Russian Bias in 2025?

[Kenny110]

They will probably ended up gimping that too

[MrBombastic8]

@Lolman345

Please, try and prove to me that the massive weight increase of TUSK is somehow worth it in game for protection that is only a hair better than the ancient ERA slapped onto the M60A3 and somehow worse than kontact 1

its because Gaijin wont model TUSK or any NATO ERA correctly you can look at chally or PSO kit and see
they would definitely be better than the ERA that was made in the 70s dont tell me you think the current TUSK ingame is correct

@Lolman345

Bold of you to assume that means anything to gaijin, its getting the same armor, I expect nothing less given their track record. Heck if you want a non-US example of such, just look at how the Leopard 2AX series is somehow still using the same early composite make for every single 2A4 when it varied greatly and many 2A4s in game are obviously late make 2A4s.

you obviously new to this subject
or you mean that ur entire arguement is what Gaijin would say when SEP V3 sooner or later is introduce

[Lolman345]

@MrBombastic8

its because Gaijin wont model TUSK or any NATO ERA correctly you can look at chally or PSO kit and see
they would definitely be better than the ERA that was made in the 70s dont tell me you think the current TUSK ingame is correct

Aight so you cant prove to me that TUSK is worth having in the game. You do realize that my original argument is that gaijin FUBARed the implementation of TUSK right? You might want to re-read my original statement.

@MrBombastic8

you obviously new to this subject
or you mean that ur entire arguement is what Gaijin would say when SEP V3 sooner or later is introduce

You really need to go back and re-read my original post if you somehow think I’m at all defending gaijin or their implementation of the M1 series here.

[MrBombastic8]

so gaijin and their ingame abrams is incorrect is what ur saying yes?

[Lolman345]

Horribly incorrect in a myriad of ways along with functionally every NATO tank and I have 0 faith that gaijin will do anything to make the SEP v3 anything but another horribly incorrect mistake.

[MrBombastic8]

OH MY FUCKING GOD THEN JUST SAY IT WHY DO YOU NEED TO GO MERRY GO AROUND THE WHOLE TIME GOD DAYUM

Spoiler

im boutta blow

ah wait i get what you said
so if sep v3 is ingame gayzin would fked up again
ok understandable

[Lolman345]

@MrBombastic8

ah wait i get what you said
so if sep v3 is ingame gayzin would fked up again
ok understandabl

@Lolman345

You mean the “Same Exact Protection” v3?

I’m guessing you did not pick up on the joke I led in with, but the SEP series in WT is jokingly referred to as the “Same Exact Protection” upgrade package because gaijin, for some reason, thinks they have the same exact protection as every other M1 past the HC.

My original response was more in place to mock the notion that, somehow, gaijin adding the v3, given their track record, would somehow solve the US tree’s woes. (It wont)

[MrBombastic8]

@Lolman345

I’m guessing you did not pick up on the joke

i got bait so many time i just default to aggessive behavor

[GALWAYLION-live]

Please enlighten us on what is wrong with the Abrams. Or are you just mad it is not the fastest, strongest tank with the most invincible armour, can swim, can shoot through anything, and can be invisible?

[Lolman345]

You just going to ignore the wall of bug reports posted prior?

[T4T]

I found biggest abrams Bug. Its here.

[MrBombastic8]

im gonna bug report it

[GALWAYLION-live]

Or you could just tell me? Honestly, I am not sure where these bug reports are, plus I am asking him specifically. I am well aware of American mains who claim they are invincible in real life, completely forgetting that the best tanks they were fighting were old T-55s, and the occasional T-72 that hadn’t been touched since they were ordered, AND they were destroyed by air superiority mainly, some were destroyed by tanks, not all.

[Fat_Fury]

And what tanks are modern russian tanks fighting? oh wait NONE AS WELL… even in the current conflict in Ukraine…

A lot of russian stuff is packed into the game from brochures why won’t the american be as well huh?
I don’t want to belive that abrams has to shoot form weakspots in front to front engagements while a russian tanks just has to shoot anywhere but the cheeks of the turret…

[Lolman345]

My brother in christ they were posted here less than 30 minutes ago, and are visible on my wide screen all the way down here.

Scroll dude, its not that hard.

@GALWAYLION

were fighting were old T-55s, and the occasional T-72 that hadn’t been touched since they were ordered

Also lmao, you are aware that the Republican Guard only fielded 120 T-55s with 600 T-72M1s and 300 T-62Ms. I’m pretty sure that 87% is far larger than 13%.

[AlvisWisla]

You know what the biggest irony of all of this is?
T-90M is a better tank than the T-14 in the drone era and modern FCS era cause of the armored turret.

Unlike War Thunder where you can repair in-field, knocking out the turret of T-14 with just autocannon fire is a really bad weakness.

[MrBombastic8]

so is every tank really but yeah

[GALWAYLION-live]

Last time I was there, we had Leopard 2s, I don’t believe we had Abrams, if we did they were somewhere else. I know there were a couple of Challenger 2s, but not with me. Of course you can say they (the Leopards, Challys, and Abrams) were outdated, but Abrams are far more younger than the T-55s, T-62s, T-64s, and T-72s.

And due to the fact that I can banned for a few days for talking about a certain conflict and my involvement, I cannot really say more about it.

[_Renzo]

@Lolman345

You mean the “Same Exact Protection” v3?

The tank that wont change anything thats wrong with the prior M1s?

The Leopard 2 PSO was at most a sidegrade to the 2A6 (at the time the best Leo 2 Germany had in game), yet it increased their known winrates from 45-50% to 60-65% iirc.

As long as it’s either the only MBT or one of a few fotm effect will set in.

[Pvt_Wade]

@Lolman345

Also lmao, you are aware that the Republican Guard only fielded 120 T-55s with 600 T-72M1s and 300 T-62Ms

with 3BM17 at best (can’t touch abrams)