The best at being food to use for grinding that’s all.
no no, it is all because US jets are all clearly from the 80tys while everyone else gets stuff from atleast 2000, you should know that the US dosent upgrade their jets /s
1 Like
I mean you just said 80tys instead of 80’s which proof you probably trolling.
the proof is the “/s” which is suposed to symbolze that that statment was made in a sarcastic manner
1 Like
So you ain’t serious?
no i wasnt
The US literally collapsed in 1991 that’s why they have shit transmission and old ugly jets.
yeah the gulf war was just too much for them
2 Likes
Damn, who took over ? Confederates or the Union ?
the british
1 Like
Makes sense why the Abrams is the worst tank in the game now, they suffer from the British treatment after all.
1 Like
yes, your equipment “never” survived such hits when there should have been nothing left of the tank, and you still managed to shoot back, and CIS players really play better than you
1 Like
That is incorrect. If you’re staying that you don’t believe there is nation bias than that is your opinion, not stating facts. There’s a difference. There is nothing Meta about the Abrams tank currently. When I’m hull down, if I’m not immediately one shorted by most opposing Russian tanks, then I’m immediately gun breeched. The tank is incredibly louder than the Russian turbine powered counterparts (which are silent most of the time). If you’ve ever been around the M1 series tanks, you’d know that an incredible percentage of the engine noise is directed out the rear. When the tank is facing you, there is hardly any noise produced, even up close. Yet the Russian turbine tanks are near silent at all ranges, even while rushing your position.
We’re all entitled to our own perceptions and opinions about the game, but neither are facts, so you’re incorrect sir.
If this post doesn’t get banned for hate speech, yet mine gets banned for using the word “moron”, than these moderators need some self reflecting …
What I believe is irrelevant, there is no nation bias regardless of what anyone believes.
The Abrams tanks are among the most mobile, their decently armored, they fire the best MBT round in the game out of the 2nd best gun for velocity, and their reload is 5.3 seconds with an expert crew.
All of that is meta.
Soviet tanks are immediately one-shot by Abrams, or gun breeched in the case of BVM.
Abrams is quieter than the T-80BVM, it’s only louder if you are sensitive to higher frequencies.
None of these are my opinion. Facts are not opinions no matter what you say.
The meta statement is based on players far more skilled than either of us.
1 Like
This is in fact, still your opinion. How do you not understand this? OPINIONS ARE NOT FACTS, even if you feel strongly about them. I experience the EXACT opposite about the Abrams penetration effectiveness. You can spew your side the argument as much as you want but most USA mains experience the EXACT opposite. Opinions are not facts. Get it through your skull sir.
1 Like
@_Balls_of_Steel
Your post is claiming USA mains are terrible at the game. Skill based matters are not relevant.
Glad you agree with me that facts are not opinions.
1 Like
Where are you from where you’re lack of reading skills have led you to this conclusion? A player’s individual experience isn’t 100% tied to their skill level. If a round incorrectly penetrates their tank, when on paper it shouldn’t, then what the hell does that have to do with their skill level? You are very close-minded, and you should really be open for discussion on a forum instead of blaming every negative mark on skill level.
@_Balls_of_Steel
I never brought up skill, I’ve yet to blame skill.
The only posts in our discussion that brought up skill was this one:
Experience is personal, not objective.
Experience is a valuable thing for understanding peoples’ perspectives.
It is not the fact that cross-analysis provides.
1 Like
Once again, you both misunderstood my post, and fail to see how your own posts are mentioning a skill issue.
Here is your message by your own words:
“Your post is claiming USA mains are terrible at the game.”
My posts don’t suggest anything about USA mains being terrible at the game. YOU said that. You’re predetermined that most USA mains are terrible at the game. Like I said before, one person’s experience isn’t solely based on their skill level. You are a very close minded person. Why are you even part of this discussion if all you want to claim is the typical “skill issue” blaming?