What does that even mean. How it is decent, if you perform worse in it than you perform in other tanks.
You contradict yourself.
That was massively fixed in 2023.
Also weird that you called all Abrams defenders trolls and now you’re on our side after you claimed everyone was wrong about Abrams having incorrect aspects.
@HOMINUSNOCTURNO-live
War Thunder makes USA look far superior to the Soviets.
Makes sense when the game is made by Europeans and is headquartered in the EU for around a decade now that they’d be fair.
To this day no one has found unrestricted Abrams armor thickness.
2S38 is far worse than HSTVL in-game just as it is IRL. HSTVL failed due to expense for a reason.
T-90M is worse than Abrams in-game just as it is IRL.
Soviets have no fake vehicles in War Thunder.
Basic facts.
Of course Russian propagandists hate these facts.
@Grossaaaa
Ka-52s don’t have F&F munitions and are thus not as capable as Tigers.
Pantsir was added to defeat GBU carriers, but IR AGMs were the main weapon of top CAS so Pantsir was useless against the good CAS.
Soviets already have autoloaders/turret baskets. They got them before Abrams and Leopard 2. Whether you like or dislike them, and any minor inaccuracies in their modeling is up to you. I personally don’t think much of it because having my basket/autoloader destroyed is not even on my mind in matches, it’s a non-issue for the playstyle I use.
Mi-28NM has had DIRCM since 2023 and has always worked on IR AAMs.
IR AGMs are not a menace in GRB anymore thanks to new SPAA systems and spawn point management.
Soviet top BR is still perfectly average. Good is average at the end of the day.
1 Like
It wasn’t a problem back then and it isn’t a problem now.
But if we go that way, remember how the PUMA was introduced ? That shit was way more broken on what BR, 8.3 ?
You calling them “Soviet” Vehicles is wrong All of the Top Tier for Russia is literally post 1990s lol so it’s Russian lol KH38MT are fake there’s 0 proof excpet for staged propaganda pictures of an IR seeker.
Well Russia is trash in the real world. Gaijin makes them look fantastic. So both technically lol
Tell me that when they fix Su-30SM flight model.
2 Likes
“there is 0 proof except the proof which i dont accept”
you would even call it fake after seeing one being fired
but why trying to reason with an unreasonable person that thinks he figured it all out after finding out that gaijin has an office in germany and germany doing good ingame now
tell me why isnt italy the best tech tree right now?
gaijins HQ is in Hungary which is a sub tree of Italy
btw i am not seeing russia in that list
4 Likes
It was literally confirmed by looking at tank’s model and files. I don’t know what you want me to say there. Again, let me make it clear and say that these “ghost modules” (aka just metal surrounding the loader), was added before detailed modules was added.
my total kd is .99… If you want to talk about only ground kills sure, but that gets rid of one of the best selling points of this tank why is a multi-purpose vehicle.
I don’t play russia 10.3, to win, I play it to grind as fast as possible. If you look at the tanks I play at this BR, you’d find out I have a wallet warrior lineup. I just hold W and try to get the most kills as possible, and repeat.
They instead get ATGMs capable of engaging both aircraft and ground targets. They also get an insanely tanky damage models, the arguably best cannons of any helicopter. But hey, the Eurocopters get FnF missiles that get have a 60% chace of doing jack at 8km tops.
Because no other nation was facing these things back then. And russia clearly did not have a contemporary SPAA in the 2S6, noooooo.
This misses the entire point of my argument, which you seem to overread intentionally. I don’t take issue with the addidtion of these modules, although it has saved me quite often from getting oneshot in a T80.
The issue is the following; read the underlined part as you seem to have trouble:
Leopard and Abrams get their turret rotaion stopped while T-Series can keep turning their turret
The Directional Laser IRCM or DLIRCM for short has been added just this patch.
1 Like
And currently Kh-38MT is so far off CAS meta at top BR partly because it exceeds top BR ground.
Right now CAS meta is laser and GPS guided munitions.
Also not sure how Gaijin making Soviets look bad in War Thunder is making them look “fantastic”.
If Gaijin were to make Soviets look good then T-72A would be 13.0 and dominate at that BR.
@Grossaaaa
Not sure why you’re bringing heli PVP into this topic when it’s a dead game mode. Vikhr’s dual mode is one of the reasons why it’s held back. A faster long range TOW missile is not a great AGM at 12.0/12.3.
2S6 is out-ranged by A-6 TRAM and F-117.
Apache retains the best cannon on any helicopter.
And no, DIRCM was added in December 2023:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/18us0d1/ka52_now_has_new_dircm/
2 Likes
I never brought Heli PvP into this discussion. You did. Calling the Vikhir a “long range tow” is like calling the Abrams a slight buffed Sherman. There’s a reason why the KA52 and MI28 are basically the only helis ran in SQBs.
So is the Roland and any other SPAA with Saclos guided missiles, what the fuck is your point? This still doesn’t explain why russia was the only nation to get a sverly better SPAA than anyone else.
This is just wrong and needs no further explanation. If anyone else still hasn’t figured out why that is, please play the BMP2M and try to kill shit with the 40mm grenade launcher instead of the cannon.
This post talks about the KA52 and it’s DIRCM, not the MI28NM and it DLIRCM.
2 Likes
Helicopters are not winning vehicles in top SQB, let alone Apaches/Ka-52s.
And the Vikhr has the same penetration and similar warhead size as TOW missiles; Vikhirs are over 2x the range and ~2x faster than TOW missiles with a similar warhead for use against tanks.
It’s the same as calling the Abrams a better Ariete MBT.
Soviets still lack a better SPAA. The better SPAA does not exist in the Soviet tech tree right now. It only exists in USA, Germany, Israel, and a bit of China.
Weird how you claim that War Thunder, the United States military, and basic data are all wrong.
All your posts do is repeat what Russia claims and call NATO liars.
DIRCM and DLIRCM have no changes between them currently as there are no IR AAMs that aren’t defeatable by either at this time. That may change in the future, but for now they defeat the same missiles and DIRCM has since 2023.
is this ragebait?
1 Like
You are a player who on average scores 1.21 K/D
And with this 2S38 tank you achieve 0.77 K/D.
Sorry, but if the tank would be as good as everybody claims it is, you would at least score around 1.21 k/d
Same thing with me, i on average score 1.46 K/D, and yet with 2S38 i score 0.78.
2S38 is far from being OP.
1 Like
Ka-52 - yes they often are
Apaches - almost never
hello IRIS? hello AIM-9X? maybe you shouldn’t be speaking about topics you know nothing about. only LDIRCM (mi28nm, z10me) can defeat those two.
@Славянский_Прострел
Instead of having posts that are rage baiting people with insults, maybe provide civil discussion.
Last time I tested DIRCM it functioned against 9X.
And instead of having posts containing rage bait [when a post contains provocative personal attacks in order to anger someone into an emotional response], you could discuss and be like “Yo. That may have changed. You should look into it.”
what insults?
when?
1 Like
You both are wrong.
FnF helicoters are infinitely better than KA52.
And also, alvis is claiming he have years of experience, yet the has like 3 or 4 battles in GRB with KA52.
1 Like
is that why they are never seen in sqbs?