Simple dimensions say so. The spacing between the engines on the Su-27Sm and Su-30 are smaller and thats why they only fit the Su-35
the most recent f15e flight manuals arent in our hands to disprove the double pylons either
so clearly should be added by the same logic
1 Like
Yes Su-35 and Su-27SM3
I know i can’t believe the level of deflection going on.
Just because I have F-15E flight manuals doesn’t mean I can post them.
That and spacing is fine here @luque13
Not dual pylons but yes they can.
Thats an Indian Su-30MKII, im not sure on the differences
The model is inacurrate in game
Is there evidence that the double pylon is not wide enough?
Edit:
The pylon width seems accurate.
only su35 has been seen with dual pylons irl. they added dual pylons to su27sm/su30sm cus they dont want to add su35. i think they should have simply added su35 along with rafale n eurofgihter. but people would complain a bit more but its better than these fake loadout
2 Likes
how ever the su27sm3 irl can carry 10 r77s (it gets 2 extra pylons) , the su27sm in game can carry 10 r77 s (2 extra cus of double pylons). u can say gaijin was just lazy to model 2 extra pylons n just gave it double pylons to make it a makeshift su27sm3.
2 Likes
Yes the Su-27SM is fine the Su-30 should not have been afforded the additional missiles
Su-35s Radar is the biggest issue being able to sit in the notch will be hard to play against.
Same issue with Typhoons Captor E AESA
A follow up:
It also looks like the 11.5 inch added wing length to each side [1 foot 11 inches total] is purely wing and the engine positions seem to have not changed:
Though it’d be better with schematics for more than an estimate.
Su-27 with 12 pylons
this is what i belive gaijin wnats the ingame 27SM to be but they were to lazy to add the extra pylons to the 3d model
so the made another frankenplane
all because gaijin couldnt be bothered with fixing the flightmodel and instead were making changes noone asked for
and then they probably gave the Su-30 the double pylons as well becasue the improvment over the Su-27SM wouldnt have been big enough to justify grinding it
we dont need a 15E manual for that
what you are talkin g about is a propsed f-15C upgrade
see it is a single seater
Except the Su-27s’ flight models were fixed.
That and Gaijin could have company documents they purchased.
Great joke
You don’t need any documents to see that it wrong
1 Like
I’ve done that maneuver in that air show a number of times.
It’s hard to get on video cause I can only reliably do it in cockpit view cause 3rd person camera movement messes with me too much.
That video has nothing about disproving its current meta dogfight performance.
Replay?