I could be wrong but. If you shoot them too close its obviously that they wont do top down attack.
The video on the Report you posted. Its not even top down attack. Its just flying at Chopper altitud and hitting the target. Almost at the same as the Ingame video you posted. The only diff i can thing of its that the one on your ingame video has more distance to the target than the IRL video. The missile in the IRL video don’t even try to climb after launch.
From February to August, Click Bait had the best WR out of all US MBTs at 11.7 in every single month except May. So yeah, it’s 6 months, not 3.
The 7.7 T-54 is good, IS-3 is mediocre, and the T-55A is decent.
All amazing
Is3 does have lower kill potential cuz the reload but exept that its great
Is it my imagination? - serious question, not looking to bicker - or has this bias gotten appreciably worse lately? I can’t go a single naval nor ground match without being one-shotted by a red - often completely paper - vehicle. I still like this game, so I genuinely want to dispel myself of this common notion if it really is just myth. But since Tusk Force I’m finding the game almost unplayable, and the bias (along with some wretched server performance/packet loss lately) is making it very difficult to have any fun.
It seems to me that nothing has really changed; players on NATO vehicles, as usual, leave the battle after one death.
If I’m getting stabbed on a subway by a tweaker - I’m getting out on the next station, that’s kinda obvious. Not wanting to go for seconds is pretty normal in this case.
Is this about the Kronshtadt/Soyuz? I’m not aware of any of these USSR ground forces being partially built?
100%. Especially Soyuz.
There shouldn’t even be re-spawns in RB. It’s lame that there are. But the only time I one death leave is when I’m one-shotted within the first seconds of entering the match - often the result of being boxed in by “friendly” bot spawns - which happens way more than it should.
Yes
Clearly I’m asking for some elaboration.
Id say the bias is real!! WHEN RNG wants it to be.!!! Not even a “Hit” ofcourse what would I know ehh!!! Not like we study where and with what to shoot tanks ONLY for it to be ignored just to give said Bias
Did I mention we lost that match with humiliation… they literally walked all over us! FUNNY how that works isnt it… but nooooooo bias doesnt exist.! Mooooo pat is what I say to that.!
Not being funny - but If Im English - owning an English game… why in the heck would I not do it! Saying that - funny how the British tech tree is quite possible the worse ever and rarely anyone plays it.! Just saying!!
ALSO since the update - play Usa or UK and guess what — Russian and German trees put together - LETS PUT THE MOST OP TREES TOGETHER ALLLLLL THE TIME! 4.3BR - 8 KV1s – Seems legit!
you are correct
but for the other posters who are pretending its 2001 still we have fun things like statistics now.
keep in mind this is up to date for the month of october (all time up to and including october)
Hot damn, france eating good
frenchies cried their way to this
IS-3 has more armor than the T26E5 as well.
T26 can still be penned by 90mm APCR and
I said T26E5 not M46
Why are you not using the vehicles being compared, and instead other vehicles rounds?
The T-14 has more pen over the KV-1 and has a more armored turret, and stronger hull. It also has a stab.
That is the T26E5.
The T14’s round pen is marginally more.
Yes…? I was talking about the T26E5 vs an IS3
