Please, try and prove to me that the massive weight increase of TUSK is somehow worth it in game for protection that is only a hair better than the ancient ERA slapped onto the M60A3 and somehow worse than kontact 1, or how every generation of armor package made for the M1 series somehow never actually modified the protection, instead they only made the tank heavier.
Bold of you to assume that means anything to gaijin, its getting the same armor, I expect nothing less given their track record. Heck if you want a non-US example of such, just look at how the Leopard 2AX series is somehow still using the same early composite make for every single 2A4 when it varied greatly and many 2A4s in game are obviously late make 2A4s.
Still love that there was a report about this on the old forums showcasing a Stuart penning the turret ring frontally with it’s 37mm and nothing has changed since.
its because Gaijin wont model TUSK or any NATO ERA correctly you can look at chally or PSO kit and see
they would definitely be better than the ERA that was made in the 70s dont tell me you think the current TUSK ingame is correct
you obviously new to this subject
or you mean that ur entire arguement is what Gaijin would say when SEP V3 sooner or later is introduce
Aight so you cant prove to me that TUSK is worth having in the game. You do realize that my original argument is that gaijin FUBARed the implementation of TUSK right? You might want to re-read my original statement.
You really need to go back and re-read my original post if you somehow think I’m at all defending gaijin or their implementation of the M1 series here.
Horribly incorrect in a myriad of ways along with functionally every NATO tank and I have 0 faith that gaijin will do anything to make the SEP v3 anything but another horribly incorrect mistake.
I’m guessing you did not pick up on the joke I led in with, but the SEP series in WT is jokingly referred to as the “Same Exact Protection” upgrade package because gaijin, for some reason, thinks they have the same exact protection as every other M1 past the HC.
My original response was more in place to mock the notion that, somehow, gaijin adding the v3, given their track record, would somehow solve the US tree’s woes. (It wont)
Please enlighten us on what is wrong with the Abrams. Or are you just mad it is not the fastest, strongest tank with the most invincible armour, can swim, can shoot through anything, and can be invisible?
Or you could just tell me? Honestly, I am not sure where these bug reports are, plus I am asking him specifically. I am well aware of American mains who claim they are invincible in real life, completely forgetting that the best tanks they were fighting were old T-55s, and the occasional T-72 that hadn’t been touched since they were ordered, AND they were destroyed by air superiority mainly, some were destroyed by tanks, not all.
And what tanks are modern russian tanks fighting? oh wait NONE AS WELL… even in the current conflict in Ukraine…
A lot of russian stuff is packed into the game from brochures why won’t the american be as well huh?
I don’t want to belive that abrams has to shoot form weakspots in front to front engagements while a russian tanks just has to shoot anywhere but the cheeks of the turret…
My brother in christ they were posted here less than 30 minutes ago, and are visible on my wide screen all the way down here.
Scroll dude, its not that hard.
Also lmao, you are aware that the Republican Guard only fielded 120 T-55s with 600 T-72M1s and 300 T-62Ms. I’m pretty sure that 87% is far larger than 13%.
You know what the biggest irony of all of this is?
T-90M is a better tank than the T-14 in the drone era and modern FCS era cause of the armored turret.
Unlike War Thunder where you can repair in-field, knocking out the turret of T-14 with just autocannon fire is a really bad weakness.
