Go straight to coping but well , fair. Here
I only play one premium to grind and make SL. Take this as you will
I only play one premium to grind and make SL. Take this as you will
1 Like
I’ve seen several Clickbait players play so good with the Abrams, but yeah there’s few players that lack skills but that goes for every nation.
So you don’t have any M1A2 and you get to talk about “Muh the Abrams doesn’t suffer from anything it’s just a skill issue” Buddy turn off your computer.
Most abram are the same tho ? This one is 11.7. If I can do good with this I will be able to do the same with the rest. Already proven with other nation , especially when all top tier tank are basically the same. I have the stuff to back it up , what do you have ? And most of my game are uptier , literally no issue dealing with T series or any of the 2A7/STRV
1 Like
They’re certainly not, if you actually played an M1A2 you’d say the same.
Basically , not entirely. Performance will essentially the same with some different between them , that nothing of an issue , especially if you play through many nation. I don’t stick with one nation , I never do
That’s not evidence of Russian bias, especially when it’s treated identically to the IR Hammer.
Nothing would change; USA has a playerbase issue.
Abrams was the best tank from 2019 - 2024, yet American win rates were only amazing from 2019 - 2022 because skilled players moved on to different tech trees/stopped playing.
Oh and Abrams were more bugged in 2020 than present.
Yes the Abrams has issues, those issues don’t impact its ability to be a meta tank in War Thunder.
@_Balls_of_Steel
Saying that there’s no nation bias is just stating a fact, reality.
If you think stating reality is defending Gaijin, then you have issues that you need to resolve.
2 Likes
There’s a huge difference between a M1A1 and M1A2, the last one suffer from more fragile turret ring and faces superior Tanks most of the time that’s what makes them unplayable, a shot to your track can easily take out your horizontal+engine.
I assure you , when 90% of the games are uptier. It would not make a different when you show a bit of your tank , you will get pen. Don’t hit me with that huge different, you probably already know , since you know about Abram that much. The 3BM60 can auto click the whole Abram except for some few turret spot. That the top tier shell with the lowest pen at top tier. Why would I care about such different when all the thing I know about them I gonna get from Click Bait ?
The main idea to go from a M1A1 to M1A2 is the armor upgrade which there’s none, i know Top Tier is cancerous but compared to the 2A7,B+,T90M,T80BVM that you need to aim for a specific weakspot, this doesn’t happen when you’re against an Abrams, any spot you shoot at the tank becomes disabled which is what i’m trying to say.
Before the basket implementation, Gaijin modeled the hydraulic pump as horizontal which is a bug and made the tank vulnerable and any hull damage was going to take out your horizontal, now with basket nerf it made the tank more unplayable.
You mean the “Same Exact Protection” v3?
The tank that wont change anything thats wrong with the prior M1s?
People time and time again said that the SEP and SEP V2 would make the hull better, the cheeks thicker, and the TUSK kits would greatly improve their survivability. Instead they sport the same armor as the original M1A2 and the TUSK kits are nothing more than wasted weight slowing down a already heavy tank.
The only benefit brought by the SEP series so far is the better optics and thats it, if anything they got worse because of the remote weapon systems and crew protection installed ontop of the vehicle which now allows for an extremely easy HE kill on the later M1s.
The SEP v3 will not change anything, its going to be just a SEP v2 with some stuff bolted on and maybe Trophy, neither of which resolve the actual issues with the M1 series.
2 Likes
Look man I already know that , what I want now is an solution to Abram. All variant from the earliest to the latest , what could be done to fix them. Ignore the CAS/SPAA and Heli. Those can be a discussion of their own. What could we , possibly do to make them meet you US players expectation. Im being serious here , that the question
Then that kind doesn’t explain why Soviet MiG-21Bis has the better stat despite being available to multiple nation. Same MiG-21bis across the board btw
you want my document or take my word on what im going to say?
the SEPv3 visably increased armor thickness so gaijin cant claim bs about the armor not changing despite evidence that it has like they did for the other SEPs
1 Like
First by starting to buff the turret ring to 200mm of protection, second by adding DU to the M1A1 HC’s hull and maybe more tanks, third fix the hydraulic pump even when damaged it wouldn’t disable the horizontal…etc, i’m going to add few bug reports that would give an idea.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xK4GPBS59dUL
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Y2HnjTv8kNAG
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m0ITNd22gRXO
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/D1Wg94Hrg2Vg
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hn6WHPVB7r3K
1 Like
i have one of the report or document about the usage of depleted uranium in tanks
the M1>A2 has the same hull layout(different in composite generation and array) which the A1 should have marginally better hull than the M1 and so on
the report was made after and around the time SEP was introduce and given things like the AIM the SEP would make sense to have improvement in hull armor further(since the turret side was also improve) more V3 of course would have better and the best armor out of all Abrams
follow by the V2
during the swedish trial they outright said the export version is way worse than the domestic one for comparison
Actually there a pretty decent chunk that needs to be fixed.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hn6WHPVB7r3K
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9pd3QSYFMjsV
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ULvSC60SVBFw
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/I9SK1Z8A6c4I
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xK4GPBS59dUL
Please, try and prove to me that the massive weight increase of TUSK is somehow worth it in game for protection that is only a hair better than the ancient ERA slapped onto the M60A3 and somehow worse than kontact 1, or how every generation of armor package made for the M1 series somehow never actually modified the protection, instead they only made the tank heavier.
Bold of you to assume that means anything to gaijin, its getting the same armor, I expect nothing less given their track record. Heck if you want a non-US example of such, just look at how the Leopard 2AX series is somehow still using the same early composite make for every single 2A4 when it varied greatly and many 2A4s in game are obviously late make 2A4s.
Still love that there was a report about this on the old forums showcasing a Stuart penning the turret ring frontally with it’s 37mm and nothing has changed since.
I just want them to added it already so I can see how they’re going to F it over.
1 Like
The CATTB is straight up the only possible saving grace for the US tech tree at this point.
1 Like