To be fair this update just seems to be boosting Russia as much as possible, they get broken BMPTs, a boost to their cas loadouts as they can spawn them (at least air) for way less, R77 seem to have gotten a magical buff imo. Gaijin must have lacked in the boosting Russian image the last few months so had to make up for it.
Bro as a russian all you have to do is not over extend and blizkrieg your way into bad spots? Sure the reverse gear can suck, but your better armor should make a difference. But it doesn’t, because yall want to just zoom around the map with no consequences and just steam roll everything you see.
here we go again. omg bais everywhere.
its got nerfed, got a weak round that cant pen anything from the front, can ammo rack it, typical T-series weak spot.
yeah sure the bais is 6 kh38mt and not 16 spice250 bomb who wipe all the maps
you know what, your right. everyone was getting stuff while russia did get nothing
Or why do you think Russia Bias is a real issue
Gaijin should really switch away their devs
funny how the T58s 2.6 sec auto loader at 8.3 isn’t OP because it has weak lower hull that you can shoot through, but Russia gets a 6 sec auto loader and its the end of the world.
Wild for people to use the “it cant reload at that rate while moving” logic while acting like this isnt an issue for manual loading
6 sec that cant still beat the 5 sec of the nato tanks.
crazy
the only questionable ones imo are the T-64s/80UD and BVM, the rest needed something and the 7.1 to 7.0 change is a nothingburger
edit: and the VT4 needed a downtier more but whatever
I still don’t get this, T-64A now at 6.0s but T-64B is at 7.0? like what
The Abrams has a 5-second reload time, but it has no armor at all; it’s practically a light tank. Maybe if you look at the reload time, you should also look at the armor.
And if you compare the overall Abrams vs the overall BVM (so all aspects) most actually good players agree which one comes out on top.
And hint, it’s not the BVM the overwhelming majority of the time.
Its always trues that Russia bias is an issue
why NATO tanks are so weak compared to the Russians?
Because Gaijin is connected with the military department of Russia
So they could get more leaks and details of their own tanks
“Most actually good players”
What is the percentage of this claim? Top 10%? Top 1%? MLG pro gamers?
I hear it often what’s the data behind this?
Players that can make accurate flick shots between [insert tank here]'s weak spots make a tank good?
People with actual map knowledge, situational awareness, a brain that actually decides it wants to help them. Hell at this point someone with functioning eyes could qualify.
Armor is only 1 factor, and it’s only good if your enemy is either braindead or can’t aim. The Abrams has enough other advantages to more than compensate for the less than ideal armor. So if you are getting penetrated in the Abrams you have actually made a whole bunch of mistakes already to get to that point.
This is hilarious, because it’s nonsense lies.
My buddy who is a USA main, started Russia and is now at 9.7 and all he has complained about the whole time is dying to things that’s shouldn’t have killed him.
The entire time playing any T series he complains of dying to fuel explosions.
I think your out of your league, have nothing to complain about and complain about Russian tanks getting their accurate reload, when they’ve been preforming poorly at top tier
@Forum Moderators
I think it’s right that they change it, if it’s realistic. What I also hope is that they lower the armor on all Soviet tanks that use Textolite, since a report that was accepted and corrected reduced the protection of the T-64A, which is related to Textolite, indicating that the hull protection of all the others should be changed.
Exactly like the Abrams reload, stationary, ammo type you want right in the sweet spot, loader fresh and not waiting for the blast door to close before arming the gun.
literally accounted for in the docs, not to mention it also would affect manual loaders but hey, gaijin gave you a flat 5-6 sec manual load, while keeping the type 10 at 4 instead of 3.3 for the sake of balance
and isnt there like 3 tanks with any actual change, since most got a buff of like 0.1 or 0.5 secs? and one of those just got a br nerf isnt it?
3 supposedly getting a 1.1 sec faster reload, but the T64B and T-80B only got a 0.1 sec buff so far, the rest are 0.5 sec or less, it’s a nice little buff for some of them completely irrelevant for the rest. hardly worth the drama people are kicking up over it.