This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
Most of my games at top tier I see Russia Germany and Sweden on the same team.
It’s hilarious seeing them hard-coding the 3 best nations together since they added the 2A7. Having to aim for the first time really made them insecure
1 Like
That’s an interesting assumption
2 Likes
There is no other reason to hard code the 3 together, especially when they have the best SAM. If anything Germany and Sweden should be with US almost every game, but they went the complete opposite route.
At this point it’s a genuine surprise when I don’t see these three on the same team with no one else
1 Like
How do you know they are hardcoded? I’d assume that the MM sees a disproportionately large amount of US players, so they are rarely teamed up with other major nations.
And assuming Gaijin is the one who did it is quite funny.
Because like I said almost all of my games at top tier I see them together. It’s not always but it’s so incredibly frequent that it’s clearly programmed that way. And no the MM has actually had an overwhelming amount of russian players lately compared to US, usually 2x to 3x more than US.
Lmao who else?
1 Like
Russian Bias? Nope. Premium Bias? Just look at the Type 90 (B) Fuji, the Turm III, the T29, the T114, the T-55AM-1 of course. Gaijin does not have any ideology, neither for Russia nor all other natoin. The only thing a company belives in is money, and by that should their decisions be judged.
4 Likes
Please. If this was about money then the high/top tier ‘premium line up’ of every nation would be comparable, but in reality only Russia has a strong one.
2 Likes
Try to find such a lineup for Japan, Chine etc.
USA has got something similar: KVT, M1128, Click-Bait, AIM, F-20A, A-10A etc.
Germany also got this: 2A4M, 2PL, 2 Pz.Btl.123, Vilkas, Tornado etc.
In my eyes, they gave such lineups to the bug three, because those nations are the most popular and thus the most profitable.
1 Like
… Are you aware that all of those vehicles for USA and Germany you rang off have different BR ranges and don’t form a cohesive line-up or are you just pretending to be functionally inept?
It’s not like building a premium only lineup is a Russia only thing, too.
There still is atleast 2 MBTs that you can purchase for the US, UK, and Germany that are all at the same BR.
Russian bias doesn’t exist, premium bias does.
4 Likes
This is true, at 11.7 all three major nations have one premium and one squadron vehicle each.
Russia is the only nation at multiple BR placements where you can build a full or near full line-up with premium vehicles that have next to no BR gap.
Literally the only nation. No other nation has that privilege.
2 Likes
Is that including current and old premiums? What about event ones or unobtainable ones?
The US can do 6.3, 6.7, 7.0, 11.7. Germany can do 2.0, 3.7/4.0/4.3, 5.7, 9.3, 11.7. Russia can do 1.3, 2.3, 4.0, 6.3, 10.3, and 11.7.
It isn’t the end of the world that Russia can have some good premium lineups at certain BRs. I’d rate the US 6.7/7.0 lineups the best just based on the amount of choice you have in the tanks and aircraft.
5 Likes
No it’s not, it is either as Protogen said, too many US players or meta-gamer squads.
False and false. There’s almost always more russian players in the queue than US because the average player prefers playing on easy mode.
Keep defending your rigged game by lying though.
1 Like
Not always.
1 Like
Only relevant to top tier I think.
1 Like
There is always more US players queuing in ARB than Russian ones, does that mean game rigged towards US players?
2 Likes