
The version in game is the 1985 T-80B design that shouldn’t be the version with thermals. Though if im wrong, can you show me what source your using?
At first, I tried to understand why you were feeding me all this nonsense, but then I looked at your stats and realized that you don’t play anything but Soviet vehicles lol.
To make it a little clearer for you: competitive games are very hard for me, but when I’m in a T-72, they’re less hard, got it? Because the T-72 is OP at its BR.
I also saw a video of a Patriot exploding short after launch this week.
So Patriot useless?
No way lol it should be the opposite, the T-72 will be at a disadvantage in long range because of the shitty zoom level, except for the ZTZ96 which also doesn’t zoom shit, the rest of the mbts at 9.3 can see so much better because they have better zoom level, which helps with reaction speed and shot accuracy. Then in CQC distance, the kpz-70/mbt-70 might have a lot more to lose when head-on the t-72 because the apfsds sucks with only having the stopping power of m735, while others its a 50/50 because both can kill each others as easily, like you are point blank there is no way you fail to disable or kill the t-72 in one hit lol
No idea. Wait, do we even have the Patriot in the game?