So they do indeed has their own br where they are shit, so where is that logic behind ru best at everything?
1 Like
Meanwhile the Pantsir couldn’t even frag GBU guided CAS for the first year of its introduction.
Wow, USSR gets something China has… much wow.
1 Like
I don’t know what you’re talking about. The Russian tech tree is the most comfortable to grind in the whole game. They either have good tanks, or at some BRs even OP tanks.
1 Like
Your performance in Soviet tanks is identical to your average stats.
Your stats disprove your claims.
1 Like
That’s a rather vague term to describe how one nation is overperforming, which one of the ru vehicles you performed exceptionally well compared to other NATO counterparts you’ve also played? every nation has its own ups and down across different brs, USA bias because their 9.0 has M247?
1 Like
Wait, you want me to list them all? Starting with the BT, then the early T-34s, then the late T-34s, then the IS, and so on?
But that’s literally the only good SPAA the Americans have.
Russian bias is usually something a lot of bad players instantly go for as a justification if they make a mistake.
And seeing as there are a loooot of bad players, of course there will be a lot of examples.
In this regard you are right, nothing has changed. It has always been like this.
4 Likes
update been out for like 4 weeks
ka52 and mi28nm are still fully invulnerable to IR missiles
and still there are shills who will say no bias
rofl
(posting this logged me out instantly)
1 Like
Should have built a better AA.
2 Likes
BT-5 is worse than the M2A4.
T-34s are average for their BR, with T-34-85s being worse than M4s with 76s.
IS-1 is just a standard heavy.
The only time a Soviet tank was objectively OP was when PT-76-57 came out, but so was the EBR for the same reason.
USA has M163, XM246, M247, Chaparral, LAV-AD, XM975, ADATS, and CLAWS. All good SPAA.
@ExcaliburSniper
Oh wow, the Ka-52 is still immune to IR missiles since 2023? Water makes things wet.
Thanks for proving there’s no bias.
1 Like
No need to list them since they are all much better right? if you have to list them which means some of them suck? from 1.0 all the way to 12.0 is nothing but bussian rias, simply turn off brain then drop nuke every match hehehe, not counting air and naval yet. I see everyone who says this has 10.0kd on their ru vehicles and 1.0 on their NATOs. Fact bro
IRIS-T and 9X are both resistant to the LDIRCM that makes the ka52 and mi28nm invulnerable
conveniently the devs didnt bother implementing that, as usual
1 Like
So the whole line has to be OP from start to finish, otherwise it doesn’t count? That’s just insane. At the low BRs, the T-34s and KVs are basically ‘just drive forward and shoot.’ Closer to 6.0, the Soviets get the magical 85 mm gun with magical APHE shells that have been written about a lot on this forum. The IS-1 with its miracle armor deserves a special mention. What’s next? The early T-54s, IS-3, and IS-4, which literally half the enemy team can’t pen—no comment. Then the T-72 at 9.3—that’s a tank you can just face-roll with. I even unlocked the Object 775 specifically to do battle pass SPG tasks. The various BMDs/BMPs are so OP that in the next patch their BRs are getting raised—it’s rare for premium vehicles to get hit that fast. Then at 10.3 the Soviets have an unkillable lineup with tanks equipped with Soviet ERA that ignores the laws of physics, plus the Strela, which people even take into top tier (I thought it was already 11+, but turns out it’s still 10.3). Is that enough?
There’s no other tree in this game with that many comfortable-to-play vehicles. Except for the Soviet clones, like the T-72 in the German tree.
1 Like
There’s reliable evidence that the Ka-52’s MAW doesn’t react either to laser illumination or to a missile launch from 2–3 km.
1 Like
the 2 day special military operation has shown their lasers cant even defeat early stingers lmao
2 Likes
You’re starting to sounds like that israel hugger @noamax lol I can see both of you has the same problem, the problem is not the vehicle, it is being a one-dimentional player, a lot of vehicles are much stronger than T-72s when you stop applying “in your face” playstyles and then we look at the map we are playing, once you understand their strength and weaknesses then you will realized that the T-72 is mid. You want something that is busted in their respective br due to matchmaking nature? try T-64B, that one I will agree with you lol, then we have the Shir2 which is also one of the most busted British mbt in that respective br.
What do we have at 9.3? T-72s, Kpz-70, Olifant Mk2, CM11, ZTZ96, Gal Batash, which one of them do you think has issues dispatching the T-72A?
The majority of the team are below-average players—and honestly, I’m among them too. For some reason, one vehicle allows for a ‘roll face on the keyboard’ playstyle, while another doesn’t. But sure, it’s about the players, not the imbalance of the T-72 at its BR.
All of the above, especially as the distance increases. The T-72 can pen them anywhere on the silhouette, while they’re forced to aim for weak spots. And even when the T-72 does get penned, the internal modules tend to absorb all the damage. On top of that, all of them except the MBT-70 also have mobility issues.
Lmao none of the T-72s are unbalanced at their BRs. The majority of them are just mid at best.
Holy cope. Almost all the listed tanks, except for the KPZ-70, can just lolpen the T-72A.
1 Like
DM63 and Type1985 ? Weak spots ? Like what ? A whole hull ?
Same thing with flat earth-ers it’s not about truth it’s about what they wan’t to believe that’s why error with code or server lag turns into bias.
1 Like
The loudest crying are most of the time minorities, in game and in real life.